Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ipsos-Reid/Cook national poll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 04:50 PM
Original message
Ipsos-Reid/Cook national poll
Dean 20 (12)
Clark 16 (n/a)
Gephardt 14 (14)
Lieberman 12 (14)
Other 12 (23)
Kerry 10 (20)
Edwards 5 (6)
Kucinich 4 (n/a)
Sharpton 3 (3)
Braun 3 (3)

MoE +/- 4.4%. (July results in parenthesis).

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh04dem.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Some Moran Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lieberbush is still to high for comfort...
*shudders*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. It might come down to a Clark vs. Dean contest.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The media is still on that kick, Dean vs. Gep. This is..
good for Clark. It has been my experience that when the media tries to push a candidate voters usually will start to pay attention. when they start to pay attention they usually pick a candidate that is a sleeper to the media.

Go Clark! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. National polls mean jack
in primary season. only statewide polls make sense to look at. But it is interesting to see who rose and who fell.

Clark +16
Dean +8
Kucinich +4
Gephardt +0
Sharpton +0
Braun +0
Edwards -1
Lieberman -2
Kerry -10

So the real losers this summer/fall have been Kerry, Edwards, and Lieberman, and the real winners Clark, Dean, Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Does that mean anything else
as far as who voted for IWR:
Kerry, Edwards, Lieberman

and against or against the war:
Clark, Dean, Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pruner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. saying Clark is +16 is a little disingenuous
more than a little actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. well, partially
BUT as much as you may not like the dude, he has gone from 0% to 16%. He wasn't a candidate then, so I think it's pretty amazing from him going from a draft movement to 16% without hardly stumping for long. Even during the draft movement, I doubt his support would have topped 16%. All that aside, I think he's won supporters in the past few months, not lost them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. concur
+/- doesn't make sense when you have nothing to compare it to (for this particular poll)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. ok then
Look better everyone?

Dean +8
Kucinich +4
Gephardt +0
Sharpton +0
Braun +0
Edwards -1
Lieberman -2
Kerry -10

Clark n/a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Get real
Clark +16%??? LOL!

That's only because the last Ipsos-Reid poll was taken BEFORE Clark entered the race and therefore he wasn't even an option.

If you want a true measure of trends, one can look at the Fox/Opinion Dynamics Poll that offers three polls since Clark got in the race. Here's what that looks like, oldest to newest (9/24, 10/15, 11/19):

Dean: 13, 12, 18 (+5)
Clark: 20, 13, 14 (-6)
Lieberman: 9, 11, 10 (-1)
Gephardt: 9, 9, 9 (0)
Kerry: 10, 10, 8 (-2)
Braun: 2, 3, 3 (+1)
Edwards: 5, 3, 3 (-2)
Kucinich: 1, 2, 2 (+1)
Sharpton: 2, 2, 2 (0)
Not sure: 21, 35, 25 (+4)

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh04dem.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I stand corrected
and that's fine with me since I really ain't too cool with Clark after I read his speech to the School of the Americas.

And my first point is the one that is most important - national polls mean jack in primary season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The Meaning of Polls at This Stage
I don't know if I'd go so far as to say they don't mean jack. But I think I understand what you are saying -- that they are no indication of who will utlimately win. What they are good for is showing trends -- whose campaign is being effective, whose isn't.

They are like getting basketball scores every few minutes. If over the course of a few reports one sees a team's lead increase from 2 points, to 6 points, to 12 points, one can devine that that team is playing well. But just like in basketball, deficts can be overcome and it's not over until the final buzzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmaier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Pick a Poll

Okay, let's play pick a poll and spot the trend. I'd say Gallup is pretty good source from their Nov 14-16 poll of 1,004 with an MOE +-3. The earliest poll number is from Oct 6-8.

Dean: 17,l7,16,13,16 (+1)
Clark: 17,14,15,18,21 (-4)
Lieberman:13,15,12,13,13 (0)
Gephardt: 13,12,12,10,8 (+5)
Kerry: 9,10,10,11,13 (-4)
Braun: 4,4,4,5,4 (0)
Edwards: 6,7,6,6,2 (+4)
Kucinich: 3,3,1,3,2 (+1)
Sharpton: 5,3,6,6,6 (-1)
Not sure: 13,15,18,15,15 (-2)


Who knows what this means. Though with Dean's funds, organization and media coverage, I wonder where his bounce is nationally? In fact, national polls taken immediately prior to the Iowa caucuses have been a pretty good indication of nomination outcome.


Wes Clark '04 -- All patriot. No Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Funny you should pick a poll that says what you want to hear...
..sad that the poll you chose was the FOX poll. Is everything they say now gospel?

Why didn't you use the CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll? Because Clark looks too good in it.

Howard Dean 17 17 16 13 16
Wesley Clark 17 14 15 18 21

Oh. look! They're tied!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting Clark Observation
Although the issue seems to have come and gone, this poll casts doubt on the notion that Clark is a stalking horse for Hillary Clinton.

When asked who they would support if Hillary enters the race, every candidate loses about half of their supporters to Clinton, except Clark. Only about a quarter of the Clark supporters would bolt if Hillary entered the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-03 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Look, Clark is fading!
Oh, wait, he's within the MOE of 1st?

Glad to see that L-man is down 2, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC