Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Equipment, Lesson 2: Basic Tactical Communications

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 07:29 PM
Original message
Army Equipment, Lesson 2: Basic Tactical Communications
Lesson 1: Why the M-16 is so bad
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=706392

Okay folks, you asked for it.

We used to use smoke signals to communicate. Still do, in fact--soldiers can draw grenades that produce one of four different colors of smoke. The daily signals operating instructions tells the troop what color to use in what circumstance. And, assuming someone from the MI battalion hasn't breached your perimeter, pried the lid off the bottom of your smoke grenades, dumped out half of the smoke powder and refilled them with tear gas powder (like I used to do to units with bad security), you can pop a red grenade to show a helicopter pilot it's safe to land, or a green one to mark the edge of your battalion's sector. IIRC you can get red, green, yellow and purple.

(It is no fun to draw a fifty-gallon drum of tear gas powder when you're a specialist fourth class who's not in the chemical company but who is standing there chuckling and rubbing your hands together in anticipation of going to the woods for a month...)

This isn't about smoke. It's about radio.

Nowadays they have all sorts of neat stuff--fax machines, datacom, you name it and it's there. But a mile down the road from your state-of-the-art Pentium-powered setup is another unit whose radio gear was captured from the Viet Cong.

The radios I grew up with were from the VRC-12 series. No one has ever seen a VRC-12. An official VRC-12 has twelve buttons on the front. Each is set to a different frequency. Push one and it tunes the radio to a particular net. They tell me you have to use a hammer to get the buttons to go in. No one wants this radio because if you need to be on twelve pushes (radio nets) at once, you need to be able to hear twelve pushes at once, which means you need twelve radios.

The two radios you're more likely to see are the VRC-46 and the PRC-77. Both can have voice scramblers hooked to them. The -46 is for vehicles, although you can get a power supply and plug it into the wall. It has two output power settings, low (five watts) and high (seventy). It has two squelches to stop the evil hiss from coming through. Old squelch is signal-level-activated; new squelch is tone-activated. (This was the high tech of its day. Your radio transmitted a low-pitched tone along with your voice. The squelch would only open if it heard that tone.) No one uses the old squelch. This radio weighs 70 pounds and has three tubes in it.

The next two radios in this series are the VRC-47 and VRC-48. You get one VRC-46 transmitter plus either one (-47) or two (-48) receivers. If you need to be on three pushes at once a -48 might work, but when you tune your transceiver to the frequency on one of the receivers, you have to diligently set the receiver to the frequency that was on the transmitter...any wonder why someone who might think about using a -47 would rather have two -46s instead?

(Note: There is a big problem with putting two -46s in a HMMWV. The radio sits between the front seats in a Hummer. Put two -46s in and the driver can't see around the radios.)

The reason no one uses old squelch is the PRC-77, which only has new squelch. This is manpackable, but there is a tray to let you use it in a vehicle. It has one power setting, five watts. It runs off a battery that's about the size of a long brick and lasts as long as it feels like. I could put a battery in and get two days out of it, then put another battery from the same batch in and get six hours. Then change batteries and get an hour, followed by getting three days out of the fourth.

These radios are old and slightly unreliable, but the real reason we need to get rid of them is because we can't talk to the British and Germans unless we send them one of our radios. They use frequency-hopping radios that change channels fifty times a second. To talk to the allies, we introduce SINCGARS--the Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System. One radio for both trucks and helicopters--and small enough to carry in a rucksack! This is a good system that's in short supply.

Now for fun: We also have a system called MSE--Mobile Subscriber Equipment. Remember the cell phones you had to have mounted in your car? MSE is like that--a telephone instrument on the dash, a very large transceiver box in the back seat. It also jams your SINCGARS radio last I checked. Hopefully that's been fixed. MSE gives the user a lot of capability: you can hook your computer to it, call your office phone, even order a tank of acetylene from the local welding shop if you run out. The weak point in MSE is that the division signal battalion owns the cell towers, and they don't always come to the field with you. (However, you always take the MSE gear when you go out; it is too hard to get it out of your truck.)

We have some satellite stuff, but it came out after I got out, so no information there, sorry.

We've always had radio teleprinter capability--we call it RATT, for Radio Teletype. The RATT Rig is a box that looks like a pickup camper. It is staffed by a trained soldier, and it's at a fairly high echelon--the division signal battalion owns all the RATT in division and sends it to brigade when it's needed. Sometimes battalion. No lower. We were playing around with using PCs as terminals with a specially-modified ham radio RTTY modem back in the early 1990s. Maybe that works now. Who knows?

We also have wireline. There are two kinds: the old crank-type TA-312 field phone that made you feel like you should be asking about how the corn was growing when you used it, and the new touchtone one that requires bringing the signal battalion out with you. Most guys with the touchtone one also bring out a TA-312 and an SB-22 switchboard even though that's Korean War technology; you can run over a TA-312 with a Jeep and it will still work. (Don't ask me how I know this.)

That's basic stuff.

Who gets what? Depends on the unit. I always had any gear I wanted. An infantry platoon will have a PRC-77, maybe some little squad radios (they're buying police-model handhelds now) and perhaps a field phone. The division commander will have a truck with enough radios to talk to everyone directly subordinate to him at one time. He'll also have Iridium and MILSAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madddog Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. here's an interesting read
Edited on Thu Nov-13-03 08:40 PM by madddog
http://www.isayeret.com/weapons/assault/m16vsak47.htm

seems the IDF disagrees with that assesment of the M16...or at least their Special Forces do.

Actually, that site is full of good info, and some surprising candid views on the political/budget problems in Israel is it relates to the military.

I found that site because I just spoke to a friend of mine who's here from Israel, looking to buy 23 of the ceramic vests like the ones mentioned at that website. I thought he was making it up...but there it was. It seems the parents of a platoon of IDF guys wants to come up with about $16K to buy the vests 'cos the IDF won't depley them...supplies are limited now. I can't believe they can't find the money in Israel from private sources, but what can you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The M16A2 is a good weapon.
Very accurate for an assault rifle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-03 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The A2 was a huge improvement over the A1
I love the A2, it is one of my favorite weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. field phones?
Wow. I was in the Army for 5 years and only saw them once. Do they still use them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldSoldier Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, actually they do
You'll really only see them at brigade and higher. Running field wire is a pain in the ass if you're only going to be in a position for a few hours (and policing it up is even worse), so battalions don't like running the lines.

The thing I liked best about field wire? No one ever camouflaged it, so if you were trying to get from your position up to brigade main, you just followed the WD-1A right up to the perimeter. (Of course, the enemy could do the same thing.)

At division you'll see 26-pair Signal Corps cable running all over the place. This is fun if you want to tap the field phones; just pull out your handy Junction Box and hook in. (I'm not sure why, but my unit was always put right next to a hock-to-hock splice in the division field cable system...perfect for mayhem. Umm...come to think of it, maybe that was the reason--they knew the enemy would screw with the field cable system, so to train the wiredogs in quicky line tracing, they just put the MI guys right next to the cable.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC