TNOE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:13 PM
Original message |
|
Interesting - I don't see any rah-rah's or flag waving only complete denial.... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1025688/posts
|
eileen_d
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-20-03 12:16 PM by eileen_d
Right now I'm more fearful of Michael Jackson than the draft board.
Well, at least we know this freeper's been downing their daily dose of cable "news" :eyes:
|
wysimdnwyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well this explains a lot: |
|
"...what was the Clinton response to the political embarrassment in August 1998 because he had been caught telling absolutely perjurious testimony about Monica Lewinsky? Ultimately it lead to September 11, 2001." - post #6 by Harris
So Clinton having an affair is responsible for 9/11. No wonder the freepers hate him so much! :dunce:
|
StClone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Freepers need a legal lesson |
|
"telling absolutely perjurious testimony"
Clinton told a lie. He didn't commit perjury. The difference is not semantics put a legal definition. A lie in context to testimony that would have no bearing on a case is not perjury.
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Thats so typical of right wingers. They love wars but they dont want to fight in them.
|
RobertSeattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Someone should search old FP threads for Clinton Era "Overextended" crap |
|
It was RW mantra during the late 90's that Clinton had "overextended" the US Military with Peace Keeping missions, etc. Clinton's deployments are childs play compared to Bush.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Who got in there and said "General Rove"
|
bushisanidiot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
7. They'll Leave The Repukes When Their Children Get Drafted |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
8. The freeps are not very enthused about their kids getting drafted |
TNOE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
this thread died a very quick death. Somehow they don't think any of their kids will be going apparently. And NOBODY was for it.
|
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
How many of you would support a draft if it came to that...
I would only support a draft if our volunteer numbers dropped to a dangerously low level.
...or would you enlist or encourage your children to enlist?
All males are already required to register by law. This has been true for 30+ years.
That's called registering, not enlisting.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message |