Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 07:54 PM
Original message |
Statement by the 9-11 Commission - November 20, 2003 |
|
Statement by the 9-11 Commission
November 20, 2003 – At its meeting yesterday evening, the Commission voted to issue a subpoena to the City of New York for documents crucial to its investigation that the City has failed to produce in response to a document request issued more than four months ago.
The documents covered by the subpoena include tapes and transcripts of emergency (911) calls that are critical to understanding the interaction between members of the public and the City on September 11, 2001. The subpoena also requires the City to produce transcripts of hundreds of historical interviews of firefighters conducted by the FDNY after the 9-11 attacks. These transcripts will contribute significantly to the Commission’s understanding of the performance of the FDNY on September 11.
The City’s failure to produce these important documents has significantly impeded the Commission’s investigation. Given its statutory deadline, the Commission cannot wait any longer for these vital records.
Yesterday the Commission also selected the Commissioners and staff who will serve on the team reviewing PDB articles pursuant to the Commission’s agreement with the White House:
• The Commission requested access to years of articles from the President’s Daily Brief that are relevant to the Commission’s work. There are hundreds of such PDB articles. The agreement provides access to all the requested PDB articles.
• The Commission has selected four representatives—the Chair, the Vice Chair, Commissioner Gorelick, and the Executive Director—as its review team. They will examine the core group of PDB articles made up of those that are plainly critical to the Commission’s investigation, including PDB articles involving threats to the U.S. homeland.
• Notes taken by the four representatives on the PDB articles will be kept at the White House and may be reviewed at any time by the representatives. The four representatives will also prepare a summary for all Commissioners and designated staff. That summary is subject to limited White House review before it is shared with the full Commission. The four representatives will have “wide latitude” in preparing the summary and briefing the full Commission.
• Two members of the Commission review team—Commissioner Gorelick and the Executive Director—will review the entire group of several hundred responsive PDB articles to determine whether there are any that are demonstrably critical to the Commission’s mandate and should therefore be added to the core group and summarized for the full Commission. The criteria for adding such articles to the core group are that they are material, important to the Commission’s mandate, and provide significant knowledge not otherwise available to the Commission. In conducting this review of the complete group of responsive PDB articles, the two representatives may take limited notes and consult the Chair and the Vice Chair. Any transfer of articles to the core group will require White House agreement.
• In the event the Commission does not obtain the material it needs, the Commission retains the right to take any actions it deems appropriate. The Commission believes that this agreement should provide a mechanism for obtaining the access it needs to fulfill its mandate.
AL FELZENBERG, DEPUTY FOR COMMUNICATIONS National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Office: 202-401-1725 ? Cell: 202-236-4878 ? Fax: 202-296-5545 afelzenberg@9-11commission.gov
|
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
- Only four representatives from the commission will be able to see the Presidential Daily Briefings...they can only take notes...and CAN'T even take their notes away from the White House.
- What good is an investigation with such restraints?
- The Bush* White House should be charged with obstruction of justice.
|
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. This is important stuff... |
|
...you're not required to respond...but at least READ it and be aware.
|
Sterling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
and bookmarked.Get off your asses lazy DUers and make some noise about this stuff!
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. dire threats against NY City if they don't respond |
|
no worries and no big deal if the WH obstructs justice.
LIHOP or worse is at the bottom of this.
|
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
- Strange how they're getting all over NYC...but tolerate Bush's* obstruction and delay tactics. Worse...they've made a 'deal' with the White House that will guarantee nothing will be found to incriminate the Bushies.
|
davsand
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Well, gee, what kind of Federal funding does NYC need? |
|
You can bet it was at risk if they cooperated with the investigation. My guess is all it too was one or two phone calls to the Mayor and those 911 tapes probably vanished to the same place the JFK films and witness reports went so many years ago...
I have no doubt the city of New York was given intructions by somebody from the White Louse...
Laura
|
Minstrel Boy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yeah, what's with that? |
|
Of course NYC ought to cooperate, but no more so than the White House, which has far more to hide.
|
knight_of_the_star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. There is more key info hiding |
|
Under Bush's bed. I think he CAN get slapped with an obstruction charge, but I know that the current DoJ will just order the charge to be dropped.
|
Wwagsthedog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-20-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Is it apropos to mention the warren commission? |
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. A kick in the memory... |
Octafish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-03 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. History will not be kind to the Traitors behind 9-11... |
|
...nor to their lickspittles on this commission.
|
JAbuchan08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-22-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. A kick for transparency in government |
DUreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-03 02:04 PM
Response to Original message |
phillybri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-03 02:11 PM
Response to Original message |
DUreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-03 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-03 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Anyone Who has obstructed this Investigation are Traitors |
|
traitors to the People our National Security and to the Country itself . :grr:
|
tom_paine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-03 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
people should see this...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message |