CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 01:56 PM
Original message |
knight_of_the_star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And with every one of the repugs saying teh same thing over and over again, I think they succeeded more than they would like to have in making asses of themselves.
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Are people happy that Democrats approved 168 so that they wouldn't |
|
be the boys and girls who cried "wolf" when 4 really bad judges came along?
I'm not happy that they let 168 go by, but I certainly see the value in drawing the line at these four. I think it really turned the table on the Republicans. And I suspect that when the next Democrat is elected, they'll get even moe mileage out of the 168-4 record.
|
ShimokitaJer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I wouldn't count on it |
|
The Repubs are already gloating about what they'll do if a liberal judge ever comes before them. It's so ironic that they can simultaneously deny ever blocking a Clinton judge, lambast the Democrats for filibustering, and then threaten them with the same later on. Their hypocrisy never ceases to amaze me.
|
nostamj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
cute kitties :-) :loveya:
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-14-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Streak misses her daddy!!!! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |