Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Accusations of "draft dodging" in politicians...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 02:15 AM
Original message
Accusations of "draft dodging" in politicians...
This has robbed us of some potentially great leaders. I deeply respect people like Clark and Kerry, who have served their country in the military. But there have been other great leaders who did not serve in the military, and who served our country or communities in other valuable ways.

My beloved Dad ran for local office and won, and worked his keister off for our community, making some wonderful improvements to our city's infrastructure. However, he was attacked by jealous rivals for "draft dodging" because of a medical deferment. Though he was re-elected, he was deeply hurt by the dirty politics, and did not run for a third term. The people lost out on a good leader, because it was all too easy for rivals to attack him and paint him as a coward. It robbed him of his ambition to serve our community, and our country, in other very valuable ways, and it robbed the people of an effective, passionate public servant.

It's important to remember that one can serve one's country in many, many ways. The military is but one of them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Blessed are the peacemakers"
Not only can one serve, it is often far more difficult to take a different road in that service.

Strange as it may seem, the paths of war and violence are often the easy way to resolve a conflict. In all cases, they are a failure of other means.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. In about 7 years, the whole question will be moot anyway
Since the draft ended in the early 70's, anyone who will be running after 7 years or so have passed, would be too old to consider a run if the draft is an issue, and anyone younger would not have been draftable anyway..

It really only mattered for Clinton anyway.. The VRWC hated him so much that they used it.. Apparently the press gave and is going to continue to give * a pass.. By the time 2008 rolls around, any vietnam era guys would probably be too old to have a chance at running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC