Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"How to stay out of the military" (Must read - especially ages 16-20)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:17 PM
Original message
"How to stay out of the military" (Must read - especially ages 16-20)
This is a fantastic page on how to legally stay out of the draft and the best way to get a CO (write I AM A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR TO WAR IN ANY FORM when you fill out the registration application). This page cannot be beat. Gives draft counseling info too.

http://www.duckdaotsu.org/resist.html

<snip>

Registering But Resisting Induction

If you decide to register:


• Find a post office for your registration that has an accessible photocopier.
• Print in legible black ink across the middle of the registration form: I AM A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR TO WAR IN ANY FORM. This is not a classification, but it may help you later to document your position as a CO. Selective Service makes no record of this declaration in its computer files, but they do make a microfilm record of the registration card. You should make a copy of your card for your file.
• Make a photocopy of your registration form for your own records. Date it, fold and seal it, and mail it to yourself. The postmark confirms the date.
• Put a complete statement of your conscientious objector beliefs on file with your religious body, the CCW, the CCCO, or any other counseling agency.

<snip>

This is just part of this wonderful resource. Let me know what you think. Great links! Except he missed this one that says the draft is being geared up to a 75-day countdown that could start April 1, 2005--and that's no April Fools joke.

Hope I saved a few lives tonight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks
I have 2 sons, one almost 18 and one almost 20. I have acquired some information and have added this. Muchas Gracias
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. The army isnt going to install the draft.
And I wouldnt mind serving in the army if they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why wait? Go join up chump.
I love these armchair generals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Go for it.
Maybe you could help invade and conquer Syria or Iran. PNAC has those countries high on its agenda. Not many christians, just a bunch of muslim brown people, so blasting them shouldn't cause a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. I believe its comin'
almost sure of it. I was around during the last draft and I can tell you it was the centerpiece of all our conversations of the 18 to 21 crowd. Lots of them went to Canada to get out of serving and lots went to VietNam. I was lucky and my number was high so I wasn't called but rest assured I was sweating my arse off until the war was over. I would not judge anyone who decided to dodge. I think the war is bogus and it wouldn't be dishonorable to excuse yourself from the draft. If the war was necessary I may feel differently but I'm not sure of that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. Bush 2004+PNAC=Draft. You had better belive it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Oh no? Then why is Bush spending $28 min '04 to make DRAFT ready (read!)
http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html

What say you now, kalishnikov? The first Draft Lottery would be June 15, 2005 after Bush asks Congress for troops--just to maintain the 100,000 the Pentagon said they will maintain thru 2006!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I really think that they would shift troops out of Europe before a draft,
it would make the GOP impotent for years to come, and theres nothing they like more than power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. They have been shifting troops out of Europe.
They're grabbing everybody from every corner they can. I know a guy that played in the armed forces band that is now in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Arent there still some 100,000 troops over there?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Hey, they don't have any worries
about losing power; they'll just continue stealing elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Why wait?
Sign up now! Bush just increased the death 'benefit' to $12K!

Just go here: http://www.goarmy.com/army101/twopaths.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
falcon Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Go for it!
I did back in 1967 and I'm still fucked up from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. You're talking the talk, now walk the walk
Join up now or you're blowing steam out your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. When I graduate from college I plan on doing so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. Fair enough.
Are you in ROTC now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #45
60. No, wouldnt work with my schedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. By golly, you're RIGHT! no Draft!
Maybe they'll send out "Press Gangs", just pull up on campus with the busses with the wire-grid windows, bring in the MPs with the dogs, and just round up 8-900 young fellows and load 'em up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. then why aren't you serving NOW??>?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. Boy do you need help
I'm sure there is a recruiter that can accomodate you.... Think about all those neat guns that you can fondle and grope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Weeell...I do like guns...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. It is a dangerous world. We still need people like Kalishnikov as much
as I wish we didn't. But the Volunteer Army is by far a better way to go. Bush just fucked it all up and now we're going to be 75 days from the DRAFT on March 31, 2005.

Thank you Kalishnikov, and if you finally do catch Osama--give a DU rebel yell!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalashnikov Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Hooyah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. Go for it...
The PNAC Neo-clown crowd loves U man.

send us a card from Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. go for it, dude
someone has to do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. French kiss a man...
...or a woman if you are female, in front of your recruiter. Get it on film, and send a copy to your local TV station. That will keep you out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "You mean, like flaming?"
"No, neither of us are homesexual, but we ARE willing to learn."

"Would they send us someplace special for that?"

-- Harold Ramis & Bill Murray, "Stripes"


"If two people walk in, sing a bar of Alice's Restaurant, and walk out... they'll think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them..." --Arlo Guthrie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yup! You got it.
But you gotta be willing to work with it. I was in the service, and I know they are going to call your bluff, and they are going to watch you. If they are suspicious enough, and they are feeling vindictive, they will watch you for months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
46. I was wondering when someone
was going to bring up that quote. Makes me laugh every time.

Hey Kalishnikov, follow your dreams! Some people are meant to be warriors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. My humble advice:
expect anything. If they say 'no', chalk it up as a 'yes'. I read last week here at DU that they were hitting up Fiji for troops. I laughed for about 5 minutes, then I realized they really are coming up short.

EXPECT them to restart the draft. If I were a young healthy male between the ages of 18 and 26 (and they're more likely to start with the younger ones), be proactive. Do everything you can to stay informed. Here at the DU, we will probably be the first ones to know because we've got the jungle drums going.

Please do not allow yourselves to get pulled into a war over oil and corporate profits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. you're getting obsessed
starting a couple of topics a day about the draft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Matt! Was worried you were sick or something. Glad you're here!
Did you see how the Pentagon now says they'll keep 100,000 troops through 2006? Where are they getting those troops Matt? Keep in mind they will not deploy anyone twice. Unless of course you volunteer to deploy a second time...

You said you were of course concerned about the draft and so I was wondering if this new fact made you a little more concerned, a lot more concerned or still feel there's very little chance the draft would start on June 15, 2005.

Also, do you know? Would they really draft doctors up to 50? Can you help me find that out? Someone said that and it's hard to believe.

I wonder if it's on that sss.gov site?

Maybe I could draft one of those doctors and they could help me with this obsession!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. thanks
we're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one

drafting doctors up to 50? no i cant ever imagine that happening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. It's OK I found the page. You're right! It's not 50 -- it's 45!
And Matt, if the draft comes back they will draft women this time -- if they are doctors, nurses, Specialists or "healthcare Professionals".

All doctors and nurses will be forced to register immediately after the election if I am right about the 2005 draft.

From the official SSS site:

MEDICAL DRAFT IN STANDBY MODE

The Health Care Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) is a standby plan developed for the Selective Service System at the request of Congress. If needed it would be used to draft health care personnel in a crisis. It is designed to be implemented in connection with a national mobilization in an emergency, and then only if Congress and the President approve the plan and pass and sign legislation to enact it. No portion of the plan is designed for implementation in peacetime. If implemented, HCPDS would:

Provide a fair and equitable draft of doctors, nurses, medical technicians and those with certain other health care skills if, in some future emergency, the military’s existing medical capability proved insufficient and there is a shortage of volunteers.

Include women, unless directed otherwise by Congress and the President.

Draft a very small percentage of America’s health care providers into military service. Impact on the availability of civilian health care would be minimal. Those health-care workers whose absence would seriously hurt their communities would be deferred on the basis of community essentiality.

Begin a mass registration of male and female health care workers between the ages of 20 and 45. They would register at local post offices. HCPDS would provide medical personnel from a pool of 3.4 million doctors, nurses, specialists and allied health professionalsin more than 60 fields of medicine.

Require minimal training for HCPDS draftees, because they are already skilled personnel.

http://www.sss.gov/FSmedical.htm

No wonder the healthcare union wants Dr. Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. i had always thought
any draft of medical professionals would be needed for a domestic WMD attack but who knows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. They wouldn't draft many but they all 3.4 million would have to register
at their local post office. It just says national emergency (already declared for 9-11 I believe). Getting the HCPDS ready is their number 1 priority in the 2004 "Performance" Plan (really a readiness plan) as they would need to start registering them all by June 15, 2005 if * pulls the trigger and they have no real apparatus it looks like at this point to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. Let's see, go to Iraq, or give up my nursing license...
hmmm, tough decision. Actually, I'll be over 45. Maybe they won't want me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. CO's will NOT be exempt...they will still be sent into war zones but..
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 11:25 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
without a gun...they will be either made medics or put on supply lines or in a position where they will not have to carry a gun...but they will be sent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Alternative Service allows COs who say they can't even serve in the
military to be placed in other government jobs"

CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE Printer Friendly Version

A conscientious objector is one who is opposed to serving in the armed forces and/or bearing arms on the grounds of moral or religious principles.

HOW TO APPLY
In general, once a man gets a notice that he has been found qualified for military service, he has the opportunity to make a claim for classification as a conscientious objector (CO). A registrant making a claim for Conscientious Objection is required to appear before his local board to explain his beliefs.

He may provide written documentation or include personal appearances by people he knows who can attest to his claims. His written statement might explain:

how he arrived at his beliefs; and

the influence his beliefs have had on how he lives his life.

The local board will decide whether to grant or deny a CO classification based on the evidence a registrant has presented.

A man may appeal a Local Board's decision to a Selective Service District Appeal Board. If the Appeal Board also denies his claim, but the vote is not unanimous, he may further appeal the decision to the National Appeal Board. See also Classifications.

WHO QUALIFIES?
Beliefs which qualify a registrant for CO status may be religious in nature, but don't have to be. Beliefs may be moral or ethical; however, a man's reasons for not wanting to participate in a war must not be based on politics, expediency, or self-interest. In general, the man's lifestyle prior to making his claim must reflect his current claims.

SERVICE AS A CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR
Two types of service are available to conscientious objectors, and the type assigned is determined by the individual's specific beliefs. The person who is opposed to any form of military service will be assigned to Alternative Service - described below. The person whose beliefs allow him to serve in the military but in a noncombatant capacity will serve in the Armed Forces but will not be assigned training or duties that include using weapons.

ALTERNATIVE SERVICE
Conscientious Objectors opposed to serving in the military will be placed in the Selective Service Alternative Service Program. This program attempts to match COs with local employers. Many types of jobs are available, however the job must be deemed to make a meaningful contribution to the maintenance of the national health, safety, and interest. Examples of Alternative Service are jobs in:

conservation

caring for the very young or very old

education

health care

Length of service in the program will equal the amount of time a man would have served in the military, usually 24 months.

http://www.sss.gov/FSconsobj.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. Bush was involved in this election
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030703-15.html

Presidential Envoy James Baker to Visit Tbilisi, Georgia
Statement by the Press Secretary
Visit by Presidential Envoy James Baker to Tbilisi, Georgia

Former Secretary of State James Baker will visit Tbilisi, Georgia on July 4 and 5 on behalf of President Bush. The mission's primary objective will be to discuss with Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze ways to advance political and economic reform in Georgia through free and fair Parliamentary elections this fall. Mr. Baker will also discuss U.S. -Georgian cooperation on counterterrorism and other security matters. The Baker mission reflects the United States' readiness to work with all Georgian citizens who are committed to advancing reform and fighting corruption in pursuit of a democratic, prosperous, and stable Georgia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. Thanks I am 16
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 12:58 PM by JohnKleeb
Now I cant be drafted anyhow but still thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Actually this thread should be read by anyone who's 16 to 24
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. which I am, I am 16
I cant be drafted due to a heart condition but I fear that Bush and Co will find some way to make me eligible. I am afraid of guns to begin with!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Can't you just say that you're gay?
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 10:12 PM by Hippo_Tron
I mean if they started accepting homosexuals into the military then, it would be just a tad bit hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. I don't think that would work anymore
I expect them to set up Homosexual Regiments to deal with all the men who've suddenly turned gay as a result of being called up.

A regiment of gay infantrymen, a regiment of gay artillerymen and a few battalions of gay engineers. Perfect! They'll get their chance to serve their country, they'll play a leading role in the fight against terrorism, and did I happen to mention that those are the three best branches to send people you want dead? The casualty rates of infantry, artillery and engineers are extremely high when rounds start flying in earnest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I just don't think the GOP can play that one off...
We don't want gays in the military, unless we ABSOLUTELY need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. They will ask you directly if you are a practicing homsexual
When they asked my friend winked and said flirtingly:

"What do you mean by that??"

Then they said have you recently had sex with a man?

He said: "Oh yes!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trek234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
56. I think they would do something like that
After the war we would probably find out about tons of crimes, however. Similar to african americans in earlier wars being the first in line to get the most dangerous jobs, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. Anyone in high school right now should take this seriously.
Got teenagers? ABB in 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. What's ABB?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
44. Very simple. Don't enlist. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Eyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
49. Bump
Just trying to get some decent threads to the top, ahead of the hacker mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
50. I Post This To My Local Papers Editorial Page
Thanks! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuseONE Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. .
What about showing up high and/or drunk to your physical?? I heard Jim Morisson did that and they couldn't get him out of there fast enough, haha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
52. asthma will keep you out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karabekian Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
53. out of Europe
I agree that we will remove troops from Europe before a draft. We should do that anyways. I think Germany is stable and I am tired of picking up the bill for their defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. the troops aren't in Germany because of "stability"
At least not officially. Germany is a sovereign nation - the American Soldiers are there as guests.
The Bases are mostly empty anyway (guarded by the German Army). The Infrastructure is the interesting part: Airbases, Hospitals, supply stations, etc. No use in moving them anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trek234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. HAHAHAHA
Defense? Haven't heard someone say this since I last visited Free Republic.

Germany does not need US defense - you can be damn sure of that. Not only are they at zero risk for being majorly attacked - they also have the entire EU behind them. Part of the EU is the mutual defense of a member nation. In other words if you attack Germany you potentially have to worry about every other EU nation engaging you.

Even if in some fantasy land situation Germany were to be conquered, you can be fairly certain the other European nations are not going to wait around to be next in line should Germany totally fall. They've learned from WW2.

The US threatened to leave Germany before prior to the Iraq war when Germany would not go along with the scheme. The German people said thank you! - get the f*ck out. Because it's exactly what they want the US to do.

The US doesn't defend Germany - they just occupy space they shouldn't be occupying to begin with.

And of course Germany is 100% stable. The United States has a greater chance to loose stability than Germany at this point in time if you look at the proportion of internal conflict that exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
58. My uncle's "peanut-butter" solution:
This is true (I think):

Before the physical, he put peanut butter all over his ass. Then during the physical he reached in there with his hand, grabbed a generous quantity and proceeded to eat it. He got off on a section 11 (or whatever that one you get when yu're crazy is).

Anyway, it may be apocryphal but I know he didn't go to 'Nam...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC