Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deleted message

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:38 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. wouldn't he....
....have some sort of security clearance in his military position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I sure would think so
I'm undecided and there is something about him besides his policies that really appeals to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. ...but think of White & Enron.
Any military guy needs to be checked out for corporate (esp. defense industry) connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. There were discussions here last ( or at BC)...and some were wondering.
I can not remember what they were about. I can't find them. I am surprised at the eagerness people feel, and he has not even declared.

Do I like him? I think so. I sure wish I could find those really thoughtful discussions from here from last year. It concerned me, and I can't remember why. Something to do with Kosovo? Not sure. Could have been at Bartcop.

He comes across well, and seems to have all the right stuff. I just want to reread the discussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Maybe this?
"I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the international K-For peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital.

You want a guy w/a hair trigger temper be the one to have his finger on the red button?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes, I think that was it.
But there was a whole web page, which could have been skewed against him, I don't know. We are skewed here in some ways. I remember the webpage concerned me, but was not anything you could say for sure.

I think all candidates need to be thoroughly checked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. There are a lot
of links out there. Just google clark + kosovo. Most are not flattering, unless you like someone who's best achievement is killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rove would "drop a bomb" on Mother Teresa
Your concern is not unwarranted, but has Howard Dean been "vetted?" John Kerry? Any of the candidates may have secrets, and if they don't the Republicans will make something up. What we know about Clark is that he served for decades under the military's code for personal behavior without hint of scandal, and did so in an environment in which he had enemies who would have loved to "drop a bomb." We also know that he has experienced Democratic campaign advisors working with him behind the scenes, so they're presumably going over his history. These aren't guarantees, but they're really the best we can do with any candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clark is in better shape than the other 9 Candidates
However, no candidate can truely be "vetted" just look at Clinton in '92.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good question and I would certainly hope so.
No Surprises needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think so.
People who reach high office have all made some mistakes and some enemies along the way. I've read Clark's impressive bio but have never seen anything resembling a Rovian dissection of him.

Whose job is it to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. I expect he is the best vetted since forever ... a long, long time ...
he had clearances up the wazoo ... and they take a hard look at some of those clearances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ilpostino Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Possible chink
I saw Russert interview him and ask why he was relieved of his duty when he was so close to his retirement date, and he gave a very vague and unconvincing answer about how these things happen sometimes in the military. Obviously there was nothing out there, because Russert let it go at that, but it sure was the weakest I've ever seen him....and might be the reason he's been hanging back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't worry, if they can't find something to smear him with,
They'll just make something up.
See Clinton/Whitewater, Gore/Liar, etc.
The Late J.C. could come down from on high and run as a Democrat and Rove et. al. would smear him with something. Maybe his felony conviction, maybe his relationship with Mary M., something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SavageWombat Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Isn't it obvious?
JC himself is known to associate with drunks and prostitutes - and his father says JC's not really HIS son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Not to mention that TAX COLLECTOR!
and the socialistic stuff he keeps on saying about helping your neighbor...AND he says nice things about those dirty Samaritans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. SINCE his clearance...
Edited on Fri Jul-25-03 11:25 PM by JasonBerry
I know the Clark supporters are tired of hearing from some of us, but the man is known as an arrogant, pompous, hothead - which in the military REALLY tells you something.

- Pristina Airport
- Cluster Bombs
- Landmines
- Blowing trains filled with civilians off bridges
- Relieved of duty EARLY and says when asked why, "I didn't ask." Right.

The list is long.....Being vetted for a security clearance and being vetted by the voters is two different things. Rumsfeld was "vetted", so was Ashcroft, and going back a long way - Haldeman, Ehrlichman, GENERAL LeMay, on and on and on.....vetting for security has nothing to do with legitimate campaign issues.

Get in General Clark! We'll talk about MORE than the above.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally343434 Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-03 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. What's with all this Clark idolatry?
First, this ain't the Eisenhower era. Clark has no elective political background. He has the same chance to go anywhere (none) as any other person who has run for President these days with similar (lack of) political credentials, such as Al Haig, Ross Perot, Steve Forbes, Ralph Nader, etc. Let them hold some lower political office first. That's the way it works. You just don't get elected President as your first political campaign.

Besides, who wants a "khaki election?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-26-03 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I don't get it either
Most of the people here know absolutely nothing about him, except that he wore a uniform with a handful of stars on it. And perhaps that he's nice looking, and talks nice (if you ignore what he's saying -- or not saying, as the case may be).

I might be okay with him for Veep, but I for darned sure am not comfortable jumping all up and down over this guy without any real knowledge of him. Yeah, he's pro-Choice, and a few other very basic things. But that's ALL people know.

It's not just silly, it's embarrassing.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC