Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Political Castes of the American Republic (a student paper, c. 2500)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-03 03:03 PM
Original message
The Political Castes of the American Republic (a student paper, c. 2500)


the following is an excerpt from a high school senior's term paper in World History from 2500.

The American Republic had several castes, the members of which were allowed various levels of citizenship. First, the value of a citizen's vote depending on which 'state' that citizen lived. For example, in the United States Senate, the highest congress of the land, citizens of the Wyoming state enjoyed nearly 100 times the representative power as did citizens of the California state (Wyoming had a senator for every 200,000 citizens while California had one senator for every 18 million citizens). Furthermore, the city-state of 'Distric of Colombia,' even though they hosted the federal government and was peopled by 700,000 people, did not enjoy Senatorial representation.

This disparity continued into the Republic's presidential election system. The system known as the 'electoral college' gave preference to states like Wyoming, who were awarded one elector for every 130,000 citizens while California only had one elector for every 650,000 citizens.

Even in the most democratic of the houses of Congress, this discrimination continued. In the House of Representatives, Wyoming had a representative for 450,000 citizens while California only had one representative for 640,000 of its people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-03 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow!
Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-03 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i just wrote it up right now... I have been thinking about it...
for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-03 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. This coudl be a serious problem in the century ahead... civil war?
Think about it... if the population disparity gets higher and higher, you could have movements in larger states calling for the forced "merger" of smaller, unpopulated states. I think the East Coast states (Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire), because of the influence of their high population neighbors, would agree to a federal 're-districting' program. Where as the Western and Plains states would resist tooth and claw. Texas would use that provision they were given when they joined the Union that gives them the power to break up into 6 smaller states, the boundaries of these states being decided by a conservative conspiracy, much to the chagrin and discontent of the East and West Coast.

Civil War, baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-03 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. If BFEE Style Control Continues Much Longer, Revolution Is Inevitable
Edited on Sun Nov-30-03 03:22 PM by mhr
People will not put up with the

Hypocrisy,
Wealth Disparity,
Permanent Unemployment,
Crumbling Schools, and
Wealthy Only Healthcare Forever.

The dam will brake eventually and Republican heads will roll.

History demands no less.

Yet the corporations and Republicans seem to have never read history and are unwilling to share the wealth and power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-03 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think at the time of the constitutional convention...
the population disparity between the largest state (VA) and the smallest state (RI?) was like 15, now it is like 80 between Wyoming and California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-03 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. i think the problem is that we capped the number of reps.
instead of letting it grow with population. i think we should repeal that provison. granted, this would make it necessary to revamp some parliamentary procedures, but i think it would make things more equitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC