Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:31 PM
Original message |
Pompous, Pretentious or Pedantic. |
|
If you're going to reply, you've got to reply in one of those three styles.
It's a beautiful day for a walk.
|
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I am above posting to this thread. |
|
I will not dignify it with my presence.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
dolo amber
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. I despair at your lack of manners, SLB |
|
Pointing out ones obvious yet inconsequential mistake in a public arena is so very vulgar and boorish...*tsk*
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. I would never stoop so low. Never. |
|
Even though I know so much on the subject. So much!
|
Magrittes Pipe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. He learned it from you, D. |
|
He learned it by watching you!
|
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. I'll have no more of your lies, knave! |
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. Avast, Sirrah! Ye pompy brute! |
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
2. To stroll down the boulevard on such a fine day is sublime. |
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Actually, it's not a boulevard |
|
Boulevards, according to Webster's, are broad and tree-lined. This is neither.
|
Magrittes Pipe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oooh, Screaming Lord Byron... |
|
...I just can't get enough of your silky hair and your come-hither eyes. How old did you say you were again? No, I don't believe that for a second. You just look far too soft and pretty. Do you want a back rub?
You did say "pederastic," right?
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. No, and very soon someone will be saying 'probationary sentence' |
kimchi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Indeed, it is a beautiful day to walk around |
|
my estate! So absorbed was I in the beauty that I didn't even think to question the gardner washing his Mercedes when he should be working!
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Actually posting in this thread will not necessarily exhibit the styles |
|
you've chosen. The forum doesn't provide a wide enough scope to cover your topics thoroughly. The best way to do this would be to offer some rules and conditions with which to proceed, such as pararaphs of equal word length deliniating the different aspects said styles represent. Thus a true "compare and contrast" setting will be manifest.
|
Magrittes Pipe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Only *you* would say something like that. |
|
One would think you would have grown up by now.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Actually the correct use of the asterisk is for the purposes of citing, as |
|
a bibliography. Apostrophes would better serve the function you seek to employ.
|
Magrittes Pipe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. Perhaps, were I not speaking an Indo-European language. |
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. A virtuoso performance, maestro. Bravo! |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Actually that is the correct response for a musical performance not for |
|
a critique of the venue for vetting the differences between these different styles of asshol-ity. The correct exultation would be "well said" or "succinct and correct, sir"
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I should not dignify this thread with a response. |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
19. Actually the thread inherently is void of dignity as it is merely a string |
|
of 1's and 0's pieced together in a way which represents the keystrokes generated by the posters therein. The dignity lies with the thread originator - or the lack of said dignity, respective to your personal tastes.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Perhaps you do not have the wit to see my immaculate design? |
|
So difficult for one's social inferiors to accomodate the designs of genius.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. actually I imply no judgement with my instructions on the appllication of |
|
correct usage of the English language to discribe the thoughts and ideas of the posters to your thread. Your attempt to emotionally belittle me is a futile one in that I, as a sentient and thorough mind, cannot be brushed aside with a display of childlike braggadochio.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Then this uncalled-for imbroglio has reached a veritable impasse. |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. Actually you are correct. |
slappypan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
22. I suppose this thread is acceptable. |
|
A bit naive in its execution, but not bad, really, for the work of an amateur.
(Oh, wait. That's "condescending." Sorry.)
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. The dart has flown close enough to the veritable bullseye. |
|
Your commentary is passable.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
27. Actually, when one takes into account the post count of the originator |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-26-04 01:57 PM by ChavezSpeakstheTruth
of the thread in question one can surmise, correctly, that this thread is, in fact, the work of a long-time thread originator. One can also conclude, once again quite correctly, that it is the work of a man who has not left the confines of his homeor office for quite some span of time.
edit - rare spelling error
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. My vocation is less than taxing, therefore I sharpen my intellectual |
|
abilities in this unruly bearpit.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. The same situation applies to myself. |
|
I find my myriad talents and expansive warehouse of trivial information is squandered in the employ of the company in which I am employed.
|
slappypan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
32. Yes, I suppose it might seem that way |
|
to someone with a superficial understanding of the subject.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
35. Actually a very slight understanding of the subject is required as access |
|
to the thread originator's profile is readily available to even the lurking troll.
|
Swede
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
jobycom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Define beautiful. nt. |
TrogL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Technically, it's not day |
|
...at least over 50% of the planet or even longer for those considering "day" to contain "daylight" such as denizens of the South Pole, which is probably in total darkness 24/7 right at the moment.
You do not "got" to reply in any form. A more proper usage would be "you should reply in one of these styles" and list the styles in the context of the post so that if the subject has scrolled beyond the top of the page, they are still visible.
"a walk" is passive and considered bad form. "walking" would be best, as "to be walking" is also passive.
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
36. Your riposte raises some perplexing conceits. |
|
I shall ponder with great interest your contributions to this modest dialogue.
|
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
38. Actually-the correct form would be "you must reply in one of these styles" |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-26-04 02:12 PM by ChavezSpeakstheTruth
as the originator of the thread meant to exclude those who chose not to do so from participation therein.
edit: rare typographical error
|
TrogL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
34. What would you know about... |
|
beauty or walking. You hardly qualify.
(I'm trying for pompous, but probably accomplishing arrogant - hardly a new accusation).
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
37. My perambulatory achievements are legend! |
|
My knowledge of pulchritude and comeliness equally renowned.
|
TrogL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
42. Incoherent, inscrutible or irrascible |
|
actually, that's worth its own thread
|
Screaming Lord Byron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
43. Yes! Toss it into the literadelic smorgasbord that some call The Lounge! |
Donkeyboy75
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
39. The fruit called 'orange' is so named because it is the color orange. |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
41. The fruit called orange is, in fact part of the larger citrus family, many |
|
subsets which are quite similar in makeup. The tangerani, mandarine orange and blood orange are examples of said subsets
|
Donkeyboy75
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Well, the fun can now begin now that I am posting in this forum. |
|
But, my skills are such that nobody can guess which of the three Ps I use as my posting vehicle. I am quite clever.
|
TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-26-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
44. Yes, I am all three, and it's because I am genuinely better than you. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |