Fuck THIS!

[Deja Q]

I'm sorry, but that use of the word "fuck" seems derogatory against women.

Need I explain the particular nuances of my assertion? :shrug:

[soothsayer]

1. I really don't see it that way (and I'm a woman)

Like "suck this," it can be directed at either sex, no?

[boobooday]

2. I tend to agree -- there is an overemphasis

On making the recipient of the act represent some kind of loser . . . is that what it is?

And then of course they talk about the "feminization" of America, as if there is nothing worse than feminine qualities, as if feminine qualities will be the destruction of the universe.

And then we have Arnold, calling people "girlie men" and saying it means "they can't make tough decisions."

It is all misogyny to me . . .

http://www.wgoeshome.com

[EstimatedProphet]

3. Don't see it

"Feminization" as a bad thing is sexist, yes.
"Girlie-man" is definately sexist, yes.
"Fuck" as directed at the RECIPIENT...aren't both partners the recipient if it's done right? Unless it's dark and you miss...

[rbnyc]

5. Yeah, I don't get it either. (nt)

[JVS]

4. Fuck that shit!

I don't give a flying fuck.

If this fucking bullshit continues the only fucking topic in this fucking lounge is going to be people's fucking cats.

So I'll fucking say the fucking word fuck as fucking much as I fucking please.

on edit: one of my fucks was a funk. FUCK!

[CanuckAmok]

6. Pabst Blue Ribbon!

[JVS]

7. So, I've had 9 of them so far today, what's your fucking point?

:-)

[CanuckAmok]

8. MOMMY!

The candy-coated man they call the sandman...the CANDY-COATED MAN THEY CALL THE SANDMAN!!!!!

[JVS]

9. If you don't start posting coherently, I'll punch your fucking face in!

[Dookus]

10. fuck that

ya big fucking fuck. What're you, Amish?

[JVS]

12. Fuck no! Bunch of no goodnik coke-smuggling, horse-fucking buggy jockeys!

[CanuckAmok]

11. Oh, I'm coherent alright, coherent like a platypus!

[JVS]

13. I am so close to putting you on ignore!

:-)

[EstimatedProphet]

14. Dude, this is fucked up

-Kyle

[jukes]

15. on the surface, that's true

freeper male-dominant types probably do see it that way (DAMN you, arwalden, haven't been able to abbreviate "probably" since your post in the grammar nazi thread!)

more enlightened liberals don't see it in such an invasive sense: women can "fuck" men, for example.

a more succinct & invasive term wd, perhaps, be "rape you", or "rape this"; but even that is not as sexist as it seems. male>male rape certainly occurs more often than is acknowledged since it goes unreported. this is definitely a crime that more frequently victimizes woman, though, & as such, i'd find the term more offensive.

[JVS]

16. May I suggest fist

It adds that spice of violence

;-)