Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Clinton by Weissman and Mokhiber

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AntiLempa Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:04 AM
Original message
Howard Clinton by Weissman and Mokhiber
As an environmentalist I am always skeptical of politicians. I was hoping that some Dean supporters would be willing to verify or debunk this article. If it is true, what were Dean's motives.

Thanks in advance!

Howard Clinton?
by Robert Weissman and Russell Mokhiber; November 15, 2003
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=37&ItemID=4505

Howard Dean is a man with strong Clinton-esque tendencies.

He's a self-described triangulator.

Say good words about the environment.

Take some positive action.

Schmooze with the environmentalists.

But when push comes to shove, don't offend the powers that be.

Mark Sinclair is an senior attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation in Vermont.

Sinclair was dismissed in 2001 from Dean's Council of Environmental Advisers because of his criticisms of the Governor.

Sinclair says that two utilities in Vermont -- Green Mountain Power and Central Vermont Public Service -- along with IBM -- control the state.

"Dean is in the pockets of the utilities and of IBM," Sinclair told us. "Whatever the major economic interest, he's beholden to them."

More http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=37&ItemID=4505
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. dean
Sour grapes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't Clinton
Edited on Tue Nov-18-03 10:08 AM by BayCityProgressive
nationalize more waterways and land for conservation than any other president? From what I recall, for having a GOP legislature he did pretty well and I am not even a huge Clinton fan. He also was cleaning up toxic sites at I believe 180 a month or year or something. under Bush that has gone down to 40.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiLempa Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. and the article?
What is your take on the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Dean is a longtime corporatist masquerading as a populist.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-03 10:13 AM by blm
Amazing how the corporate media has controlled and promoted that perception of him as a populist.

btw....Howie is more of a centrist than Bill. Clinton was a centrist with the core of a liberal, while Dean governed as a centrist with the core principles of a deregulating Libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Largest employer outside of State Gov is Ins Co - Nat'l Life of Vermont
Edited on Tue Nov-18-03 10:15 AM by papau
Dairy farmer power is huge.

Mark Sinclair is over the top as senior attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation in Vermont - a bad choice of persons to interview for unbiased facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiLempa Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. and the article?
How is Sinclair over the top? What is your take on the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. With 500,000 cows, and 500,000 people, green field use for a plant
site is just about a given. Indeed there are areas of the state that no one claims so they are State jurisdiction only.

But I agree with Elizabeth Courtney of the Vermont Natural Resources Council. " "He very much knows what he thinks," Sinclair says. "He doesn't listen very well. He's very sure of himself. He shoots from the hip a lot. He doesn't believe in surrounding himself with a lot of strong leaders. He's smart, so he seems to know what the public wants to hear." " is pretty much the way I know him - but I do not see that personality as a problem - and I doubt that anyone who has worked directly with the CEO of company with more than 100 employees would find Dean tough to deal with comparatively.

Unlike Bush he can say "I was wrong" and move on to a new policy. And he is open to logic. What Courtney misses is the fact that jobs are so scarce in Vermont, that getting jobs and keeping jobs is the Gov's job one.

As to the quality of the article - it is well written and uses 2 of the better qualified critics of Dean as sources. I love Vermont, and the people of Vermont, but I found that many were very, very, serious about their causes - to the point that friends on the left not only could not be joked with about those causes - which is rather reasonable - but you could not express dislike for a comment that a GOP'er had made about the cause, because you were repeating the anti-cause comment. And that is over the top for me.

I am for anyone but Bush - ABB

And that includes Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Missing the point
From the article:

"Instead of telling that developer to build in an industrial park, he showed them a greenfield and allowed them to build in a greenfield," Sinclair said. "Convert farmfields into pavement. Once again, when there was a conflict between sprawl and big development, the Governor Dean sided with big development."

Dean could have, but didn't, insist that IBM build an industrial park. If he had, other companies wouldn't have to convert greenfields. Instead, they could move into the IBM-built industrial park, reducing sprawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. However, Sinclair is pretty good person to talk to if you want to know the
politics behind his dismissal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well we know that Dean isn't "anti free trade"
We know Dean spent his time as Chair of the Governor's Association pimping for Nafta. We know that he and the rest of the pro-Nafta politicians made sure that NO environmental or labor protections were included in the trade agreements. We know that Dean and his ilk pushed for fast-track authority to make sure labor and environmental protections wouldn't be included. We know that Dean agreed with "free trade" even though GATT make environmental and labor protections ILLEGAL.

We now know that Dean is indistinguishable from Bush on the matter of "free trade", along with Clark and Kerry.

Our alternatives to the "free traders"? Gephardt, Kucinich, Sharpton, Moseley-Braun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Edwards isn't a free trader either.
He's voted to protect NC mnfg jobs when they were threatened by free trade, and he has said as much in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. "IBM wanted it, so Dean went along."
Despite his professed love of rail transit, Dean pushed development of a major highway project around Burlington, even though he knew it would be disastrous for land use planners.

IBM wanted it, so Dean went along.

Why did IBM want it?

According to Sinclair, IBM has a major facility in the area and Big Blue wanted to make the taxpayers pay for the road improvements.

This is one thing that Bush's EPA and Dean agree on -- build the beltway around Burlington. The environmental community in Vermont is opposed.

The Burlington highway fight is typical of Dean. He actually cares about light rail, and prefers it to more highways, according to Sinclair. But when push came to shove, he didn't dare stand up to IBM's demands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Let me speak on this!
We vacation in VT this summer near Smuggler's Notch. I got to be pretty good friends with the owner of the place, he's a republican. Anyway, he couldn't stop criticizing Dean because, to him, he pandered to environmentalists (Trustafarians as he called them), in doing so lost that highway and tons of IBM jobs as a result. He also criticized all the time spent on the civil unions thing. Point is, you can't please everyone all the time and I think Dean did the best he could. Actually, I'm pleased you told me about the rail stuff. I like him more yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC