Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark's democratic spirit - Why I like the Man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 07:57 AM
Original message
Clark's democratic spirit - Why I like the Man
Apologies if this is a dupe post.

Clark's closing statement last night in Exeter NH was really inspiring (IMO both for Clark supporters and others).

Clark explained that he was running as a call to service, that he didn't plan for this, didn't approach his life or career choices for this - but that people drafted him and really demanded that he serve his country -- I liked that - it is true and for me is the answer to folks who keep saying he shouldn't win because he is not a politican (not being a politican is one of his high points IMO).

Anyway, he summed up his remarks by saying (I think this is virtually word for word) these amazing words --

"we have a president that will run for office next year using national security, patriotism and the american flag to crush the Democratic party and the democratic spirit - and I am running because we cannot let that happen"

These words speak to all of us - I like his focus on Big D democrats and on the little d democratic spirit. Wesley says country before party - he is here because he believes in our democracy and wants to fight for it.

I encourage all of you to think both about your candidate and about our democracy - we can't let Bush crush us us our party spirit or our spirit for our great country. We are fighting against them, and not against each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes! Clark Is About Public Service & Unity
He has the potential to win DECISIVELY with a MANDATE for change which no other Democrat running can do.

Some of the other Dems may squeak in- but Diebold makes this a losing proposition...

Clark says right out "I'm not running to BASH Bush I'm running to REPLACE him".

That is what Democrats, Independants and moderate Republicans will vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, his "country above party " spirit inspires me with some hope
for our future.

Thanks,

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here is a more exact quote:
For me this is a call to service...

The clinching argument was delivered by my son who is a 33 year old screenwriter in Hollywood. When my wife was a little bit concerned and said she didn't really want to - didn't think we needed to do this - thought we'd done enough.

And my son said - he said, "Mom." He said, "You can't say that." He said, "This family has always stood for public service. That's why you moved me from school to school and house to house." And he said, "You just have to think and ask yourself this question. How safe will your new grandchild be if Dad isn't President?"

So for me it's a very personal mission. I'm in this for public service. It's not something I worked for all my life. It's not something planned or plotted for. It's not that because this is the best opportunity or the last opportunity or anything of the sort. I'm here because I think America is in trouble. And I think that we are going to be running in 2004 in an election in which a President is going to unscrupulously use national security, patriotism, and the American flag to try to crush the Democratic Party. And he's going to try to crush the democratic spirit in America. I'm running because that must not happen to our country. And I need your support. Thank you.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks
of course it sounds much more compelling than my cobbled version.

Call me goofy, but I literally started clapping for the man in my liviing room when he said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StuckinBuffalo Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thank You for that
Clark should be the Democratic candidate IMO since it looks more and more like Gore will not throw his hat in the ring. {{{sniff}}} {{{sniff}}}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. I love Gore too. And I see Clark as the champion for Gore..
who will crush the bushistas and expose their crimes against America. When Clark is finished with the bushies, Gore will be vindicated and that * will remain next to smirky's name, evermore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not being a career politician,
is definitely a plus for Clark...in my book. Clark WILL NOT lose to the shrub if he wins the nomination. He's a shoe-in and the administration KNOWS it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. "democratic spirit", eh?
Sort of like our adventures in bringing "democracy" to Latin America, by training natives in the School of the Americas to slaughter their own--or through organizations like the NED, the National Endowment for Democracy deliberately instituted to carry on the CIA's covert activities to undermine foreign countries and have them conform to the American interpretation of "making the world safe for democracy" to protect US corporate interests.

Yeah, I'll betcha ol' Wesley understands that version of Democracy when it comes to "success" in Iraq to compensate for the perceived loss of honor in Viet Nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You Just Couldn't Stay Away Huh?
Funny, too funny.

I respect your right to say what you want. You are however, wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why should I have to "stay away"?
This doesn't have to do with supporting any candidate, it has to do with the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ahh, Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. You had a chance to talk to him.
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 08:38 AM by Bleachers7
Why didn't you ask him about this stuff? Are you scared of the answers or that you might like him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I guess you plan to drop depleted uranium or plant land-mines
to keep CW away. I know those are acceptable behaviors for many Clark supporters. Some of you would "yawn" if you saw a child's leg blown off by an abandoned mine left by the General.

Oh that's right--last week one of the Clark brain-trust members informed another DUer that it was more that DUers fault as a citizen then it was Clark's. After all he was "just doing his job."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Now What Is Dean's Position On DU?
Waiting waiting waiting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I support Kucinich
But Clarkies complaining about Dean is the most amusing thing at DU anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. What's Kucinich's Stance On DU?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 09:41 AM by cryingshame
Oh, that's right. Dennis has no chance of winning so he can commit political suicide by coming out against it during the Primaries...

Yeah, there's nothing like a bunch of screaming leftwing radicals harping on a subject that contains the work Uranium... although they leave off the Depleted part....

Like Caldicott who talks about aerosolized DU when, if fact, that isn't what happens on the battlefield.

The only benefit that comes from discussing DU as an issue right now, on the NATIONAL stage, is the Green Party and the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. When he spoke at SOA he was just doing his job like Eichman did his
"The Banality of Evil" by Arendt is a book I think of more and more in regards to Clark.

Last week I asked a Clark supporter if they could give me a list of progressive things Clark had DONE in his life--not said--but a record of action. She replied that he was a "General who was progressive in the way he waged war."

"War us Peace" is a phrase I expected from a Bushie but never thought that would be a defense used here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Eichmann, eh?
Any other deep comparisons to offer to us, the Benighted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Wow your retort has an anti-intellectual edge that is hardly surprising
I do think that Clark's speaking at SOA and the Republican Fundraiser were equivalents to the "banality of evil." But you will twist that and skip those points. I did not say he was EXACTLY like Eichmann but you may not understand that it is possible to compare parts of two wholes. (And yes the pun was intended.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. How is it like the banality of evil
Applying that phrase to speaking to the SOA doesn't make sense at all.

The banality of evil refers to evil being performed, without the urging of a hateful heart, or with the passion of evil men. When Arendt applied it to Eichmann, it referred to the performance of evil as merely another bureaucratic task, divorced from the underlying suffering--neither wanting it or distasting it, merely going along with it so that one could receive a paycheck, climb a social rung, whatever.

One of the highlights of Eichmann in Jerusalem was how normal Eichmann appeared. He wasn't particulary bloodthirsty or hateful. He was an ordinary German performing evil in an extraordinary time.

How the hell does that apply to Clark? (I'll give you a few minutes as you cobble together some nonsense logical mumbo jumbo.)

Maybe you're confusing "just following orders" to the "banality of evil". Maybe you're slinging rhetorical feces, hoping something will stick.

Now, issues in this moral domain are, granted, difficult to speak clearly about. But if you can't do it, just don't try. Find less pretentious ways to bash Clark.

You know, whereof one cannot speak...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. I hear crickets chirping...
I guess someone has'nt come up with a witty retort yet...no surprise there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. "an anti-intellectual edge that is hardly surprising"
I'm going to remember that phrase for weeks. Anyway, continue try to maximize the ratio

pretense
--------
substance

It's rising towards infinity rapidly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Howard Dean Gets Backing From Union Involved In Venezuelan Coup
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 08:38 AM by cryingshame
Since recieving support for the two biggest Unions in the AFL-CIO, Dean will be beholden to them and their agenda which includes trying to oust Chavez in Venezuela.

The AFL-CIO has given money to critics of Chavez and those trying to depose him.

Dean & Union leaders doesn't care about workers...

Why do you think Dean won't stand up against anti-Union "Right To Work" Laws?

Dean is in league with the NeoCon agenda. That is why he won't cut Pentagon funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. not quite
The Endowment has four principal initial recipients of funds: the International Republican Institute; the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs; an affiliate of the AFL-CIO (such as the American Center for International Labor Solidarity); and an affiliate of the Chamber of Commerce (such as the Center for International Private Enterprise). These institutions then disburse funds to other institutions in the US and all over the world, which then often disburse funds to yet other organizations.
In a multitude of ways, NED meddles in the internal affairs of foreign countries by supplying funds, technical know-how, training, educational materials, computers, fax machines, copiers, automobiles and so on, to selected political groups, civic organizations, labor unions, dissident movements, student groups, book publishers, newspapers, other media, etc. NED programs generally impart the basic philosophy that working people and other citizens are best served under a system of free enterprise, class cooperation, collective bargaining, minimal government intervention in the economy and opposition to socialism in any shape or form. A freemarket economy is equated with democracy, reform and growth, and the merits of foreign investment are emphasized.
From 1994 to 1996, NED awarded 15 grants, totaling more than $2,500,000, to the American Institute for Free Labor Development, an organization used by the CIA for decades to subvert progressive labor unions. AlFLD's work within Third World unions typically involved a considerable educational effort very similar to the basic NED philosophy described above. The description of one of the 1996 NED grants to AIFLD includes as one its objectives: "build union-management cooperation". Like many things that NED says, this sounds innocuous, if not positive, but these in fact are ideological code words meaning "keep the labor agitation down...don't rock the status quo boat". The relationship between NED and AIFLD very well captures the CIA origins of NED.
The Endowment has funded centrist and rightist labor organizations to help them oppose those unions which were too militantly proworker. This has taken place in France, Portugal and Spain amongst many other places. In France, during the 1983-4 period, NED supported a "trade union-like organization for professors and students" to counter "left-wing organizations of professors". To this end it funded a series of seminars and the publication of posters, books and pamphlets such as "Subversion and the Theology of Revolution" and "Neutralism or Liberty". ("Neutralism" here refers to being unaligned in the Cold War.)

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/TrojanHorse_RS.html

Note this especially:

The description of one of the 1996 NED grants to AIFLD includes as one its objectives: "build union-management cooperation". Like many things that NED says, this sounds innocuous, if not positive, but these in fact are ideological code words meaning "keep the labor agitation down...don't rock the status quo boat". The relationship between NED and AIFLD very well captures the CIA origins of NED.

Now recall Clark's views on labor, economy and regulation where he advocates building union-management cooperation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Clark and "democratic" in the same sentence
Edited on Thu Dec-04-03 08:50 AM by ozone_man
seems to invite a talk about NED doesn't it? My mind was think the same thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. You forgot that he called the GOP unscrupulous in his closing remarks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. familydoctor, don't you know that Clark is a Nazi?
Read a few posts above for comprehensive arguments by the fairest people on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. So now you are clearly telling a lie. I never said he was a Nazi
Just that I consider some of his actions to be evil--and that the defense that he "was just doing his job" is one that was used by Nazis. But you have a history here of obfuscating and invention when responding to others posts. And when you ask for a link--just read above as you yourself proposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I apologize
You did not call Clark a Nazi. You merely compared him to Adolph Eichmann, murderer of millions, enemy of humanity.

I will take greater care to draw my distinctions more finely, just as you take such great care when crafting analogies with monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marines for Clark Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. Clark is the man!!!!!!
Clark is wonderful !!!!!!1 I love to see these jealous folks who are supporting a draft dodger with no guts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. All along,
I thought our MAIN objective was to get the shrub out of President Al Gore's White House? Clark is the man who can do it....no doubt in my mind. There's no way in hell the shrub can win against Clark. I like placing my bets on a "for sure" 2004 win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. i like Clark too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
33. General Clark has answered our call
and that, to me, is inspiring. Don't care what anyone else thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC