Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geezus....Zell Miller is on CSpan now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:11 AM
Original message
Geezus....Zell Miller is on CSpan now
Get off the stage!!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
schrodinger_I Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is a kook!
I can't stand the guy. I bet Georgians probably cringe whenever he speaks..... He is such an idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. He is on our side?!!!
With friends like that we don't need any enemies. Why doesn't he just switch parties already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's a pity we can't drum him out of the party
If he's a Democrat, I'm Queen Victoria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Seger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. "Why doesn't he just switch parties already."
Because he gets a LOT more attention being a Bush-loving Democrat, and apparently that's the one and only thing he cares about. Screw the people dying in the Middle East, screw the suffering unemployed, screw the environment, screw our children's future; Zell is getting his ugly face on TV all the time. In other words, he's a typical "conservative" fuckwad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. an intellectual charlatan, a moral and ethical fraud
note that he has avoided the issue of the nominees judical philosophies and instead calls for "fairness."

where is the fairness of 3,000,000 unemployed, where is the justice of 41 million without health insurance, and 18 million children living in poverty?

typical creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'd just assume have a straight-up Republican in his place...
...then again, I guess that would not be any different than now...

Does he EVER side with the party and DEM voters who got him elected???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, he doesn't.
He has a 100% Republican voting record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. A Republican from Georgia talking all the nonsense that Zell does

would probably get little attention. So maybe we'd be better off with a Repuub.

We Georgians who voted for him thought he'd be okay as a senator -- he had been our governor, after all. And then-governor Roy Barnes (D) appointed him to replace Paul Coverdell (R) who died suddenly. Zell didn't give us a clue he'd gone batshit crazy until after the election, which wasn't long after his appointment. I think 9/11 really scrambled his brains but he always liked Dubya because he "understands the infield fly rule."

So far, only Repubs are talking about running for Zell's seat. Not very encouraging. I don't blame Max for not running, after the way he was treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Did you notice how ol' Zell positioned his arguement on...
how these judicial nominees are rugged individualists? They're just plain folks who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps against all odds...yada, yada, yada. Typical anti-progressive rhetoric.

And then, to top it all off...he positions the Democratic party as anti-south. Notice how he harped on each nominees regional roots? Gawd, what a cheap appeal to people's emotions.

Zell needs to move on over across the aisle and kiss Saxby's ass. Leave our party Zell! Your book was the last offense. :grr:

As for me, I'll take my Senator (Barbara Boxer) anyday over that phoney Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. He wants to revive the dixiecrats
That is racist code! Has been since reconstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Silver lining
He's retiring in 04 - not running again. Now Georgians can elect a true Republican to the Senate. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. just sent him a telegram
"I have watched you this morning on the floor of the Senate. You are a disgraceful intellectual charlatan, devoid of any moral or ethical integrity. You knowingly and repeatedly lied about the US Constitution, which I have sworn to defend. You lied about the details of the judicial nominee deliberations. Have you no shame? People in this country are hurting and all you can do is stand there and lie. What the hell is wrong with you? You have a duty to this country and do not serve its best interests. In fact, you are willfully participating in its ruin."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsbc Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. what was his lie?
didn't catch the speech, what did he say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. that the constitution required full up or down votes on judicial nominees
it was a way to demand that the 4 nominees be voted upon and bypass the filibuster process, and he said that such filibusters had never been used before.

that was the lie, filibusters had been used scores of times, the repukes attempted to make the claim but never mentioned that filibusters had been attempted, especially against clinon's nominees (55 of clinton's nominees never even had a vote but only 4 bush nominees) the only difference was that the dems had been successful in the last few months.

168 nominations of 172 passed, 98%,

under clinton, 80% passed. that's the gross hypocrisy

daschle came on immediately afterward and corrected him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. If I heard correctly, when this
marathon began and Frist was speaking at 6:00 p.m. yesterday, Frist said that he and Zell Miller are introducing a bill to stop the cloture votes and just have up or down votes. Now Frist can say that it is a bipartisan bill. These guys and such liars and crooks.

I want to know who REALLY put these incompetent criminals in charge of our country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC