Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Opposes Taiwan Bid for Independence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:40 PM
Original message
Bush Opposes Taiwan Bid for Independence
WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) said Tuesday after meeting with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao that he opposes the apparent interest of Taiwan's leaders in taking steps toward independence.

We oppose any unilateral decision by either China or Taiwan to change the status quo," Bush said, "and the comments and actions made by the leader of Taiwan indicate that he may be willing to make decisions unilaterally, to change the status quo, which we oppose."


It was the administration's strongest statement to date in opposition to Taiwan's plan to conduct a referendum on March 20 on whether the Taiwanese people want to demand that China withdraw hundreds of missiles aimed at Taiwan and renounce the use of force against the island.

"The Chinese government respects the desire of people in Taiwan for democracy, but we must point out that the (Taiwanese leaders) are only using democracy as an excuse and attempt to resort to defensive referendums to split Taiwan away from China," he said. "Such separatist activities are what the Chinese side can absolutely not accept."

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=516&u=/ap/20031209/ap_on_re_as/us_china_031209191025&printer=1


What the crap? Bush again comes out and says he opposes Democracy! Screw him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Poppy must've gotten to him...
Before the Neo-Cons did...and he's ticked Jesse Helms off by this statement, too, I'll bet! Better watch it, Dub...both the Neo-Cons and Ultra-Fundies mad at you at the same time...not a good thing heading into 2004!:eyes:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wegottem Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the problem is
He has not been the liberator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Didn't the Chinese embarrass Thatcher
Didn't they embarrass her years ago on Hong Kong, basically telling her to 'talk to the hand' regarding Hong Kong becoming part of China that left her so shaken that she stumbled out of the room? Maybe somebody in the Bush admin is trying to avoid the same situation over Taiwan in the near future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Chill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush sells out to abortion forcing, Anti-theist, Anti-freedom State.
Where are those faith based values now????!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is just a restatement of policy
Our stance has been "One China" forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not really, we've got both Two-China and One-China policies
We've always had an unofficial two-China policy. We never talked about it, but we always regarded privatly that Taiwan was independant of China. Bush is making a big mistake with a open one=China policy, but oh well, the world is doomed anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. wasn't there a gaffe
early on in his administration where he stated something like that 'America will stand by its two China policy' (paraphrased). I seem to remember my jaw hitting the floor over over that one. I guess his handlers have since corrected him.

Anyone else remember it? Was I dreaming that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What he said was that we would use military force to defend Taiwan
...Which many thought would lead to Taiwan feeling confident enough to declare independence.

But that was then, apparently...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yes, it was the same
It was part of the defending Taiwan issue. However, I do distinctly remember the words 'two' and 'China' used back to back by the prez. At the time, I thought it was a pretty remarkable thing for him to say, considering all the trade we do with both places.

Two China....one China. It's all the same as long as we can all still have a cheap s*t Christmas. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Defending Taiwan
...is exactly why the Monkey Prince doesn't want them to declare independence. Do you think he would want to confront China? Absolutely not; remember, "we're sorry, we're very sorry, we're very very sorry" WRT the plane that went down?

Monkey Prince is a true bully...he wouldn't dare take on someone that might be able to fight back. It is another reason he refuses to confront North Korea--the have a real military.

Monkey Prince is a coward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC