Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC caught doctoring Bush's words in new RNC add

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 08:57 AM
Original message
RNC caught doctoring Bush's words in new RNC add
ES MOINES, Nov. 24 — It may be called the Case of the Disappearing Pause.

When President Bush laid out the potential threat that unconventional weapons posed in Saddam Hussein's hands last year in his State of the Union address last year, he became tongue-tied at an inopportune moment.

The line read, "It would take one vial, one canister, one crate, slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known." But Mr. Bush stumbled between the words "one" and "vial." And when at the word vial, he pronounced the "v" as if it were a "w."

Yet in a new Republican commercial that borrows excerpts from that speech, Mr. Bush delivers that line as smoothly as any other in the address, without a pause between "one" and "vial," and the v in "vial" sounds strong and sure.

Republican officials acknowledged yesterday that the change was a product of technology. The line, they said, was digitally enhanced in editing "to ensure the best clarity."

The difference between the speech and excerpt was noticed by strategists for former Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont. They saw it as they put together their own advertisement attacking the spot, which presents the Democratic candidates as undermining the fight against terrorism. Word trickled back to Democratic officials, who retrieved the tape and confirmed that there was, indeed, a difference.

The Democrats asked whether the Republican National Committee had gone to the White House with sound equipment to have Mr. Bush recite the line anew for what was the first Republican commercial of the campaign season here. That might have meant that the party was not being truthful when it said it had not coordinated with Mr. Bush when it made the advertisement, a possible violation of law.



http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/25/politics/25ADS.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
curse10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why am I not surprised?
The RNC will stop at nothing-- and this is minor. What's funny is that they are acknowledging that Bush is a horrible speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. hmmmm, interesting n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Holy Crap
While certainly this is worth noting, the basic dishonesty inherent in the ad "Republicans want to fight terrorists and protect America; Democrats want to fight President Bush and leave America defenseless" is the bigger story, and that's where we should be focused. That, and the bit about how this ad reflects the old style thinking about Saddam and Osama.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. The whole audio was doctored
I noticed it the first time I heard it.

They've somehow manipulated his tone of voice and the rhythm of his speech in addition to cleaning up any stutterings.

He such a plastic fantastic pResident.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Haven't we seen this before?
This tickles a memory for me that we have noticed before that sometimes replays of Bush's* speeches don't seem as halting and garbled as they did when they were first given.

And I know for a fact that the radio addresses are spruced up before they are played for the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well if the law was violated then nothing will happen.
Welcome to new patriotic America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Rovian Method of Media Training
How long will it be until it isn't bush we see, but a digitally generated computer image ala Lara Croft?

I bet Rove has bush practice saying consonants and vowels in front of his mirror every morning for 30 minutes, just in case the boy king actually has to speak in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nothing wrong with that
Actually an interesting thought.
We'll have a holographic image of our president, and whoever gets elected to the White House gets to program its appearance and what it says.

Some 15 yr old will then hack the president and make him look like Elmor Fudd and make him say really stupid things.

Future....or present?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Indubitable speech coaching since 2000.
I noticcce lately he'sss essspecially proud of hisss S'sss, the ssssorry sssack of . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. No surprise here
I've seen the ad a few times and it really creeps me out. I finally figured out it was the music. There's something about it that makes the whole thing seem like some kind of bad dream, or like some science fiction horror fantasy. It's hard to explain but its creepy. Am I alone in feeling this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Of course
More lies from the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC