Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you support the re-redistricting of Illinois?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:24 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you support the re-redistricting of Illinois?
Here's the article from www.politics1.com:

IL DEMS THREATEN CONGRESSIONAL REMAPPING. State Senate President Emil Jones (D-IL) this week filed a bill to have Illinois redraw congressional districts in the state for the 2004 elections to create more Democratic seats. The bill has no specifics yet -- and Jones conceded to the Chicago Sun-Times that he filed it "in case we want to do something." He said the move would be in direct response to the recent Texas redistricting plan adopted at the request of US House Majority Leader Tom Delay (R-TX). Congressman Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) joked to the newspaper that the bill should be entitled "The Tom DeLay Retribution Act." A mirror opposite of Texas, in Illinois the Democrats control the governorship and both houses of the state legislature. The current Illinois Congressional delegation is 10 Republicans and 9 Democrats. Experts believe a plan could be crafted that could possible shift the state to as much as 11 Democrats and 8 Republicans under redrawn lines. The new Texas map is designed to give the GOP 5-7 additional seats in that state. The new Illinois plan could be presented as early as January 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mndemocrat_29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. By the way, the article doesn't say which seats will be vulnerable
Does anyone know which Republicans would be sent out of their districts? It says two, which two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. If they do things right, my Repuke asshole Congressperson
could lose it. Herr district has been altered irrevocably in the past two years with urban sprawl. Lots of people from the city are now suburbanites in Judy Biggert's district.

I can hope. I was represented by Schakowsky and then Emanuel whilst living in the city. I'm now in Repuke country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Republicans started this crap
We have no choice. They declared war, now we must counter attack even more brutally than we were originally attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I concur. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do not stoop to their level.
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 10:43 AM by JohnLocke
I propose a law forcing all congressional districts to have no more than six sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. advantageous redistricting started way before Texas guys
so if they want to, have at it. it'll be subject to federal review but so is Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. ideally, neither Texas nor illinois would be redistricted
Ideally, neither Texas nor illinois would be redistricted mid-decade, but since the Repbulicans started this, the Democrats need to respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. You know, I'd wondered about that...
Seemed like they opened a whole can of worms down there in Texas. I have to admit, I'd love to have my district redrawn. They redid the map to give up David Phelps (A conservative Dem by most standards) and to render the 15th District a gawd awful mess.

If Emil is feeling froggy--then let him jump. I'd support it completely.

Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't believe that Tom Delay's little scheme will stand up in court
But if by chance it does then you better believe I would support redistricting in Illinois and anywhere else we can do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Census should determine districting.
Gerrymandering should be eliminated as a practice. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The census DID determine it
until Tom Delay decided that Texas should be re-redistricted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. So Delay broke the rules, should we toss out the rule book?
Or keep the fight in Texas?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. If the courts throw it out, as the should, then NO we should not
However, if they don't then the gloves are off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Do both.
Fight the Texas re-districting in court while trying to re-district Illinois. The best defense is a good offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. What are all those Republicans doing in our congressional
delegation? It's an outrage, I tell you. Where do they think this is? Texas?

I vote for Mark Kirk. Don't know where his district is, but he irritates me. Too bad we can't re-district the House Speaker, Hastert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. Please, Please, Please do this!!
My rep is not only the repuke Crane, he's TOTALLY worthless!! Fight fire with fire, I say!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Hes my rep too, probably one of the worst repukes in Congress!
Lets send him packing!

But I read that Mike Madigan doesnt want it done, so I dont think anything will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. if there was
someway to get rid of my wonderful rep,denny know nothing hastrett, well that would be fine. but then my state rep might be changed and that wouldn`t be good,even though he`s a republican, he`s not a norquist stormtrooper.the truth be know many of the republicans in this state are not neo`s but regular republicans..but that`s il politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. This Is War
All weapons available must be used to destroy the Republican reactionaries grip on the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. no.
if we're trying to save the constitution, why go against it so flagrantly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. You damn betcha!
In fact, it's a survival imperative. Screw Mike Madigan! This is war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes!
Not to really succeed in doing it, but to show the repubs the error of their ways. They started down a path that will have many consequences. Illinois redistricting is only one of them. Keep them busy trying to defend their position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. No, that is the wrong approach
I don't like the idea of redistricting, but I do like the threat of a redistricting. I would like to see a very public spectacle of it, because I think that the Texas redistricting was probably not understood by most people. But if the Democrats threaten to do this, especially in Dennis Hastert's own state, I would expect the GOP to complain very loudly, which will hopefully garner more public attention to what they have been doing. Unfortunately, I am stuck in Henry Hyde's district, and no amount of redistricting will get rid of that asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. Only in honor of Tom Delay
In principle I believe redistricting should only occur, as has traditionally been the case for years, once a decade. But Dems can't keep laying down when pricks like Delay are coming at us with both barrels. IL should re-redistrict and so should any states with Democratic-controlled legislatures that can feasibly manage it. Should the TX travesty hold up in court the Dems are going to need to pick up several seats wherever they can; if breaking custom is necessary- especially considering the break was initiated by the Re:puke:s in the first place, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
25. As long as the districts are "compact and contiguous."
I hope the Illinois Dems follow the Texas model to the letter in that regard...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doomsayer13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. No
it makes us look like a bunch of hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Do it! Get rid of Hyde and Hastert!
Send Dickhead De Lay a nice message from the Land of Lincoln!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. I do *not* support re-districting.
IL lawfully re-drew its districts following the 2000 Census, and the commission had a majority of Democrats on it; the map was upheld by the courts.

To now re-district would set a precedent which could easily come back to bite Democrats in the a**, if it were permitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC