Fox has been in an uproar for sometime now.......

[onecitizen]

over this:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,103163,00.html

calling this the smoking gun and aren't all the Dems going to be eating crow over this. HA!!

Anyway, I scanned the posts and didn't see it yet but if it's a dupe, ignore please.

BTW, it's about evidence of collaboration 'tween OBL and SH for 10 years! Leaked memo to Fox. Ain't it somethin' that Fox gets all this inside info?

[Cush]

1. they kind of backtracked

on TV earlier, said it was just RAW INTEL that was never verified, cirumstational, etc. They said it wasn't proof. (they were gloating earlier)

[Democrats unite]

2. can't be to terribly important...

The link won't open.

on edit: never mind the lonk opened.

[onecitizen]

15. yeah, sometimes those lonks can........

be tricky.

[soothsayer]

3. faux should be in an uproar about the coming cspan propaganda

channel----what, fox not doing their job enuff for the bushistas?

as for this other thing.....snore...zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[DuctapeFatwa]

4. Saddam works for the CIA too?

I thought he was just an occasional contractor they dropped back in 91 over some dispute over his cut of Kuwait.

[yella_dawg]

6. Oh, I'm sure Saddam and Osama both

were picking up an occasional assignment here and there, just to keep their retirement.

[kentuck]

5. Somebody told them their numbers would be higher earlier....

So the folks that saw it then will never know the difference because it is a different audience watching later. It's clever.

[Kamika]

7. "the terror lord"

big fat Lol


Bet some arab wrestler gonna show up on WWE soon with that name :D

[maggrwaggr]

8. and about 50% of the American population will now accept this as "FACT"

that's the sad part.

[alcuno]

16. Don't you think a large portion of the population is now on to them?

I mean how many times can people fall for the same lies? Are we citizens or are we dupes?

[yella_dawg]

9. Oh my god!

I habitually ignore all things Fox. But I punched the link to see what all the stink was about. First time I've encountered anything Fox in probably five years. My god! My high school journalism teacher would have kicked me out of class for writing that story! It doesn't just break every rule of objective journalism, it creates new rules to break. I honestly didn't think it could get so bad. Forget college, what are they teaching the sheeple in high school?

Fox could only thrive in a country of idiots.

[onecitizen]

13. I do too but today.........

I had company that wanted to watch it. The Gregg guy that used to be on MSNBC was practically hysterical over it. He was interviewing Congresswoman Sanchez from Ca. and was really trying to dog her about it. Saying things like: "whattaya say about THAT Congresswoman?" She said things like "if they had this valuable info all along why didn't they share it with us like 2 years ago?"

[alcuno]

10. So why did * say "no connection to 9/11?"

This "info" has been around for a year. They are getting desperate.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

14. IIrc, the Czechs debunked this 6 months ago.

:shrug:

[Dagaz]

11. Let's wait and hear from Rockefeller

The story says that he was presented the report weeks ago so lets first find out if that is true.

[roguevalley]

12. I can't remember who said it. It might have been someone other than

David Corn in a Buzzflash interview or the guy who wrote
the O'Leilly book on Bill who said that Fox seems powerful
but they only reach what? 2,000,000 homes as part of a
cable package that no one has control of. That means that
their core audience is about 200K on any good night. We
have to take away their power.

[Old and In the Way]

17. Fox's credibility is intrinsicly tied to this administration's.

Their credibility is in the crapper...just like their WH hero. Why don't they change their name to the Republican News Network and get it over with. They aren't fooling anyone.