Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:30 PM
Original message |
Poll question: OK... the Peterson verdict poll |
|
yeah yeah, nobody cares. But everybody talks about it.
This poll is NOT if you think he's guilty - it's what you predict the verdict will be.
|
HalfManHalfBiscuit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Think he did it, but will get not guilty |
|
Deliberation was just too short.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Not guilty by reason of who gives a shit. |
|
Usually when no one gives a shit, the guy gets off so the talk shows can keep spinning about it for another six months to a year.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I believe that has legal precedent. You win, BurtWorm. LOLOL
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
they will try and try him again.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
the jury has reached a verdict -coming soon.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. ok, they actually got a verdict |
|
then I say, "Guilty" I think they will find him guilty.
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. i know the tv teLLs me he's guiLty |
|
but evidence wise - not guiLty
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I didn't expect all the not-guilties.
Why do so many think so?
|
Pithlet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
21. I don't know that he's not guilty |
|
I just think there wasn't enough to convict legally, based on what I've seen. Of course none of us has seen all the evidence that the two members of the jury that haven't been stricken have seen. Seriously, this was the weirdest high profile case.
|
plcdude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I can beyond a reasonable doubt declare him innocent but I think there is enough reasonable doubt to receive a not guilty verdict.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
except for the so-called Lacey and Conner Bill which in my opinion is a stealth attack on Roe v Wade.
|
SemiCharmedQuark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Not even a stealth attack, just an attack. |
|
They're playing the outrage to try and open up the Supreme court ruling.
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Either way Dean Cain gets to keep working |
|
Oh that's right he has a TV series now.....well he can always use this in negotiations.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Seems like the Jury came back pretty quick |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
I did, too. I thought they'd be hung or take a very very long time.
Of course, I knew the OJ verdict would be not guilty because of the short deliberation - I just felt everybody sat down and said "did they prove it? No. Let's get lunch."
|
mosin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
It's quick for the two replacement jurors. Not so quick for the other ten. It's hard to say how much they really start deliberations over when told to.
|
DenverDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 03:39 PM by Dookus
I was called twice for jury duty in the very courthouse he's in. I lived in San Mateo County for 10 years.
|
DenverDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
24. It's just bullshit this crap was used to obscure election issues. |
|
Keep the sheeple's eyes off the real problems. I hope this fuck fries, not for whacking his wife, but for helping the fascist corporate media (s)elect a monster.
|
edbermac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Well I care to see JUSTICE done... |
|
I certainly do not care for all the cable news 24/7 hype...
|
MrModerate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I couldn't care less?
Seriously -- I overdosed on the Case of The Century during the LAST century. And since they have a new Case of The Century about every 6 months, the whole thing gets real pointless real fast.
If he did it -- what a slimeball, lock 'im up forever. If he didn't -- what a slimeball, despise 'im forever.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
From what I've seen, there is not enough evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Granted, I am not on the jury so there might be a ton of evidence linking him to the crime.
|
Pithlet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Anyone else having OJ verdict flashbacks? |
|
I don't think this is nearly on the same level publicity wise. I don't think we'll ever see anything like that again. But, sitting here watching CNN feels a lot like that day.
|
Pithlet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
Lone_Wolf_Moderate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Not to kill your poll, but the verdict is in. |
|
He's guilty, and you're right, nobody cares.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message |