Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Buchanan's Primary Bible (running against Bush)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 06:33 PM
Original message
John Buchanan's Primary Bible (running against Bush)
Edited on Fri Jan-02-04 06:37 PM by seventhson
John Buchanan (read his Bush-Nazi US Archive research articles at nhgazette.com) registered as a Republican a month or so ago and is running against Bush in the New Hampshire Republican Primary.

Please read and support his efforts. He IS also a DUer!


He sent this out a few hours ago.


My personal goal is a treason trial for both George W. Bush and his Daddy. We’ll see what history brings, eh?

I’m beginning to think I’ll make an excellent President! Keep the faith.

Thanks.

BUCHANAN

Republican for President

2004





“Campaign Manifesto”

Issues, Questions & Answers







January 1, 2004



WHY I’M RUNNING





A CHALLENGE TO

THE PRESS & THE PUBLIC.





To use the truth & the facts

to demonstrate to

fellow Republicans and

the American people

that George W. Bush

is a liar and war criminal

guilty of treason.







These extraordinary allegations

are made by a working national journalist

with great respect for

the Office of the Presidency,

and even greater respect

for the responsibility of

the average citizen to

stand up for truth and honor

in times of national crisis.





MY TWO BIG QUESTIONS







1. Do the truth and honor

still matter in this country?





2. Who “owns” the government –

“we the people” or

big corporate interests?







THE BOTTOM-LINE QUESTIONS







Is the Republican Party of the 21st Century

the party of Lincoln

or the party of Halliburton?





Does the Republican Party

have a genuine social conscience?





Do the facts matter?





If so, what should be done?





IN THE END, IT IS A MORAL ISSUE,

NOT A POLITICAL ISSUE.







THE CRITICAL ‘CONTEXT’





Mark Twain:



“A lie can travel half-way around the world

while the truth is still putting its shoes on.”





Even he never envisioned the “24-hour news cycle.”





THE MEDIA HAS DISTORTED REALITY,

with a sort of “brain-washing”

we the people have allowed to happen.





A ‘NEED TO KNOW’ BASIS FOR GOVERNMENT.







WHAT WOULD THOMAS JEFFERSON DO?





“Enlighten the people, generally, and

tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like spirits at the dawn of day.”





“A nation under a well-regulated government

should permit none to remain uninstructed.

It is monarchical and aristocratic government only

that requires ignorance for its support.”







WHAT JAMES MADISON ADDED:



“A popular government, without popular information,

or the means of acquiring it,

is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both.

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance,

and a people who mean to be

their own governors

must arm themselves with the power

which knowledge gives.”





“Conscience is the most sacred of all property.”





MY THREE BIG ISSUES





1. “9/11 – What Really Happened?”







2. “The War with Iraq:

‘Liberation’ based on

Lies & Deceit”







3. “Betrayal of

Campaign Promises

& Core Republican Values”





9/11 – WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?





Does it trouble you

that more than two years later,

none of the major questions

surrounding September 11th

have been answered

by our government?





Does it bother you

that the President

has tried to quash

every investigation

into those tragic events –

the worst failure in the history

of the U.S.?





Should the President and his administration

be held publicly accountable for

the answers to lingering questions

about what really happened?







The Four Critical Issues



Given the enormity of what happened on 9/11, it is imperative that any serious investigation focus relentlessly on four (4) key issues, which must be integrated into any final “report” according to both time lines and findings

of fact.



Foreknowledge



What did senior members of the Bush administration know, and when did they know it?



What, if anything, did they do in response to warnings of an Al Qaeda attack on U.S. soil?



If they took action, why were their decisions and policies not effective in protecting Americans from the carnage?



If they failed to take action, why? Who is responsible?



Stand-Down



In light of the administration’s comprehensive & nearly incomprehensible failure to defend against the attacks, both before and during the events of 9/11, is it possible that a “stand-down” order prevented any suitable and successful response, such as scrambling U.S. fighter jets to shoot down the hijacked planes?



If such a “stand-down” existed, was it as a result of the Project for a New American Century report, circulated in late 2000, that cited the need for a “Pearl Harbor”-like attack to rally the American people to necessary wars with Afghanistan and Iraq?



Accountability



Who was ultimately responsible, at the various levels of government and the military, for the failures of 9/11? Why has no one been held accountable? What were the pivotal decisions and actions – or lack thereof – that led to the disaster?



Obstruction of Investigations



Why has the Bush administration consistently failed to support proper investigation of the events of September 11th?

What are they hiding and why?



The American people have a right to see and assess all available evidence in order to draw their own conclusions.





The Big Questions



Of the many questions that have been raised by amateur sleuths and seasoned conspiracy theorists around the world, there are but a few that are critical enough to any informed inquiry that they alone can help resolve much of the mystery of 9/11.



Because of the apparent “complexity” of what transpired on September 11th, the most direct and insidious questions have mutated into a myriad of unanswered questions, all worthy of official explanation in a spirit of national closure.



However, for any inquiry to be effective, it must be focused. These are the “major” questions that should be at the heart of any serious inquiry conducted on behalf of the American people and the world.



What did the President know and when did he know it?

Initially, the President and his top aides categorically denied any foreknowledge of a terrorist attack using hijacked planes.



Specifically, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice went on record as saying: “no one could have predicted that they would use a…hijacked airplane as a missile.” In light of official government reports and detailed warnings from foreign governments and our own FBI and CIA, one Republican member of the 9/11 Commission has dubbed Rice’s comment “unfortunate.”



What did Dr. Rice tell President Bush on August 6, 2001 about Al Qaeda threats against the United States?

In a still-secret daily briefing prepared by the CIA and delivered by Dr. Rice, specific details of an imminent attack on the U.S. were discussed. What was done by the President, by Dr. Rice, by others, as a direct result of those discussions?



The White House now says it issued threat warnings to “the aviation industry.” Why were those threats not revealed to the American people? Why was nothing else done? Who should be held accountable for the failure that cost almost 3,000 American lives?



The August 6 briefing memo, which the White House is refusing to release based on a claim of executive privilege, is “the smoking gun” of any 9/11

investigation. It is the 9/11 equivalent of Nixon’s Watergate tapes.



It must be taken as seriously.



Please demand that your Congressman and Senators demand release of the document to the 9/11 Commission for its January 2004 hearings. It is the only way we can know what George W. Bush knew – and when.



The American people, and the press, must demand that information – and then check it against the facts.

Given that there had been so many warnings, how is it possible that NORAD air defenses failed on the massive scale that they did?

For decades, it has been strict U.S. defense policy that fighter jets scramble within minutes to address any stray or unaccounted for aircraft in U.S. airspace.

There are any number of instances on the public record when jets were dispatched to monitor errant private aircraft.



Why did the system fail so completely on September 11th? Who is responsible for the fact that none of the four hijacked planes were intercepted by U.S. fighters? Why has that person not been held accountable and publicly identified? Why has there been no official investigation of what happened?



Any fair and reasonable inquiry into these questions seems to indicate that a “stand-down” policy had been implemented in a way that prevented a proper and effective response to the attacks.



Who made a small fortune “shorting” airline and insurance stocks before 9/11?

“On September 10, the trading ratio on United Airlines stock was 25 times greater than normal at the Pacific Exchange,” the Philadelphia Inquirer reported on September 11, 2003. Much of the business was in “puts,” meaning the investor was betting the stock would soon decline in value. That’s precisely what happened to both United and American Airlines after the tracks.

Yet, despite the high-tech capabilities of the SEC and other government agencies in tracking money in the transnational world of cyber-space and offshore banking havens, neither the traders nor the funds have been accounted for.



Why not?



What’s in the 28 pages of “redacted” material from last summer’s Congressional 9/11 report?

Along with the first question (“What did the President know and when did he know it?”), this is the other half of “the smoking gun” of 9/11.

The information was redacted at the direct request of the White House.



So far, leaks to the press have indicated that the blacked-out pages detail the complicity of Saudi Arabia – the world’s #1 financier of state-funded terrorism – in the conspiracy that led to September 11th.



If so, why would the Bush administration intentionally cover up that information?



Once again, the answer in simple – and very troubling.



It is a fact that the Bush family – both George W. Bush and his father – have done business with the Saudis and the bin Ladens since the 1970s, when Salem bin Laden, deceased brother of Osama bin Laden, secretly invested in George W. Bush’s fledgling oil business via a Houston middleman named James Bath.



Since leaving the White House in 1992, George H.W. Bush has done billions of dollars in business with the Saudis via the top-secret Carlyle Group, for which Bush is a “paid adviser.”



With his son in the White House, and the Saudis as the top suspects for “institutional” responsibility for 9/11, that seems to constitute an unprecedented “conflict of interests” – for both the sitting President and the ex-President.



If the Saudis were, in fact, largely responsible for 9/11, and it is proven that George W. Bush blocked an investigation to protect his family’s secretive business dealings with the Saudi regime, would that rise to a standard of treason?

This is the ultimate question that must be addressed and answered, based on factual evidence and sworn testimony, if the events of September 11th are to be put behind us.



The American people have a right to know the answers to these and many other related questions.



Under the best-case scenario, the Bush administration failed miserably and massively in its primary Constitutional responsibility of protecting the American people. Even under that standard, those most directly responsible for the failure should be held accountable.

Under the worst-case scenario, the Bush administration is guilty of treason in its complicity in the murder of nearly three thousand innocent civilians as a result of its unholy alliance with the West-hating Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia, the Bush family patron state.





THE WAR WITH IRAQ



What the facts show:



1. The entire Iraq campaign,

from start to finish,

was based on lies & deceit

by the entire Bush administration.





2. The motive for

the lies & deceit was

a secret agreement

to adhere to a right-wing agenda

authored before the 2000 election

by the militaristic “think tank”

Project for a New American Century?





3. The “bottom line”

was massive war profiteering.





THE ‘BIG FIVE’ IRAQ LIES



These fabrications were repeated relentlessly

by every senior member

of the Bush administration,

from the President to

National Security Adviser

Condoleezza Rice –

and published as truth by the media.



1. “The IAEA Report”

Result: Discredited by IAEA



2. “The UN Photos”

Result: Discredited by UN



3. “The Aluminum Tubes”

Result: Discredited by scientists



4. “The 10 Downing Street Report”

Result: Discredited by media leak



5. The Big One: “Uranium from Africa”

Result: Discredited by CIA and

former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson





THE REAL & SECRET AGENDA



Project for New American Century,

before George W. Bush was even elected

and more than a year before 9/11,

called for:



1. Invasion of both Afghanistan & Iraq.

The motive?

“Protection of oil interests.”



2. A doctrine of U.S. “pre-eminence”

against its “enemies.”



3. A “galvanizing” event,

on the order of Pearl Harbor,

to create the will to fight wars.





HOW DID IT GET SOLD?



Co-conspirator #1



Ahmed Chalabi, bank swindler &

hand-picked “future President of Iraq,”

who promised flowers & dancing in the streets.



Instead, we got car bombs and

“improvised explosive devices.”





Co-conspirator #2



“National Security” Adviser

Condoleezza Rice,

who is either grossly incompetent,

or seriously misinformed,

or a liar.





Co-conspirator #3



Vice President Dick Cheney, former CEO of Halliburton,

who strong-armed the CIA and defense intelligence

to fabricate justifications for war

while he daily reinforced

the Bush administration’s “big lies.”





NET RESULT OF THE LIES



From the POV of the American people:



1. Nearly 500 U.S. soldiers dead

& thousands wounded, and

thousands of Iraqis killed.



2. Loss of American esteem

around the world,

particularly in “old Europe.”



3. Enormous expense

to American taxpayers –

nearly $200 billion the first year.



4. A fundamental shift

in the geopolitical balance of power

versus the European Union.





NET RESULT OF THE LIES



From the POV of defense contractors

& private “homeland defense” companies:





1. Billions of dollars in profits

for secretive private companies

such as The Carlyle Group

and Halliburton/Bechtel.





2. The rapid growth of a global market

dominated by U.S. arms merchants

as a matter of “policy might.”





3. Successful military intimidation of

the rest of the world, both foe and “ally.”





BETRAYAL OF CAMPAIGN PROMISES





1. “No nation-building.”

Result: Iraq & Afghanistan



2. “Enforce fiscal responsibility.”

Result: biggest deficit in history



3. “Restore honor & integrity to the White House.”

Result: CIA leak, failure to hold anyone

accountable for 9/11,

attempts to quash 9/11 investigations,

lies & deceit to justify

Iraq invasion & occupation.



4. “Uphold the Constitution.”

Result: Patriot Act, detention of

U.S. citizens such as Jose Padilla

without legal representation

or Constitutional protections.

The result: your family member or friend

could literally disappear on the word

of John Ashcroft.





BETRAYAL OF REPUBLICAN VALUES





1. Soaring deficits.

Result: debt burden for generations to come



2. Preferential treatment of the rich.

Result: An “elite” class that is above the law



3. A sellout to big government.

Result: A direct betrayal of a major campaign promise

and what is perhaps the quintessential Republican value



4. Failure to protect America’s borders.

Result: the attacks and still unexplained failure of 9/11

and unprecedented illegal immigration

that steals jobs from U.S. citizens

and incurs huge costs such as unpaid health care services.



5. Failure to protect America’s jobs.

Result: “Free trade,” the ultimate corporate concession

to the “globalization” that has cost 3 million jobs,

including one of every eight manufacturing jobs.







THE LAST WORD





If these allegations and/or analyses are accurate,

is such behavior

by a sitting President

from our party

acceptable to you?





If these allegations are factual,

should George W. Bush

and other members of

his administration

be held accountable for their actions?





The bottom line:

who is in control,

“us” or “them?”





DO YOU CARE ENOUGH

TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?









BACK TO THE BIG QUESTIONS









Does truth and honor

still matter in this country?







Who “owns”

the government?





HOW TO FIX AMERICA







Even accurate, sincere criticism

is worthless if no solution

to the problem is offered.





John Buchanan, a career journalist

who has covered

politics and government

in major media markets,

offers a detailed, visionary

approach to fixing America.





NEW IDEAS FOR

TRANSFORMING U.S. CULTURE,

FROM TOP TO BOTTOM.



The bottom line:

Taking back the country from corporate interests







MY POSITIONS ON KEY ISSUES



I will end the corporate stranglehold on government and politics.

I will remove the corporate influence from American politics by making it illegal for corporate/business entities to contribute to candidates or political parties.



I will outlaw political action committees (PACs).



I will make it illegal for any corporation or business entity to in any way influence or promote the vote of any employee or induce involvement in any political or social cause.



I will outlaw professional lobbying.



I will end war profiteering by former government officials and Washington insiders.

I will require that all U.S. defense contractors adhere to a strict new policy of financial transparency, monitored on behalf of the American people by a new Congressional subcommittee in both the House and Senate, which release public reports audited by the Government Accounting Office (GAO).



I will make it illegal for former high government officials to participate in defense-related for-profit businesses.



I will create a Citizens Defense Oversight Board, to consist of defense and aerospace CEOs, trade journalists, academicians, scientists, and private citizens representing the full spectrum of U.S. society.



I will hold corporations accountable for their actions.

Corporations have no Constitutional rights, only citizens do. Nevertheless, the public trust is regularly and seriously compromised when corporate interests supercede the interests of the people. As a result, I will introduce new measures to hold corporations accountable to their public charter.



Corporations that violate the interests of the public will be prosecuted, in the name of the American people, by the U.S. Department of Commerce – and could face revocation of their corporate charter by voter referendum.



I will strengthen existing regulatory agencies such as the Securities & Exchange Commission and Federal Communications Commission and develop new initiatives to protect consumer rights.



I will reform the media.

I will reinstate the FCC Fairness Doctrine, mandating that “fair and balanced reporting” be a daily reality on the public airwaves, not a trademarked slogan.



I will roll back the new FCC rules easing ownership by global conglomerates of the entire U.S. media, and institute new policies to promote broader and more localized media ownership in the interests of free speech and vigorous public debate on the issues.



I will create a new “local hour” of required community broadcasting by all network affiliates and independent TV/radio stations.



I will require the media to better serve their public responsibility by regularly airing programming analyzing and covering difficult social issues such as racism, anti-Semitism, religious tensions, and class divisions.



I will create a Citizens Media Oversight Board, nationally and locally, to represent the interests of the public in the making and management of all media policy. The board will consist of journalists, news and media executives, journalism professors, media historians, and an equal number of citizen representatives from the full spectrum of U.S. society.



I will make the FCC charter renewal process for TV and radio stations more directly accountable to the communities they serve.



I will restore government to the American people and take it away from special interests.

I will create new voter registration drives designed to dramatically increase voter participation in all elections as a basic civic duty, particularly among young people 18-25.



I will create a new $2,000 tax penalty for citizens who do not vote. I will create a new tax credit of $2,000 for anyone involved as a volunteer or candidate in the political process.



I will encourage more candidacies, at all levels of government, from among “common citizens,” including women and minorities.



I will create a new program for the public financing of national elections so that campaigns can be conducted free of corporate or institutional influence or financing and be open to good ideas rather than huge bank balances.



I will encourage all states and localities to do the same.



I will shift the financing of the U.S. government from the middle class to the corporations and wealthy individuals who presently pay little or no taxes.

I will aggressively enforce the U.S. tax code and enforce compliance by both corporations and rich individuals.



I will create a new “wealth tax” so that the super-rich pay their fair share toward the general good of society so new ideas and initiatives can be funded by a new revenue stream for the U.S. Treasury.



I will ease and simplify the tax burden of the middle class and increase the “floor” for minimum taxation to bring more struggling families above the poverty line.



Corporations and other business entities who do not pay their fair share of taxes will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.





ADDITIONAL POSITIONS ON ISSUES



On National Security & Defense



Reverse “The Bush Doctrine” of “pre-emptive” military action and use unilateral force only in the most serious of national emergencies.



Focus on Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, not sovereign countries that pose no threat to the U.S.



Use military force only in response to legitimate and imminent threats against the national security of the United States, but only as a last resort after consultation with the UN Security Council and major U.S. allies.



Develop a “peace-keeping” mission under the auspices of the UN, with comprehensive international support, including genuine commitments to troop rotations and logistical support by all UN member states, under the authority of the Security Council.



Create an annual “World Peace Conference” under the banner of the UN, with participation by all member states.



Cut the defense budget by one per cent (1%) per year, or by about $4 billion, and dramatically increase funding of the UN, which presently operates for one year on what the Pentagon spends every 32 days (about $1.2 billion).



On Constitutional Freedoms & Civil Liberties



Rescind The Patriot Act.



Create an ongoing national policy, with widespread public participation and observation by civil liberty groups, for the comprehensive restoration and protection of Constitutional rights and civil liberties in the post-9/11 environment.



Extend full legal protections to U.S. citizens such as Jose Padilla who are accused of being “enemy combatants” and detained secretly and indefinitely without probable cause or due process.



Extend full legal protections, including international representation such as diplomatic entities, to all accused terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Set a deadline for either charging them and trying them in proper U.S. courts, or release them.



Strongly protect Second Amendment rights for all Americans. Guns are not a problem. Criminals are a problem. Fair and intelligent policy must address that reality.



Protect a woman’s reproductive rights, including the right to abortion.



On Taxation & Government Spending



Cut the federal budget by five per cent (5%) per year in a serious effort toward smaller government and a shrinking federal bureaucracy.



Achieve a balanced budget.



Stabilize and improve both Social Security and Medicare as sacred, inviolable government trusts for future generations,

with serious problems that must be repaired by this generation.



Shift the tax burden from the middle class to the wealthy and corporations by significantly reducing taxation on the middle class.



Simplify the tax code.



Tax dividends and capital gains as regular income.



Strengthen the safety net for those living beneath the poverty line and social services, such as day care and safe transportation, for working families.





ABOUT THE CANDIDATE



JOHN BUCHANAN is a nationally published journalist, media/communications consultant and social activist who discovered and published in The New Hampshire Gazette on October 10, 2003 proof from The National Archives and Library of Congress that the grandfather and great-grandfather of President George W. Bush were Nazi traitors to their country and should have been tried for treason. Instead of achieving proper journalistic recognition for his history-making news scoop, Mr. Buchanan found that no major “news” organization in the United States would touch the documents. The New York Times, ABC News, The Washington Post, CNN – they all refused to take possession of the documents or report the story. As a result, Mr. Buchanan has created a Presidential campaign based on a simple and critically important national objective – taking back the country and the Republican party from the global corporations, war profiteers and conglomerate media that have hijacked the rights of the people – the true owners of government as envisioned by Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams -- in the name of bottom-line profits for global corporations.







WHAT I WANT YOU TO DO





1. GET MAD!!!



2. Contact your Congressperson

and both of your state’s U.S. Senators,

and let them know your outrage.

Demand investigation of these allegations.





3. Contact your local media,

the Editor of your local newspaper,

and the News Directors of

your local TV and radio stations,

and demand that they

expose the truth – NOW.





4. Register your protest

by voting for the honest

Republican alternative – John Buchanan.


PLEASE JOIN OUR CAMPAIGN TO

TAKE BACK AMERICA – FOR REAL



We need volunteers and donors immediately!!!



Please visit our Web site at www.johnbuchanan.org

and get involved TODAY.



It’s YOUR country.



Stand up for it – NOW. Please.



Call (305) 535-9606 or e-mail

jtwg@bellsouth.net





These materials were produced and distributed

by Buchanan for President 2004,

Miami Beach, Florida.

January 2004

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nevermind....
Edited on Fri Jan-02-04 07:23 PM by kalian
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. no comments from ANYBODY?
This guy, who has posted here at DU, puts his life on the line for US, and there is dead silence?


No wonder America is in the shitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unfortunately,he will
be ignored by the media and by Bush. Sad but true.

MzPip
:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turkw Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. We should go the the Repub sites and write letters as Repubs supporting
Buchanan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smokie Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Damn straight!!
So ... he's in the NH primary? Let's hope he pulls a lot of votes and gets some serious attention. He sure deserves it.

How can ya argue with his platform? He lays out a good course for the future of America... I wish him luck in seeing his goals come to fruition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. PLUS - He's a DUer!!!
He only posted a few times, but he did come here to try to gather some support.

He can only help us with this effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. DUer for President? kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, great. But "Who is dis whacko?"
That's going to be the presumptive question. He's a savvy guy, and I expect he'll get some coverage just from being presumptuous enough to put his hat in the ring, combined with the fact that it's in New Hampshire and the GOP campaign season will just be getting under way.

So the key is that, when they condescend to give him a little "lighter moments" coverage, he gives them as little as possible to put him in the "Look at this nutjob" box all prepared for him.

So what they'll do, obviously, is ignore everything except this:

is it possible that a “stand-down” order prevented any suitable and successful response, such as scrambling U.S. fighter jets to shoot down the hijacked planes?

and this:

the Bush administration is guilty of treason in its complicity in the murder of nearly three thousand innocent civilians

—Har har har, whatta nutjob. Over to you Biff.

I think his "raising the questions" approach is great, but this stuff is going to get him shrink-wrapped, boxed up and safely stowed away on the shelf marked "Campaign Jokes, Novelties and Eccentrics" before he can inject any of his less-easily-laughed-off points into the discussion. I am deeply sympathetic to the desire there, but for strategic reasons I'd urge him to step back just a bit from this kind of thing. There are lots of damning questions you can ask (and he does ask a lot of 'em) without offering yourself up to easy dismissal like that.

Hope this is taken as constructive criticism: I stand in awe of this guy's courage and initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Mini e-mail campaign begins now
I'm copying this main post. I will shorten it some and leave the web link in.

then I'm going to e-mail it to everyone I know in NH -- and encourage them to pass it on around the Granite State.

I think Buchanan deserves a look see from NH Voters.

Up in Franconia Notch, the Old Man of the Mountain lost his face - literally - the day after Bush pulled his pilot-with-a-codpiece stunt on the aircraft carrier last May "Mission Accomplished."

I take this loss of face in the Granite State as an OMEN that the appointee-in-chief can be wounded in the NH Primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hadn't made that connection!
Up in Franconia Notch, the Old Man of the Mountain lost his face - literally - the day after Bush pulled his pilot-with-a-codpiece stunt on the aircraft carrier last May "Mission Accomplished."

Great one, SpiralHawk, I'll have to note that one down. Though I have to say, it does admit of other interpretations. Shame on the whole nation, f'r one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. In order to accomplish any of this
you will have to expose the grip the religious right has on the Republican party. The Theonomic Reconstructionists have taken over and its not pretty.

War on Secular Society

"We need to find ways to win the war" Karl Rove, President Bush's political director told a gathering of the Family Research Council in March 2002. The Family Research Council is one of the most powerful lobbying organizations of the Religious Right today. Rove wasn't talking about the war on terrorism. He was talking about the war on secular society.

To understand the war on secular society, we should go to Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition. He explained the nature of the war on secularism in 1991 at a Christian Coalition rally. Robertson claimed:

"It's going to be a spiritual battle. There will be Satanic forces... We are not going to be coming up just against human beings, to beat them in elections. We're going to be coming up against spiritual warefare."

The Republican Party has been the key vehicle in the drive for control. Now that the Religious Right dominates both houses of Congress and the presidency, they are highly focused on the one remaining branch of government: the courts.

"Judges are the basis of the land's righteousness, " said David Barton, a "Christian nation" activist and vice chair of the Texas state GOP. Barton is dedicated to ending the separation of church and state.

http://www.theocracywatch.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Please send this along to John Buchanan
with words of support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. All I can say is God speed
and good luck, if he pulls it off... I will be very amazed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC