Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fairness Doctrine- is it coming back?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:42 PM
Original message
Fairness Doctrine- is it coming back?
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 02:43 PM by Cat Atomic
Have any of the candidates addressed the issue of bringing back the Fairness Doctrine and giving the FCC some teeth? If a Democrat wins the next presidential election, that person will clearly need to to dismantle the huge conservative propaganda machine and bring back some semblance of honest reporting. If they don't, they'll be setting themselves up for failure on every front.

Anyway- have any of the candidates addressed the issue? Would it be considered politically damaging to do that at this point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. They could mention it now
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 02:47 PM by Cush
But it would be the kiss of death. If I remember correctly, before the 2000 Election, Rove called the networks and told them that Bush supported deregulation, which would allow them to own more stations, but Gore was against it.

And well all know what happened during the campaign....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olacan Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. When
was it removed and who removed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It was removed by Reagan in, I believe, 1984 (hmmmm)
An appropriate year to get rid of it, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/052203A.shtml


"PITT: You're talking about reinstating the Fairness Doctrine.

DEAN: Yes, reinstating controls over how many outlets you can own in any particular media market. The media has clearly abused their privilege, and it is hurting our democracy. Deregulation in many areas has simply proved to be bad for America, bad for the American economy, bad for the average working person, and bad for democracy. We need to take a different view. Some deregulation is a good thing. We went too far, and now we need to cut back."


:hippie:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. fair and balanced
the fairness doctrine may never come back. now we all know what "the power of the press" really meant. in a way, the media, press, and all print media, went the way of all other sacred institutions. one way, the only way, to grab it back is "revolution."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clark.
"Clark said he supports the fairness doctrine, which requires equal air time for candidates or others expressing alternative points of view."

more

Citizen Online
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. A hugh problem to undo
The Fairness Doctrine was hated by the RW because it was so fair that it was unfair. There's this belief that if you have enough money and power then you should be able to shut out all others.

They contend that it is unfair to require broadcasters to devote a small portion of their broadcast resource(worth billions but given to them for free)to a provide candidates equal time. It is better that they receive millions and millions in revenue for political ads that serve little purpose but to rake the opponent through the mud.

I think media consolidation is the big problem and this will be tough to undo since the top media companies are now a hughly powerful lobby. The argument is that there are so many broadcast/cable resources available, that everyone can get some time.

There must first be regime change at the FCC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC