Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich out in front on issues again - pro decriminalization of pot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:00 PM
Original message
Kucinich out in front on issues again - pro decriminalization of pot
Decriminalization of Marijuana
http://www.kucinich.us/issues/marijuana_decrim.php

The example of Prohibition illustrates the importance of distinguishing between drug use and drug abuse. Alcohol is a powerful depressant, the use of which leads to impaired judgment and motor skills. Taken in sufficient quantity, alcohol consumption can result in organ damage or death. Despite these very real dangers, however, most Americans are able to use alcohol safely their entire adult lives. Further, this use typically occurs without significant impact on careers, families, and communities. Armed with a clear understanding of both the benefits and potential risks of alcohol use, people overwhelmingly choose the path of responsibility and moderation.

Unfortunately, current drug policy fails to take into account the lessons of Prohibition. The law regards all users as abusers, and the result has been the creation of an unnecessary class of lawbreakers.

Non-violent marijuana users comprise the bulk of the half-million Americans imprisoned for drug violations, and many frequently serve longer sentences than do those convicted of violent crimes. In addition to the staggering cost of housing these prisoners, the "war on drugs" tears families apart, weakens the American workforce, and drains law enforcement of resources.

The rationale for continuing these draconian policies is unclear. Statistical evidence shows that marijuana use follows a pattern very similar to that of alcohol. Most marijuana users do so responsibly, in a safe, recreational context. These people lead normal, productive lives - pursuing careers, raising families and participating in civic life. In addition, marijuana has proven benefits in the treatment of numerous diseases, such as providing a valuable means of pain management for terminally ill patients. In either of these contexts, there is no rational justification for criminally enforced prohibitions. These unnecessary arrests and incarcerations serve only to crowd prisons, clog the judicial system, and distract law enforcement officials from violent crime.

Racial bias in the enforcement of drug laws is pervasive. According to a Human Rights Watch report based on FBI statistics, blacks were arrested on drug charges at nearly five times the rate of whites. Drug use is consistent across racial and socioeconomic lines -- yet in the state of New York, for example, 94 percent of incarcerated drug offenders are Latino or African-American, mostly from poor communities.

The voters have spoken on this issue, over and over, in many states, choosing to legalize the medical use of marijuana. In Washington, D.C., the Congress refused to allow D.C. to even count the votes, violating both common sense (on the marijuana decriminalization question) and civil and voting rights (by denying D.C. residents their own voice).

A Kucinich administration would reject the current paradigm of "all use is abuse" in favor of a drug policy that sets reasonable boundaries for marijuana use by establishing guidelines similar to those already in place for alcohol. America can no longer afford to ignore the lessons of Prohibition. By joining with our friends in Canada and European countries in moving away from criminally-enforced drug prohibitions, we will be moving towards safer streets and stronger communities.


are there any other candidates with this position?

:dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! And in answer to your question no
What other candidate has the balls to upset the alcohol industry and the old foagies who think that marijuana use inevitably leads to a heroin over-dose.

:smoke:

One more reason :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. DK again taking the most progressive position?
WTG DK! :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. This really is progressive for all the people whose lives
are ruined simply over this ridiculous issue. And also for all those in pain... This is great.

Peace :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impeach the gop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. He's the only one, I'm hear to tell ya
The man speaks to the special interest of people. The rest are still corporate whores. And we know it. Therefore, VOTE FOR DENNIS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PissedOffPollyana Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Hey! Didn't you see Reefer Madness!
It's BAD I tell you.... BAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RowWellandLive Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. It's easy to have balls
when you're the longest of longshots with nothing to lose. I agree with his position but give him no kudos for "balls." Obviously the so-called "base" agrees with him so it's not much of a risk at all. Sadly, most of America is not with us on this yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. More people would be with us
if the other candidates didn't say idiotic, dishonest things like "medical marijuana issue needs more study." Gutless wonders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Nonsense
http://www.mpp.org/statelaw/app_d.html

It's overwhelmingly favored, just like universal health care and opposition to sending more jobs abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm betting no
Go Kooch!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. DK suprises me
every damn day with something new that makes me go

"HOLY CRAP!" we need this guy. Who's showing real leadership? Who really wants to take the country back?

:dem: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lots of smart reasons for the Democrats to take the lead,.
(1) Stop the drain into the underground economy....a new legit stream of tax revenue. Maybe $20BB back into our economy.
(2) Stop criminalizing people over an essentially harmless substance
(3) Take away the big profits from criminals
(4) Save a ton of money we spend wasting precious police resources and focus on real criminals.
(5) Stop funding more prisons for non-violent pot smokers.

This is a natural Democratic constituency. If we really want to take back the government, we could add 5MM motivated people to vote Democrat.

And if we don't, the Republicans will...and take those votes along with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yes
...and all they'd have to do is tell the truth. But that, obviously, is too much to ask of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PissedOffPollyana Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nobody else, that I can see.
Edited on Wed Nov-26-03 06:31 PM by PHDiva
Dean: Not mentioned
Braun: Not mentioned
Gephardt: Not mentioned
Sharpton: Not mentioned
Kerry: All over the "war on drugs"
Edwards: More all over the "war on drugs"
Lieberman: Does anyone even need to check to surmise where "smokin' Joe" stands on the issue? **laughing**
(oops) Clark: No mention either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimchi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Watch a leader in action.
DK is a true progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. A true progressive and
a true leader. He is blazing trails for progressives to follow. Whether or not he gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ficus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. kick
:kick: kickin it Dennis style
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. Good call, Dennis
I am fully with him on this issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC