Unperson 309
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:24 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Which City Would They Nuke? |
|
OK, say the bad guys (whoever!) Did go "Noo-kyoo-lar" on our collective asses. Which city would they hit? What do you think the outcome would be?
|
donco6
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
maveric
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I picked San Francisco. Boston and NY |
|
are also candidates. Seattle too. Any bastion of liberalism because the nukes will probably be dropped or allowed to be dropped by the bu$h reich. It aint gonna be Tulsa, Dallas or SLC.
|
libhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. I voted other, because - |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 08:24 PM by tx.lib
L.A. and San Fran are two distinct choices, and I think it could be either - or, but definately West Coast. I agree that the Bushites will probably be behind whatever happens, therefore I think to hit New York again would be a dead give away. Hit the West Coast, kill somebody different this time, to keep the sheeple guessing.
|
ChompySnack
(612 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Boston, during the Democratic convention |
|
We all know who's side the terrorists are on. Just look at the Anthrax mailer.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
4. NYC...it's still the biggest target. |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 07:32 PM by MercutioATC
Plus, it'd show that, even though we'd been hit once, we still couldn't defend the same target.
|
PragMantisT
(893 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If they do their homework, they know what a busy port it is. And there are some very strategic pipelines running through the area.
It's a lot of area to keep secure.
|
MikeG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Cleveland. I think they're Steeler fans. |
jtb33
(490 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It will be a smaller city in the midwest - something unexpected - that will show that they can reach anywhere. It will have more influence on the economy if they strike "Anywhereville".
|
The empressof all
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I am here and it would be just my luck---But they would take out Boeing, Microsoft, Nuclear Sub base, major port and the home of Starbucks.
|
Kathy in Cambridge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Boston or NY-more bang for the buck |
|
highest population densities in the country-and lots of financial institutions.
|
Steven_S
(810 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
10. New York, New York... |
|
So nice, they attacked it twice.
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-02-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Motor city, tank plants, thousands of aerospace companies...and on and on.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |