Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No More Mr. Nice Guy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:18 AM
Original message
No More Mr. Nice Guy
"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce and brave man, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
- Mark Twain

"Fear not the path of truth, for the lack of people walking on it."
- Robert Francis Kennedy


With Al Gore’s endorsement of Howard Dean’s Presidential run, the former Vice-President has laid down a challenge for his fellow Democrats. It’s time to for them to get serious about winning the next election. It’s my opinion that Gore is completely sincere and concerned about them savaging each other over moot points. He’s obviously been watching and thinks it’s time for the Democratic Leadership Council to stop worrying about whether or not they can beat George W Bush. Rather, it is imperative that they win the next election. He wants everyone in his party to get onside with the strongest candidate early and concentrate on defeating the Bush-Cheney regime.

Gore, though an insider in the Byzantine world of the New World Order, represents the hermetic, humanistic and egalitarian ideal that the founding fathers meant to forge back in 1776. He understands clearly how dangerous it would be for the United States to be under control of the current Administration and their neo-conservative, neo-Fascist, Machiavellian agenda. He knows the implications to America’s standing internationally, and I’m sure he sees the domestic turmoil that could occur should the Bushistas push ahead with their far right agenda.

Think back to the 2000 election when Presidential Candidate Gore warned the voters that peace and prosperity itself was at stake on that ballot. Obviously, Mr. Gore is of the belief that much more than that may be at stake in 2004.

Taking a look around the world now, and seeing how Bush’s Doctrine of Preemption is making the world more unstable, I can imagine many of Gore’s pals at the Council On Foreign Relations are getting as little nervous.

Gore’s motivation for this bold move, and it was bold judging from the pique the other nominees displayed at the last Democratic candidates debate, is very clear. He views Dean as the only candidate with the passion, drive and grassroots support to be able to defeat George W Bush in 2004.

It’s very interesting that Gore offered his support even after Dean made his first statement alluding to the unanswered questions surrounding 9-11. When former Georgia Representative Cynthia McKinney asked similar questions she was hounded out of office by both the Republicans, who wanted her to shut up, and her fellow Democrats, who have yet to collectively pressure the Bush Administration into holding an open, unfettered and truly independent investigation. There is a strong grassroots movement for just such an open hearing, but the Corporate Media is twisting itself, pretzel like, into historic propaganda infamy with the intensity of their willingness to help the cover up.

It seems the media has forgotten a very important journalistic tenet. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.

How zealous is the American faux fifth estate in its duty to their corporate and political masters? Consider that the obvious use of terrorism by Russian President Vladimir Putin to consolidate his autocratic rule in that former, and soon to be reborn, totalitarian state receives not even a passing mention. I guess that when Bush looked into Putin’s soul and proclaimed him trust worthy, that was good enough for the faith based mainstream media.

When former Congressman Max Cleland, the one passionate advocate for the 9-11 victim’s families on the Kean Commission panel, was quietly removed last week I smelled a rat. There was a hopeful campaign started by truth seekers to urge Democratic Minority leader Tom Daschle to replace Cleland with a representative of the families.

Sadly, the reliably pliant Daschle once again caved into pressure. With the announcement of admitted war criminal and intel insider Bob Kerrey, it’s obvious that there is a tacit agreement among the political leadership of both parties to aid in the obfuscation of the investigation. Daschle must remember clearly the warnings that both Bush and Cheney issued to him after the 9-11 attacks: limit the investigation. Hmmm. You’d think they had something to hide. They sure act like they do. One plus one usually equals two. Too bad the journalists working for the Corporate Media can’t add.

Unfortunately, even if the Democratic Party regains the White House, I doubt the cover up will be challenged. I’m sure that Bush would issue a series of preemptive pardons for his ethically and morally challenged cohorts if he had to, and he can rest assured that the Democratic Party is laced with those that would rather the truth not be known than have the office of the Presidency so tarnished.

No doubt, the manufactured Terror War will go on.

Even so, I would also like to give my own endorsement to Howard Dean. Even though I’m a Canadian citizen and have no direct say in the 2004 election, I am a citizen of the global village. And from where I stand, Howard Dean may be the only hope the American people have to correct the currently insane foreign policy that the Bush Administration has unleashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Page Two kick
it took 5 minutes - new record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. "a tacit agreement among the political leadership of both parties..."
there doesn't seem to be much said about ENRON or even worse... our new PNAC FOREIGN POLICY especially PREVENTIVE WAR.

we all need to press our reps and ask the media about this apparant NEW WORLD ORDER.

RB love your stuff as usual and appreciate all you do to stimulate debate and pass the word :toast:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. thanks
hey pilgrim, i clicked on your GFP fund drive page, and the "Home" button has the wrong url. you left out the s in news.

by the way, go to my site. members.shaw.ca/rbham and contact me through my e-mail, i need your personal e-mail so I can send this article to you as an attachment (it has embedded links) for you to put it up on your site.

whatta ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. hear hear!
or is it here here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. sad state of affairs indeed ---- excellent commentary
hear hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. The 2000 election couldn't have been stolen...
Edited on Fri Dec-12-03 11:27 AM by Q
...without the same type of 'tacit' agreement between the parties. Many Democrats are left wondering why the party didn't fight harder to expose the corruption and fraud surrounding that election. It's as if the party simply gave up. There was a hint of an 'agreement' when Lieberman and other Dems were hitting the talk shows asking Gore to concede and not dispute the illegal military ballots.

- Coincidentally...we see the very same politicos bashing Dean that trashed Gore for his outspokenness against the Bush* regime since the infamous election. Any candidate who gets into the details of these issues becomes the target of not only of the Republicans who have a lot to hide...but certain factions within the Democratic party.

- It has become painfully obvious that certain groups and politicians don't want the truth to come out about the election OR 9-11 OR Bush's lies about Iraq. How could this be in a 'free country'? The answer is that we're no more 'free' to learn the truth than occupied Iraq.

- I haven't chosen a candidate as of yet...but I agree that those who are doing their best to coverup the corruption and malfeasance of the Bush* administration are afraid of Gore and Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. All well and good
but as a patriot, I say wait until the people have spoken before the main battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. errr....
like the last election? i mean, selection.

9-11 is the key to 2004.

just like it was in 2002.

if bush is allowed to keep using 9-11 as a moral justification, there is no chance to unseat him.

9-11 is the key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, 9/11 is the key
and letting the people speak means let the democrats decide their candidate to oppose bush before lining up behind a particular one. Anyway, bush must go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. yes, bush must go
for all our sakes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think you're wrong, RB....
Edited on Fri Dec-12-03 11:41 AM by blm
Dean's campaign has been fueled by the corporate media focus. BushInc. needs Kerry and his team taken out and have used Dean's campaign to do that.

You, of all people, should know better. Remember, Cheney smeared Kerry as a "conspiracy theorist nut" back in the BCCI and IranContra days. You think BushInc. doesn't know what he can do? Has any lawmaker alive uncovered more government corruption than John Kerry?

BUSH NEEDS THESE MEN SILENCED
John Kerry assembled a team to confront Bush on the issues Rove wants to take to the American people in 2004. National security and the fear of terrorism. No doubt, the last thing Rove needs are experts in those areas speaking out during the general election against Bush and for the Democratic opponent.

Gary Hart, knows more about national security and antiterrorism measures than any national figure. He is the author of the Hart-Rudman report which was delivered to Bush in Jan. 2001 after a 2 1/2 year study commissioned by Clinton. The report wasn't dealt with at all prior to 9-11.

Rand Beers, former National Security Official, knows the inner workings of the Bush team's post 9-11 efforts, of which he observed mostly inertia and incompetence.

Max Cleland, 9-11 commission, knows the Bush team is trying to pull a fast one on the American people by covering up crucial information of dealings that led to 9-11. Has been speaking out to groups across the country, and swinging the AWOLSTICK as a bonus.

Gen. William Perry, Clinton's expert on nuclear arms proliferation and N. Korea, knows Bush's failures on the serious Korea issue and his incompetence in dealing with its threat.

Joe Wilson, the man who knows TOO much. Exposed Cheney's office as the source for cooked intelligence reports on Iraq. Also alerted public to treasonous acts by White House in exposing his wife, an undercover CIA agent. Many in intel community aligning with Wilson and his wife against the WH.

The media is loathe to give these men the airtime at this point because they are too damaging to Bush on his perceived strengths. They can afford to ignore them and the substance of their case against Bush because they are selling the American people the "process" of the primary horserace as entertainment. If Kerry were the nominee, the media would have no choice but to feature his spokespeople on the various issues.

Kerry assembled a team to TAKE BUSH DOWN, while some others assembled a team to take Kerry down. Democrats need to take this into consideration. BushInc. NEEDS these men and their message muted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Kerry worries me
Skull and Bones, ya know.

Look, I like Kerry. And he'd be way better than Bush.

I like Clark too.

But I think Dean can win.

And I trust Gore more than Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Then why are the S&Bers who control so much
making sure Dean gets all the focus? You never even heard that Kerry spoke to the VFW convention and ripped into Bush to the applause of the veterans, did you? Nope, they only gave you the speeches from Condi and Rummy with tepid applause. No Kerry. That was last summer.

Kerry also said last June that he would draft a resolution AGAINST the FCC changes. Dean got the press plane shortly after.

Where's your keen sniffer, my friend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Sorry, but Kerry took himself out...I talked to those insider drones
and they are clueless.

Only the GOP assembled a team to take down any
and all Democratic candidates. They target whoever
is on top at the moment. That is why I hate all
the candidate bashing, as opposed to factual
analysis of candidate positions.

Kerry has had time and money, and he has not
started any fires. You want to blame that on
the media? I don't think so. Kerry went around
like the annointed one, didn't organize, and
got beat.

If Rand Beers is such hot stuff, what has he
done for Kerry's standing? Kerry had better
use him before he loses the primaries.


arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
library_max Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Excellent commentary.
I haven't committed to Dean yet, but I'm leaning more and more in that direction. Fortunately or unfortunately, our primary will come so late in the game that it won't matter much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gringo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick
I'm bedeviled by the doubts about Dean's electability, but nothing any Clarkie has said has been enough to really win me over. I realize that the whore media might go a bit easier on Clark, but if Clark doesn't excite democrats, he can't win either, swing voters or no swing voters.

Of the candidates with a fighting chance, Dean seems closer to representing my beliefs than Clark, Kerry or Gephardt. So I've stuck with Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC