Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is the most Corrupt President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:35 PM
Original message
Who is the most Corrupt President?
This is not a poll.


One can pick from any of the US Presidents. Or even a top 5 most corrupt Presidents list would be entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1. Bush II 2. Rayguns 3. Bush I 4. Nixon 5. LBJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, George Washingon owned slaves and killed more Native
Americans than George W. Bush did. However, I suspect Dubya is the most corrupt U.S. president since the early 20th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Gotta agree.
There was also Nixon, a close second, but even Nixon had a line he would'nt cross, but Dubya is absolutely corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. George Washington, a corrupt president?
Think that over a moment. There would be no USA if not for Washington.

I wish we had someone of his caliber in the White House now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdove Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is so obvious to see with affairs like Enron (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. of modern presidents
LBJ, #1, for pulling off an assassination

#2, Shrub, for all the reasons we discuss here

#3 Reagan for his illegal iran/contra thing

#4 Nixon, for numerous reasons

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are you implying...
...that Johnson had Kennedy killed? I have not heard about that one. I just thought that he through misguided reasoning got the US in Vietnam. Tell me more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
12.  calling bullshit on the LBJ smear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. hey, how come you're not mad at "tacit approval of a coup de tat"
below?

yeesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. that's been rectified
nothing personal, but the other post wasn't there earlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. 1. Bush II 2. Nixon 3. Harding, Reagan - who cares? 1 and 2 rule
Never thought I would see a more corrupt administration than Nixon's, but starting a preemptive war on the basis of lies has got to go to the top. We won't even get started on the other lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush II, Harding and Nixon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiobhanClancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. Excellent choices...
I agree with the choices,and the order they are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nixon, Dubya et al, Andrew Johnson, LBJ, Reagan
You all overlooked Andrew Johnson. :P

One thing to learn from these lists.. Oil corrupts absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bush 2
Reagan

Bush 1

Nixon

But that's just the last 30 years.

And after that, the Repugs control the Executive, the Congress and the Supreme court. Americans are hopelessly stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirk39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton...
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 12:16 AM by Dirk39
Hello from Germany! Flame me now!
Bush isn't corrupt, I never had the smallest doubts of what this guy is about. Same is true for his father.
But Clinton somehow lipserved everyone and did just represent corporate interests. He did offend those on welfare and the unemployed in a cynical way, he advertised himself as the healthy guy with the healthy american family, he did use his fabricated private life as a tool to win the election. Besides this, I wouldn't have any problems with his affairs, I don't care about his private life, but he made it an advertising and public relation tool and paid the bill for this.
What he did to the environment in defending corporate interests isn't comparable even to the worst republicans. The war against Yuguslavia was just as illegal and criminal as the war against Iraq. And the terrorists, the UCK, he sold to the world as freedom fighters? I have t0 admit, I'm even convinced that Clinton would have started the war against Iraq, if he would still be the president. He would just have managed it as a kind of multilateral pop-event, preventing a new Ausschwitz. He's making me puke just like Schröder and Blair. Don't get me wrong: I would rather buy Clintons' last CD than Bushs', and he's so smart, but I better live without politicians as him.
Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Standing up for Clinton
Clinton did have his personal problems, but didn't he have a coalition in Bosnia? Also many of the things that you say about Clinton are things that I think of *. Clinton was not perfect, and he may have been corrupt, but at least people were happy and working.
It's all in how you look at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirk39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I don't care for his personal problems....
if he's happy with 124 Monicas and the Monicas are happy, too. Fine with me, have fun. It's not about this. But if you make your faked private life an advertizing column, you shouldn't cry, when your opponents reply on the same level. Didn't have enough time to ask all the american citizens, how happy they were under Clinton. When he was just completely desperate, he did one thing, to give some people work, as a kind of proftit from the neoliberal global cold war, he was a part of. And giving work to some americans for some time was so important for him, that he risked to destabilize dozens of other countries.
I just was so happy when he did win after decades of republicans (same here in Germany with Schröder and in GB with Blair). But it just turned into a nightmare. i will never forget, sitting in my apartment after he did win the election, and having some hope against my own knowledge, and then hearing him making these disgusting statements about unemployed people. At least he prevented me from voting for Schröder here in Germany! Thanx Bill!
Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. that is delusional
First, I agree that he was far more corporatist than I would prefer, but he's not even in the same league as either of the Bushes or Reagan. Not even close. Corporations influenced Clinton, they CONTROL Bush.

Second, he disappointed me on the environment, but again, not even remotely at the level of the current Bush, who would strip mine the planet if someone gave his campaign $100K.

Third, There was no such place as Yugoslavia. Clinton intervened in Bosnia in the face of GENOCIDE. The execution of that intervention was not perfect, but it PALES next to the Bush I and II legacy in Iraq. The Europeans were collectively incapable of cleaning their own house and Clinton took timely and decisive action. Looking at the region now, I'd say he was pretty damned successful. Not perfect, but successful.

I've appreciated your posts, Dirk39, but this one leaves me dumbfounded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirk39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. If you have some time, please
study the role of the IMF and the worldbank in former Yuguslavia, before those "ethnic wars" started, always mixed with economical interests.
Germany played the worst part in this war, esp. Genscher, but Clinton was interested, too. And the lies that were told to us, here in Europe as in the USA, to justify this war are just disgusting.
Did you ever wonder about the reasons, that the trial against Milosovic is just about completely ignored by our media?
Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. That is total crap on Clinton and the environment!
I'm an oceanographer and followed Clinton's environmental agenda with interest. He expanded the Clean Water and Clean Air act. He appointed Carol Browner to the EPA who is a "true believer" environmentalist. The EPA under Clinton agressively pursued corporate polluters including suing many coal fired generation plants that were trying to skirt upgrading air pollution standards. Clinton's administration funded research into hybrid car systems which is probably the best current technology for improving milage. The Clinton administration negotiated the Kyoto treaty for the US. Super Fund cleanups were about 4 times what Shrub has been doing. He had one of the largest expansions of protected species. Banned roads in national forests.

Those are just a few of the environmental gains that occured under Clinton that I can pull off the top of my head. I can fill up pages with gains if I do some research. I can also fill up pages with losses to the environment under the last three Repuke presidents especially the "brown shrub".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirk39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. What about this?
"The image of the Democrats as protectors of flora and fauna has been echoed by the media as well. Yet the Clinton administration's environmental record is almost indistinguishable from that of Republican George Bush. As Jeff St. Clair, editor of the Oregon-based Wild Forest Review, notes, the Clinton administration has been the No. 1 cheerleader for a business-friendly environmentalism that has forsaken pollution prevention in favor of pollution control. "Clinton's policies are similar to Bush's, but Bush was checked by Congress. ...Clinton has been able to implement the type of policies that Bush could only propose."

article

And didn't Clinton make the most "progressive" decision, when it was already clear, that he was lost?
Dirk

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, Harding, Nixon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Dick Cheney
Everyone knows he's running the show and * is the puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bush and Bush are tied
Since they are part of the same outfit.

After that... well there's no comparison. The rest of the presidents are saints compared to the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. George W. Bush cannot possibly be most corrupt president ever
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 12:52 AM by Jack Rabbit
He lost the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. My vote:
#1 worst president: Bush II

#2 worst president: Bush I

This is not to say that Bush I is better than Bush II. It's just that the child is in my face and in my thoughts so much of the time. The dad is more in the background.

Words simply fall short for what I could like to say about the son. I can't. Suffice it to say that this man is the most evil, vile sinister human being (I'm not sure if he is part of our race) that ever walked the face of this earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
23. probably LBJ
tacit approval of a coup de tait has to rank right up there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Bush will definitely go down in history as the worst President ever...
however, we can thank him for being so bad that we will now usher in a new and better era. Bob Marley, John Lennon, MLK, Noam Chomsky, JFK, and Ghandi, are the prophets of a new age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EX-CONservative Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
25. Warren G. Harding
Teapot Dome and dumber than Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. Corruption is so pervasive among Republicans today
they don't even see it as immoral or abnormal anymore. It's like the mafia. It's just a way of doing business. Rove, DeLay, the RNC, big media, big corporations, civic groups, churches, have all become part of a vast, self-promoting power machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bush II, Nixon, Harding, Grant. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Astarho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
32. My Top 5
Bush II
Harding
Nixon
Grant
Hayes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
33. Your choice of verbs is right on-
"who IS the most corrupt president?"

If the answer were anyone but the Lil' Dictator, the verb would be 'was'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Here's my List
1) Nixon
2) Bush II
3) Reagan



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC