Arbustosux
(769 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-13-03 01:23 PM
Original message |
|
Thats how Tony Blakely described Bush and the credibility gap with respect to WMD! This happened just moments ago on the McLaughlin Group. Could this fat ass get his nose any further up the WH administration's butt?
On a better note, the panel seemed to be insinuating that Condi Rice needs to be closely looked at for her role in the SOTU. When will Powell and Rice realize that they are token ballast to be jettisoned as needed?
|
FlashHarry
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-13-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Although Fat Tony may be on to something about the "other" Africa urianum claims. I haven't heard about this, has anyone else? The Niger claim has long been proven false, but he asserts that the Brits have evidence of such claims from two other African nations. If this is true (and I doubt it), it might explain why Blair is so quixotically sticking to his story.
|
dfong63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-13-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. "and this time, we used better forgers" |
|
sure, blair went public with the weak evidence and kept the strong evidence under wraps. now of course he can't release the strong evidence, because it's too secret/sensitive. so we just have to take his word for it. because he's just such an honest and charming guy. even though to date all of his vaunted evidence has turned out to be "dodgy". he still expects us to "trust him".
in your dreams, tony.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |