Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Appears to Open Door to Same-Sex Unions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:47 PM
Original message
Bush Appears to Open Door to Same-Sex Unions
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush on Tuesday appeared to open the door to same-sex unions that stop short of marriage, by saying people should be able to make "whatever legal arrangements" they want as long as it is recognized by a state.

Bush made clear he would not go so far as to support gay marriage, however. He said in the interview with ABC News that he would support a constitutional amendment to "honor" marriage as between a man and a woman.

snip

Bush's comments sparked concern among conservatives seeking an outright constitutional ban on gay marriage, as well as from gay rights groups who have argued for legalizing same-sex unions.

"While I'm encouraged President Bush says he supports a Constitutional amendment honoring marriage between a man and woman, I'm very concerned about his additional comments which seem to suggest the definition of marriage, which pre-dates Western civilization and the United States Constitution, can be redefined at the state level," said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.

The group, which has made a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage its top election-year priority, expressed concern about Bush's remarks.

The Human Rights campaign, a gay and lesbian rights group, said it was "gravely concerned" by Bush's comments supporting a constitutional amendment, but wanted to study them further. "Any attempt to use this amendment to score a few votes is a strategy sure to backfire and cost elected officials their claims of compassionate conservatives," it said.

http://wireservice.wired.com/wired/story.asp?section=Breaking&storyId=806945&tw=wn_wire_story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Change of plans now that Saddam is in hand?
Is this part of the shaping of Election 2004? I think he'll be running on National Security and with some number fudging an improving economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe He Can Piss Off Both Sides
That would be fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow--this move
doesn't exactly play to his base. There are some (I know one such person) who would consider voting for Dean except for the "civil union" thing. I don't see how this can gain him votes, unless they did some polling somewhere with really surprising results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cirej2000 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's hoping that it will fail somewhere in congress
Don't believe the hype. He's a right-wing, southern Christian! This is a purely political move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleDannySlowhorse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. This reminds me of an Onion headline
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 09:08 PM by LittleDannySlowhorse
"Pat Buchanan to gays: 'I promise not to incinerate you.'"

If this means Bush is courting the gay vote, he is SORELY mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. If this doesn't bring Buchanan into the race, nothing will
Go Pat Go!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. To me, this story is an indication that the WH is not so confident
of their chances next year. If they were, they would be crowing about the constitutional ban on same sex marriage and steer clear of civil unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC