Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specialist on International Law and the US Constitution is on CSpan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 09:12 AM
Original message
Specialist on International Law and the US Constitution is on CSpan
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 09:19 AM by La_Serpiente
www.cspan.com

for those interested in how international law impacts US law. They will explain treaties and Capital Punishment cases.

Also, Ruth Wedgwood is on right now. She is a Yale law professor that says that the military tribunals are constiutional and consistent with international law. She is also Wolfowitz's good friend.

How does international law impact US law? Well, in the recent Sodomy Case, legal statutes were used from the European Court of Human Rights for the ruling.

If you want to give her an earful, contact here here:

CALL-IN NUMBERS
Republican: (202) 585-3880
Democrat: (202) 585-3881
Others: (202) 585-3882
Fax: (202) 393-3346
Email: journal@c-span.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dang Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. international law
I'm not postitive but no where in the constitution is the supreme court directed to consult anything but the constitution for their direction in their rulings. That is their only guidence. I think that a justice that admits to looking at international law for guidence would step down without being asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I somewhat agree with you on that
However, we do have treaties that we must abide by. Also, there are the Geneva accords and other human rights conventions that we must abide by as well. I don't think the Supreme Court has to "legitmize" treaties that haven't been ratified by the Senate though.

Perhaps I should have clarified by other post. The Supreme Court in ruling the sodomy case didn't actually "legitimally cite" references from European human rights conventions. They only cited them as examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dang Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why consider
What is the Supreme Court doing considering anything out side the Constitution. And as for as treaties, that is OK until it runs counter to the explicit words of the Constitution. NATO, UN,...I Believe the Constitution expressly states that the armed forces of the U S are prohibited from control by any body other than the US. In my mind we are perfectly able to join any international organization we see fit, but the US can not allow our souldiers to be commanded by those oganizations. That was the problem in Somola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Laws and treaties can actually override the Constitution
Look at what the GATT does! Hell, GATT overrides your municipal ordinances.

The Supreme Court *should* overturn any laws or treaties that do conflict with the Constitution, but it's their responsibility to do so. It's not 'automatic'.

The offending law or treaty would remain in full force until formally overturned. But it would be up to the Supreme Court to actually do that.



(I can't BELIEVE you have the gall to bring up Somalia, BTW... :eyes: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Laws, treaties and the Contstitution are actually on the same level

Article VI:
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.


Different bodies have different responsibilities in regards to each. Laws are devised by the Legislative branch, and approved by the Executive branch. Treaties are sort of the other way around, devised by the Executive branch and approved by the Legislative brance.

The Constitution trumps both in terms of precedence, but that's more because the Courts are in charge of evaluating both of them, not due to any explicit prioritization in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. The US Consitution addresses International Treaties
and calls them "The surpeme law of the land". This is Article VI. paragraph 2 of the US consitution to wit:

"This consitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the Untied States shall be the supreme law of the land; and the jusges in every state shall be bound thereby, and thing in the consititions or the laws of any state to the contray notwithstanding"

Thus the Geneva Convention IS PART OF THE SURPEME LAW OF THE LAND and has to be addreses by the US Supreme Court.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Hi dang!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC