General Puke Face, on Whore CNN, just said the attacks are 'irrelevant'

[dArKeR]

in response to the 2 dead soldiers who, it's being reported, had their throats slit.

I'm to the point my entire country is a bunch of hopeless sleaze!

If a Dem. candidate doesn't stand up and condemn that kind of language when the boys' families are watching TV? Oh my gosh, our leaders are far worse more disgusting than I ever imagined and the rot starts with Bush.

Where is General Ken "Clark' Lay's response to this?

[Renew Deal]

1. This reminds me of some other funny thread from earlier in the day.

Similar subject. It got locked, but was funny as hell.

[Selwynn]

2. you should edit your post

just respelling profanity is not going to keep it from being locked.

But I'm angry too!!!

[MidwestTransplant]

3. Scuse me?

His response to what you just saw said on CNN. That would require a quick reaction. Take your little agenda and stuff it.

[Renew Deal]

4. What happened?

Did I miss something?

[1songbird]

5. We are trying to get Clark elected so that this stuff

doesn't happen. I assume we can look for your support since you're asking for his response.

[Renew Deal]

6. What happened?

[1songbird]

10. Apparantly one of the army Generals

called the attacks that occured today "irrelevant". This is a jacked-up statement. What happened to those soldiers was definitely not irrelevant. I do believe that Clark would not tolerate crap like this.

[Renew Deal]

13. OK, thanks. I was worried for a minute

that Clark was the purported "Phuck Face." Thats the sort of line generals would run. They see it as big picture. Big picture, it is probably irrelevant to lose 2-3 out of 150,000. I am not saying I agree with him, but I understand his point of view.

[Renew Deal]

14. And one more thing

You know where they get this from. Presiden Fuck Face who hasn't visited a single dead soldier and is barring the press. That's what they call "Leadership" at yale.

[1songbird]

18. I believe that the desecration of the bodies of the

soldiers is what makes it extremely important. Soldiers being shot is one thing but slitting their throats and desecrating their bodies is totally different. The Iraqi's showed that they really hate us and it's personal now to them. These are people in a region that was supposedly friendly. The pResident should be very scared

[IndianaGreen]

19. It was Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt and Dan Senor

standing next to a bookish-looking civilian, Dan Senor, a key aide to Paul Bremer.

On edit:

Dan Senor rap sheet:



Dan Senor is a Senior Advisor to Presidential Envoy L. Paul Bremer III, Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority. Senor traveled to Baghdad in mid-April in one of the first civilian convoys to enter Iraq following the fall of the former regime. He has been serving in Iraq since, advising Amb. Bremer on a variety of policy and communications issues. During Operation Iraqi Freedom, Senor was based at Centcom Headquarters in Qatar, where he was Director of the Coalition Information Center. Senor has also served as a Legislative Aide, Press Secretary, and Communications Director for then-Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI). Senor completed his undergraduate studies at the University of Western Ontario and Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He earned his MBA from Harvard Business School.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/senor-bio.html

[wtmusic]

7. Say wha?

Who? What? Which General?

[gate of the sun]

8. tell that to the families.

these people are spitting on the lives given for their cabal.....how worse can it get.

[Renew Deal]

9. Please share?

What happened?

[1songbird]

11. You know what happened to the soldiers right?

[Renew Deal]

12. Yes...

[1songbird]

15. I understand the frustration that resulted in the original post

but why call out Gen. Clark as opposed to other candidates. The last time I checked there were 9 candidates running. I hate the smears that get sent Clark's way.

[wtmusic]

16. Puke Face? Figures. Phuck Face would never say something like that

;-)

[TahitiNut]

17. Locking

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
TahitiNut - DU moderator