vivalarev
(503 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 06:29 PM
Original message |
Real-Time Aerial Photographs |
|
Does anyone know of any sites on the internet where you can search an address and get a real-time aerial photo for that location? I need a photo of a construction sit for work and have had no luck finding a site that can do this.
I know they used to exist on basic map sites, but they are no longer there as an option, probably a national security issue.
Anyway, any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
Don_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
vivalarev
(503 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. thanks for the suggestion |
|
but i need something that is either real-time, or taken after february 2004
|
Working Class Hero
(85 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
Darkseid69
(285 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. wow i can see my mom's house |
|
She's right they haven't finished the fence yet.
|
ThoughtCriminal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There are companies that use small (relatively) radio-control or teathered blimps to provide real-time aerial video. Not sure what kind of rates they charge.
Except for scattered webcams that are in tall buildings or other vistas, I don't know of any sites that provide a real-time service like this.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Why do you need real-time? |
|
Do you mean daily or hourly? Real-time means continuously ON.
Are you monitoring something?
|
Wcross
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-16-04 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Rent a plane&pilot-bring your digital camera. |
|
_Probably wouldn't cost over 2 or 3 hundred bucks.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message |