Should we Google-Bomb to debunk RW spin?

[mot78]

We'll soon be facing a downpour of Repug lies and spin that is difficult to debunk, even with the many rapid response site we have. I think that the best method to counter the spin is to Google-Bomb Google and other search engines. For example, someone types in "Wesley Clark" or "Wesley Clark praising Bush" or "Clark Waco" and the first websites listed under the results will be ones devoted exclusively to debunking these lies. It's the most efficient way to inform the public while wiggling through the net of censorship that is the whore media.

[wahoo]

1. That sounds like a great idea.

Do you anyone who can do this?

[sid dicious]

2. Hmmm

And what is the goal of this madness. Smoke and mirrors to combat perceived spin? What about some substance here!

[mot78]

3. It is using substance

At least we're not trying to Freep polls to sway public opinion.

[Skittles]

16. PERCEIVED spin?

WTF are you TALKING about?

[msanger]

4. miserable failure

Isn't this the technique you use to get things like "miserable failure" to lead directly to a bush site?

[Darkseid69]

5. not exactly

It leads direct to the bio page of Bush on the White House website

[creativelcro]

7. Some info on how to do it etc.

http://www.blah3.com/graymatter/archives/00000654.html

[creativelcro]

6. Ok, so, what do you want to associate ?

It seems that we only need a very few sites to do the trick. If they consistently link things that we want to get associated by the search engine...

[Must_B_Free]

8. Let's get DU into Google Bombing

then let old Rupert take advantage of the word "bomb" associatively, to suggest that Democrats are all terrorists. After all we know thay love Saddam. Look, they embrace the tactics of terror - they attack america with "bombs"!

Good thinking my fellw undercover disruptive freepers!

We'll take DU down with us!

[creativelcro]

9. This is a personal attack.

Calling us undercover disruptive freepers, that is.

[Turkw]

10. Not Bombing, "hugging", we will google "hug" we bring thing togerther

So no more bombing, where is the link to google "hugging" again?

[Turkw]

11. Yes, and not stop there

seems I'm not the only one who is thinking along these lines. I just posted a thread about fighting to win.

[blondeatlast]

12. Posted a "threat?" Normally, I wouldn't call attention to a tiny typo, but

[Ksec]

13. The fattest Hog always gets slaughtered nt

[Turkw]

14. thanks, corrected now :)

[Ksec]

15. And right now Bush is BossHog himself nt