Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Al Gore's Endorsement Premature? - the non-push-poll edition!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:10 PM
Original message
Poll question: Was Al Gore's Endorsement Premature? - the non-push-poll edition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I vote NO. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. considering that not a single vote had been cast in the primaries
Edited on Mon Dec-08-03 08:13 PM by moz4prez
I vote yes.

it's no less a major boost for Dean.

edit: guffaw! what's with me skipping over words like that. "Dean and Clark in STATISTICAL DEAD according to latest Pew Poll!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. What's the sense in endorsing if it isn't going to influence votes?
He is endorsing so that he can sway votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Depends on who you support...
If you're for Dean then the answer is no else it is yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah
Now when he endorses the winner, if it's not Dean, it won't have the same punch. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. it wouldn't have been a punch...
because as a Democrat, it is expected that Al Gore would endorse the winner. This was not expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. yeah I see your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Hello....Wake up folks....
Edited on Mon Dec-08-03 08:25 PM by liberalnurse
Dean will be the winner......

Gore's endorsement is a political orgasm!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I vote no.
It's just a bunch of crybabies voting yes. Honestly, they would find no issue if Gore said "I'm for Clark" or "I'm for Kerry" or, Hell, "I'm for Moseley Braun."

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I disagree
If he came out for my choice I'd still have a problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Sorry, but I doubt it.
Honestly.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only Because He Didn't Support "MY" Candidate!!!
:D

oh, i forgot....

Gore who??????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wrong question
The question should be, should Al Gore have endorsed ANYONE?

I don't think he should have. He should have done a Hillary and said that he'd support whichever of the nine Democrats gets the nomination, because each one of them is a million times better than Junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. In a way, that is the question
Premature = pre-primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Early
I think Gore should've let things play out awhile. BTW, I like Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Absolutely
If indeed it does happen. (I've been out at a meeting this evening so I'm not sure if it's a done deal yet.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh c'mon
Sour grapes must be the only reason anyone would complain. How sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. i went with undecided
i dont think it's easy to say. On one hand, i think it obviously helps Dean (duh). He'll get a lot of money, it'll help make him 'safe' for party insiders to endorse, and it'll draw in the undecided voters who havent been paying attention (add the lieberman guys to that group in the polls... imo a lot of lieberman voters aren't really lieberman supporters, they're leftovers from 4 years ago)

But if that help takes Leibpharry out of the race earlier (rather than seeing them stick longer due to the primary dates) then it will likely gell the anti-dean vote into one candidate.

By putting Dean in front, it will likely make him the target of the attacks by all but Clark (it seems Clark is betting he's going to be the alternative candidate and taking the high road, for now) - so the likelyhood of sniping between camps makes it less and less likely of easily converting those voters as their candidates drop. If they drop earlier, and have a lowered opinion of dean, it could hurt him.

I still think it nets positive, but i'm not sure it wouldnt have been more effective if it happened a couple weeks from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. The ONLY ? is: Did Gore contribute to defeating Bush with this? ONLY ?.
Answer: Hell yeah!! and that's why it happened.

Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Now THAT's an excellent point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. He endorsed when it actually means something
Rather than AFTER the front runner emerges. Finally some democrats with spines who are willing to take positions before they run a poll to make sure it's popular.

Good for Gore... and Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is like the british Conservative leader elections
in some ways, there is something going on here that we were not privey to.

I'll take a shot.

The Democratic party decided they needed the maximum amount of time to campaign against bush* as possible.

The primary season was started very early and who was in the lead in october was going to be declared the winner by Gore. Then Clark joined the election a bit late, but made an early impression, so they put back the winning time a couple of months.

So now what happens is all the candidates pull out and Dean is declared the winner and it's chocs away for going at bush* for nearly an entire year.

Possibly but don't bet on it. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Timing was Just Perfect
Gore has a vested interest in our future.

Like me, he wants to see the BEST Democrat win in the primaries.

That means the candidate who is the most progressive, forward thinking, creative and just damn smart.

Gore wants the best for America.

THAT is why he endorsed Dean, why it was the right thing to do and why the timing was right: he forecloses the impact of a Clinton endorsement of Clark and dfraws a line in the sand against the DLC.

RIGHT ON AL! Thank You!!!

and God Bless.

Al Gore for UN Ambassador!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pegleg Thd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I can't keep but thinking
that if Dean gets the nomination we will see Al Gore as his choice for the 2nd seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC