Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meet the Press with Clark on CNBC now 10:05 pm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:06 PM
Original message
Meet the Press with Clark on CNBC now 10:05 pm
If you missed it earlier, as I did. Or you want another dose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. that fat fffff is listing page after page of quotes (at least FIVE) taken
out of context.

somebody mentioned this in the earlier thread.

why doesn't he tell Russert to SHOVE his quotes up his fat sphinc/piehole (same place)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ahhhhhhhhhhh ha ha ha!!!!
this is where he axed Russert to read the rest of the article.

he warmed up as he talked about the PLAN they had in Kosovo, as opposed to lack of plan in Iraq.

Russert asks why everybody (Clark, WJC, France, UN) believed intel of WMD. asks if it's massive intelligence failure.

clark: indicators from intel that there were INDICATORS, no smoking guns. that's why we didn't invade when WJC was pres, and why we SHOULDN't have invaded in March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clark came prepared.
Loved it when he asked if Potato read the entire thing.

Clark nailed it. IT was sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. it's UH oh time
O know (and so do others) something Russert should, but doesn't---it's from his show, so he'll be ready, and use it sometime---and it will be used to smear his character.

speaking of smears, Russert just quoted the amorphous Shelton quote about his character, and Clark is not calling it such, deMANDing that fat prick be specific when he's spewing out nebulous accusations.

he should have asked Russert, at last, sir, have you no SHAME?

Russert keeps GOING, mentioning the character thing AGAIN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC