|
Edited on Wed Nov-19-03 10:11 AM by JackRiddler
on how radically the dollar is devalued, and how quickly.
According to the standard pollyanna economists, a gradual devaluation is supposed to help with the trade deficit and potentially bring export-oriented jobs to the States. But there is no evidence that this is happening; the trade deficit is up again this month, despite the ongoing dollar slide.
In fact, 2/3 of all imports to the U.S. are actually within companies, e.g. American companies importing parts or services sold to their own domestic divisions, or big U.S. retailers bringing in products made by manufacturers they own abroad. These companies are not going to see a big incentive to pull production out of Indonesia, China or Mexico and shift it to the U.S. just because of a small drop in the dollar; U.S. wages will still be much higher than in those countries. Furthermore, a drop in the dollar may depress U.S. demand, further cutting the incentive to bring productive investment to the U.S. (and putting downward pressure on the dollar).
The largest single chunk of imports to the U.S. is of petroleum; demand for this will not be dropping soon unless the U.S. economy itself begins to shrink, and our increasingly depleted domestic oil resources cannot serve to replace a significant proportion of the foreign oil.
How far could the dollar drop?
Basically, the value of the dollar is insupportable based on the actual financial data. The U.S. has run high trade deficits for more than 30 years. Japan, China, Europe and others produce in exchange for our air-dollars, while the U.S. consumes and consumes. This cannot be kept up forever, but the whole world economy is currently oriented to demand from the supposedly inexhaustible pockets of the U.S. consumer. They, in turn, have been spending on ever-available credit, for many years now. (One euphemism used to describe this is "negative savings," i.e. spending more than you earn.)
The foreign producers are themselves trapped in this mutual dependence, but if U.S. consumers stop buying, the house of cards comes down. They will be left with a surplus of productive capacity in the form of at-first empty factories, but Americans will be left with their devaluated air-dollars. Who do you think holds the initial advantage for the future then?
The whole world is awash in dollars that could never actually be backed by the value of American production. These have been pumped into U.S. assets, which are inflated as a result. Everyone knows this, but no major foreign investors have an incentive to pull out of U.S. assets too quickly, or they will cause the asset markets to plunge. The big investors are pulling out, gradually.
Another pillar of the dollar is in its use as the marker for oil prices. Everyone needs oil, so they need to hold dollars to buy it, and they have a further incentive to send their goods to the U.S. in exchange for our air-dollars. However, this petrodollar hegemony is deeply unstable because of the increasing use of the euro. Iraq had switched to euro pricing, which was one reason Saddam had to go. Now, Russia has switched to euro pricing - are we going to invade Russia to change this? If OPEC follows this example, the dollar is in big trouble!
So we are looking at a high chance of a dollar meltdown, for several reasons. A radical and rapid devaluation would trigger inflation in the States, depress U.S. consumer demand, and seriously erode the attractiveness of U.S. investments, probably without seriously reducing the trade deficit as a percentage of GDP. The only advantage to this is that the crushing U.S. total debt is denominated in dollars, so it becomes easier to pay off. (Most countries, when they devalue their currency, get killed because their debt is denominated in dollars; the U.S. has the advantage of being the center of this dollar-denominated world.)
However, that debt really is crushing: higher than the levels of 1929 in all categories. I'm talking about private, corporate and government debt - with as you know the highest federal deficits in history, more than 50 percent financed by investment in T-bills from abroad. Debt has financed a very long free ride, but this is dependent on the world's goodwill. Don't expect that to last forever, either.
A bad pickle, on the whole.
|