Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Military Draft Has Already Started Folks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:25 PM
Original message
The Military Draft Has Already Started Folks
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 05:26 PM by Yavin4
If you don't allow military personnel to retire when their time has come, that's called conscripted service, or a draft. Follow this link:

Army Stops Many Soldiers From Quitting

Excerpt:
To many of the soldiers whose retirements and departures are on ice, however, stop-loss is an inconvenience, a hardship and, in some cases, a personal disaster. Some are resigned to fulfilling what they consider their patriotic duty. Others are livid, insisting they have fallen victim to a policy that amounts to an unannounced, unheralded draft.

An enlistment contract has two parties, yet only the government is allowed to violate the contract; I am not," said Costas, 42, who signed an e-mail from Iraq this month "Chained in Iraq," an allusion to the fact that he and his fellow reservists remained in Baghdad after the active-duty unit into which they were transferred last spring went home. He has now been told that he will be home late next June, more than a year after his contractual departure date. "Unfair. I would not say it's a draft per se, but it's clearly a breach of contract. I will not reenlist."


On edit: I would sue the military in order to get my release.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Happens in every war
Happened in Bosnia, from what I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do You Have A Link or Proof That It Happened In Bosnia?!
Because you're using dittohead logic, which states that everything that's wrong under Bush also happened under Clinton, so I don't accept your argument without proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hokay....
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 05:34 PM by Superfly
Here you go mon frair

Clintons Stop Loss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. But was it used in Bosnia?
The article says Clinton authorized stop-loss, but was it ever used?

I personally don't believe it was from my own experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes it was...
I was active duty during that time. (still in, but reserves, now)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I hope you'll understand...
But I would like to see a cite showing it was used.

Like I said, it wasn't used as far as my experience goes (Pentagon liaison for NATO forces).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. I do
read the piece that was posted, it is in there

And as I said, it was very small and it came and went
without most noticing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. well, there goes this talking point...
another one torpedoed by a freeper.

Oh well, the difference is we accept truth when confronted with it (some of it, anyway, sometimes...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. "liasing"....
is generally not seen as a vital military MOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Thank you
I knew I remembered it correctly. Even without dittohead logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It did
Stop Loss does happen when wars occur

Here is the major difference, In Bosnia it occurred in a very limited way for MISSION CRITICAL PERSONNEL, such as MPs and Medical, and it was over very fast... as soon as the war was over.

That is why it never registered with most people, or the press and it affected a very small number of soldiers, by percentage in the total force.

Oh and this is mentioned in teh article that she posted if you care to read it.

The major difference are the number of stop loss orders signed by this administration

Now I have to wonder why they have not gone the FDR route... who basically gave the order, you will remain in teh service for the duration plus six months (if you were alrady in) and this has been my particular nightmare, as my hubby is less than two months from Retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Well, its official...
the mouthpiece has begun to speak of the draft....The programming of the ditto heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. I want to add that..........
The guy who filled for Limpbag today kind of touched around the edges of a draft. He said that kids need structure today and the military would give them that. it would be a good thing for todays youth to serve. He than went on to say that we will need 60 to 70 thousand more troops to deal with "other" countries around the world like Iraq, and we should not have to let other countries like the UN, control any of these countries that we "liberate." It`s coming. If this asshole gets elected again, there will be nothing to stop them from doing what they want as a lame duck administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. So all the denials to the contrary
and oh boy, Rummy and Wolfie being on record that they want a draft
but they're not planing for one.. yes the on again, off again is
funny... is all bluster?

You mean it is coming?

Get outta here!

You damn lib'ral spreadign lies

:-)

Yes this is the dittohead programmed sarcasm folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wingnut Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Rummy and Wolfie being on record that they want a draft?
got a link? I need to see this.

Thanks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. The chickenhawks will come home to roost if that ever happens.
My god, can you hear the whining dittoheads.

The 18-22 dittoheads who were so pro-war will finally get their chance to 'serve their country'. I'm sure they'll happily give up their frat parties and donate a few years of their lives, if not their lives, to a cause greater than themselves. The 36-50 year old dittoheads will be having 18-22 year old kids given the honor of serving. I'm sure they will offer their kids up with relish!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Clinton was truthful about why we were in there, and our
soldiers were not mercenaries for halliburton and Bechtel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He's now "The Clinton"?
Is that like "The Buddha"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sable302 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. exactomundo
The simple fact that they refused to call it Operation Iraqi Liberation in the first place, just goes to show that we all know what THIS war was really all about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. I think there were mercenaries(contractors) actually
The company that was busted for sex slavery was in the Balkans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Congress has to declare war for it to be effective.
You can't just violate a contact because Bush* call it a war. IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. It allows the President to
keep trained, experienced servicemembers from departing at their pre determined retirement date because he erred. Many in government look at STOPLOSS as a personnel management tool. (THAT SHO NUFF SOUNDS GOOD DON' IT?) If bush and his henchmen had established a policy to fight terrorism instead of securing oil fields this effort to keep older servicemembers in uniform would not be necessary. Please pass the word. When some dumbass conservative neighbor of yours says this is a good idea, please, talk slowly and explain to him what a fucking moron he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. This will be one of the most harsh things I say....today.
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 06:12 PM by Cannikin
By God, let the ditto heads put there money where there mouths are and sign up to fight! Let them go over there for a few tours of duty and see if they still feel like its worth it! LET them face the realities of having there sons and daughters come home in boxes under the cover of secrecy. Let them die while there 'fearless' leader bickers over who will profit from the war.
Maybe then, they will see things differently.

Does anyone know where to access recruitment figures? I bet conservatives are FILLING the bootcamps to go and fight...what? No?

I'll sign up the day the Bush daughters do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Absolutely..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. One cousin stationed in Iraq has already signed a new contract...
she was scheduled to come home in Sept. but has "signed" for antoher year. She told he mom she would have to tell her about when she got home at the end of her tour. She said she couldn't tell her anything while over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cannikin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Surely you arent saying that our military would 'encourage' her?
Edited on Mon Dec-29-03 06:13 PM by Cannikin
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. She was probably facing a stop loss
It is easier (and more profitable in the short term) for the soldier
to just sign

If she was kept against her, all kinds of shitty details were coming her way

And no... I am not kidding

And yes, she coudl not tell mom, as those calls are monitored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Guessing, from prior military experience, she was told.....
re-enlist and we'll give you a bonus and orders stateside relatively soon, or we extend you here indefinitely.

Really not much of a choice if you want a firm date to go home.

Just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-03 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. My brother had to stay in the last Persian Gulf War.
His contract was up in January. I think he finally got out in April. Yeah, fortunately, it was only a few extra months.

"And just when I was gettin' short."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-03 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
29. Sorry....
part of the contract you sign when you join the military states that they can retain you if they need to. Once you're in, you're in until the Government says you're not, "for the duration". This was a big deal during the Civil War, with many Northerners volunteering for 90 days, and then finding that they were in until the end of the war.

Even people who are nominally "discharged" from the military without prejudice (ie it's not a bad conduct discharge) are still in the military, either in the active or inactive reserves. They can still be called back, even if they've fulfilled their required duty.

It's like "Global Thermonuclear War"...The only winning move is not to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC