Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have we ever been below "yellow alert" since 9/11...?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:13 PM
Original message
Have we ever been below "yellow alert" since 9/11...?
or since the alert system was created? I noticed that Ridge wished to remind us that "yellow" was still elevated. We still have to be on guard. He did say that they would not raise it to orange again unless the threat was more defined...They would not use the same parameters as in the past to raise the level. One wonders how much of this decision is political?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO... and I am positive of this...
Nor will we in any time period that I can imagine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which do you think America will see first:
Code Green, or Code Red?

I think, so long as there's a Bush in the White House, there will never be a Code Green. And to keep a Bush in the White House, there may need be a Code Red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Code red will be closer to election time
and the October surprise may well be another terrorist attack. There will be an October surprise. Of this I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Don't We Have To Be Under Attack For Code Red?
I don't remember for sure, so i'm just asking. But, i thought that it wouldn't go to red unless we were actually being hit. Of course, since you're predicting an attack, that would go hand and hand.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I can just see it now - Terrorists NUKE Atlantic City
footage all over the "news" channels, blasting out the videos of the carnage, for all to tremble over.

People told to keep the lines clear, don't want to swamp the system, causing problems for the heroic rescuers and front-liners.

Total communications blackout of AC due to nukular blast.

Of course, Atlantic City casinos blissfully unaware that anything is going on. See, none of it actually happened, just that "liberal media" complying with orders from DC. People not realizing that the footage was from the Armageddon DVD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's always political...
Right after the information that Bush knew about 9/11 in advance broke, and several newspapers blared the headlines "BUSH KNEW", the White House raised the alert level to Tang(tm).
A WH offical, or was it an aide, even admitted that they raised it to take attention off the whole "BUSH KNEW" thing.
They'll probably raise it back to Tang(tm) in early October, and then raise it to Kool Aid(tm) sometime before the General Election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. My argument against the coding system is this
with their "little alerts" and their incredibly vague threats, this just gives the rethugs a chance to pat themselves on the back for the APPEARANCE of being strong on terror and defense. As long as they are scaring people, people think it is under control. Contrast that with Clinton, who WAS fighting the war on terror, successfully I might add. He did it behind the scenes and I am sure there was alot of success that went unnoticed. So next time I hear about the color code and the notion that dems are soft on terror, my response is the difference between appearance and results. There was one US (state side) terror attack under Clinton and that guy was executed. Maybe someone can refesh my memory as to what happened to the guys who attacked the navy boat. Weren't they caught to? Anyway, using fear to show you are strong on terror, doesn't mean you are strong on terror. Did I make my point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Code Red situation might be interesting - Red means "DON'T LEAVE
YOUR HOME!" (likely). Also likely to happen around 11/2.

Would be interesting to see the contrast of the freepers who believe everything that this misAdministration says and the ones who got the memo saying "just kidding, please sneak out and vote for Bush - and don't forget your double-secret freeper ID badge so we know you're one of us!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShimokitaJer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Whatever happened to the "Defcon" system?
Has anyone checked whether or not the "heightened" security colors have any relation at all to these level of preparedness (formerly?) used internally by the military?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC