chimpymustgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-16-03 10:06 PM
Original message |
Meet the Press with Clark on CNBC now 10:05 pm |
|
If you missed it earlier, as I did. Or you want another dose.
|
buycitgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-16-03 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. that fat fffff is listing page after page of quotes (at least FIVE) taken |
|
out of context.
somebody mentioned this in the earlier thread.
why doesn't he tell Russert to SHOVE his quotes up his fat sphinc/piehole (same place)?
|
buycitgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-16-03 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. ahhhhhhhhhhh ha ha ha!!!! |
|
this is where he axed Russert to read the rest of the article.
he warmed up as he talked about the PLAN they had in Kosovo, as opposed to lack of plan in Iraq.
Russert asks why everybody (Clark, WJC, France, UN) believed intel of WMD. asks if it's massive intelligence failure.
clark: indicators from intel that there were INDICATORS, no smoking guns. that's why we didn't invade when WJC was pres, and why we SHOULDN't have invaded in March.
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-16-03 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Loved it when he asked if Potato read the entire thing.
Clark nailed it. IT was sweet.
|
buycitgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-16-03 10:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
O know (and so do others) something Russert should, but doesn't---it's from his show, so he'll be ready, and use it sometime---and it will be used to smear his character.
speaking of smears, Russert just quoted the amorphous Shelton quote about his character, and Clark is not calling it such, deMANDing that fat prick be specific when he's spewing out nebulous accusations.
he should have asked Russert, at last, sir, have you no SHAME?
Russert keeps GOING, mentioning the character thing AGAIN!!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message |