NYT article on Iraq control shift reveals view plan tied to Oct., '04

[DeepModem Mom]

The American plan to turn over power in Iraq more quickly was thrown into disarray on Wednesday when the country's most powerful cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, made public his opposition to a proposal for indirect elections.


Spokesmen for Ayatollah Sistani, who exercises strong influence over Iraq's majority Shiites, said he insisted that the election, planned for June, be a direct ballot and not the caucus-style vote called for in the American plan. He also insists that the new Iraqi government have a more overtly Islamic character.


The view that the United States elections play a major role in shaping Iraq's political future is widely held among (Iraqi Governing) council members.

Ahmad Chalabi, another council member, said: "The whole thing was set up so President Bush could come to the airport in October for a ceremony to congratulate the new Iraqi government. When you work backwards from that, you understand the dates the Americans were insisting on." American officials deny that electoral concerns played a role in their planning.


http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/27/international/middleeast/27IRAQ.html?pagewanted=all&position=

[The Backlash Cometh]

1. That is pretty sad when the enemy allies understand your motivations

better than your own countrymen.

[maddezmom]

2. any play in the US media?

I don't know if this is getting any play in the states due to the holiday, but on CNN International and BBC it did earlier this am. This council could be a nightmare for Bush*.

[DeepModem Mom]

3. From this morning's NYT....

Interesting in light of today's surprise visit to Iraq.