TrueAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 04:38 AM
Original message |
Is this a winning ticket? |
Marines for Clark
(68 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 05:15 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Now who could beat that team |
izzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 05:39 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I would not put a black women on the ticket |
|
Like it or not their are still people who will not vote for a women or a black.I like this team but I lived in the South and even in North this is not the year to go with this.. Do not send me e-mail I am just telling you what I think. White men are still running this country and this is not the time to do this or it is how I real.I also see this as a joke but I say this even if you wished to run Sen Clinton as the women,a female running now will just be another wall to jump.
|
Bombtrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. just curious but what candidate do you support? |
|
I personally think Clark would be wise to pick Edwards and vice versa
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 06:35 AM
Response to Original message |
|
But would she take the #2 spot?
|
PSR40004
(144 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
OK since when would it right for us to run popular people instead of "good" people. If I want oprah I'll watch TV, when I want a politician I'd perfer someone with experance a heart beat away from the President.
Besides that Clark isn't winnable IMO... Go Dean.
|
TrueAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
He can't win. The far left may vote for him. But he loses on national security. Only Clark can win.
|
Don_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. And You're Nostradamus or God? |
ithacan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
the username itself gives that away
|
TrueAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
I refuse to stoop to your level.
|
Bombtrack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. it's amazing to believe that so many people could be so deluded |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 07:38 AM by Bombtrack
Clark, a four star general and successful diplomat, at time when US foriegn policy is more important than it's probably been since the Cuban missle crisis, who has an impeccable educational and career biography is less winnable than an angry, born rich and blue-blood, middle class tax raising, governor of 600 thousand.
It's one thing to support him on the issues, it's quite another to so obsessed and on another plane of existenc that you disregard all political reality and law.
Dean is there Dream candidate, period
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:39 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Oprah is on my shitlist. She was instrumental in helping Ahhhhhnold get elected in California. Nope. No Oprah.
|
CWebster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 07:56 AM
Response to Original message |
12. If you are appealling to Barbie and GI joe dolls |
Marines for Clark
(68 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Clark/Edwards ticket is a dream team |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Oprah, the Arnold whore? |
ILeft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
15. ...and this would make a great campaign picture: |
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-04-03 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Oprah is not a politician. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |