Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawmaker doesn't want novels with gay characters in public libraries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:31 AM
Original message
Lawmaker doesn't want novels with gay characters in public libraries
:eyes:

<snip>

MONTGOMERY - An Alabama lawmaker who sought to ban gay marriages now wants to ban novels with gay characters from public libraries, including university libraries.

A bill by Rep. Gerald Allen, R-Cottondale, would prohibit the use of public funds for "the purchase of textbooks or library materials that recognize or promote homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle." Allen said he filed the bill to protect children from the "homosexual agenda."

"Our culture, how we know it today, is under attack from every angle," Allen said in a press conference Tuesday.

Allen said that if his bill passes, novels with gay protagonists and college textbooks that suggest homosexuality is natural would have to be removed from library shelves and destroyed.

"I guess we dig a big hole and dump them in and bury them," he said.

A spokesman for the Montgomery-based Southern Poverty Law Center called the bill censorship.

"It sounds like Nazi book burning to me," said SPLC spokesman Mark Potok.

Allen pre-filed his bill in advance of the 2005 legislative session, which begins Feb. 1.

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/1101896768316400.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. That makes me want to donate ...
a copy of Lynn Cheney's novel to my local library.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. LoL!
this guy is trying so hard to keep that closet door of his shut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not to quibble
but this sounds like book burying rather than book burning, however, the endpoint is dangerous censorship which is, as a matter of fact, almost always a dangerous facet of fascism. Like the fascism that is now roaring across our once great land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe he should be sent on a Civic Visit here ...
... to Newcastle upon Tyne where the Central Public Library has a specialised Gay & Lesbian section. As, of course, has the largest bookstore.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wonder if they are going to end up banning the work of gay scientists, too
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 10:42 AM by htuttle
on edit:

And you know, I'm DAMNED TIRED of having to change everything because SOME Republican fundies have poor impulse control.

Just because gays exist, doesn't mean you HAVE to have gay sex! Keep it in your pants unless you're comfortable with it, boys... We shouldn't be forced to 'fundie-proof' the world for them!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Great! NO COMPUTERS!
Alan Turing (1912-1954)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Absolutely!
Now, how are we going to decide if a character is gay? Can't be too careful, you know. Sure, there are books where a character is identified right on the page as being of a homosexual persuasion, but there are a lot of books where it's kind of ambiguous. Take that David fella in the Bible. There are a lot of suspicious-looking passages about him and his friendship with Jonathan. And that Jesus guy? The one who, at the last supper, sat with the head of his beloved disciple on his chest? Looks like there might have been a little swish in the sandals there!

Better safe than sorry, says I. Toss that Bible in the hole, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. There is a lot of sex in the Bible too. I wonder if he will have it
banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bertha Venation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. If the story of David and Jonathan were published today in a different
context, this asshole would include it in his "righteous" ban.

Jesus Christ, people. Live and let live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have to admit that he is right
"Our culture, how we know it today, is under attack from every angle,"

FROM THEM!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is what happens when people vote republican.
This situation also provides an excellent illustration of the differences in the political strategies and tactics of the two major parties.

A few democrats may mention this briefly if at all and paint Allen as an isolated and extreme politician who only happens to be a republican. No connection to the republican party will be drawn or emphasized despite the fact that this story easily could be about many powerful republicans. The story will have a life measured in hours.

If a democrat had done something like this, republican talking points would go out to the entire country with instructions to describe the offending democrat as the typical democrat doing what democrats always do. Every democrat appearing on TV in the next several days would be forced to comment on the matter rather than staying on whatever message the democrat had intended to focus on. Within a matter of days republicans would have convinced tens of millions of people that every democrat has a firm policy of censoring books they disagree with. This false impression would be reinforced by the republican party for years.

All democrats, including politicians, pundits and every day people, need to point out this is what happens when people vote republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. "If we get rid of 'gay' books, all gays will immediately turn straight"
Nothing better in the morning than to get a glimpse of the simple mind of a homophobic asshole.

No wonder they voted for Bush. They are as stupid as the ignorant moron they've elected. The bad thing is that those idiots make us all the laughingstock of the entire world. How utterly embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well...*I* don't want ignorant intolerant lawmakers in legislatures
Looks like we got us a standoff here, boys...:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Our culture, how we know it today, is under attack from every angle,"
I guess everybody has got to be right at least part of the time.

Idiots. I was hoping we have moved past the stage of book burning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Especially the "Fundy Angle"...
Damn beards itch and I think I'd look stupid in those baggy pants...
And my girlfriend don't do Burkhas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. What about gay authors?
So does that mean they're going to get rid of books by Oscar Wilde and countless other brilliant writers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. oh, sure
don't you think Oscar Wilde shold be first on the list of banned gay authors? I mean you can't really get any more obvious than that. luckily, this idiot probably hasn't actually read any of these 'gay' books, so we're off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. The Homosexual Agenda..
"if you ain't gay, you cannot stay!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. ... to protect children from the "homosexual agenda"...
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 10:51 AM by mac56
My God!!! Think of the children, people!!!

/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LDS Jock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. What about gay TV?
Will "Will And Grace" be banned off cable? Ellen DeGeneres show be off the morning talk show schedule? Gays must be totally banished to save society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Sheppard Smith off Fox
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LDS Jock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. and Anderson Cooper too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
17. this would ban Proust
This would ban "Remembrance of Things Past" (the usual English translation of the title), perhaps the greatest novel of all time.

Can you imagine a university library unable to carry this book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. No more Moby Dick. No more Leaves of Grass. No more Plato.
None of these:


http://gaytoday.badpuppy.com/garchive/reviews/080398re.htm

1 Ulysses by James Joyce (minor gay character)

4 Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov (minor lesbian and gay characters)

12 The Way of All Flesh by Samuel Butler (minor gay character)

15 To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf 15 (minor lesbian character)

17 The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter by Carson McCuller (minor gay character)

21 Henderson the Rain King by Saul Bellow (minor gay character)

23 U.S.A. Trilogy by John Dos Passos (minor gay character)

24 Winesburg, Ohio by Sherwood Anderson (minor gay character)

28 Tender is the Night by F. Scott Fitzgerald (minor gay and lesbian characters)

38 Howard's End by E. M. Forster (latent lesbian character)

42 Deliverance by James Dickey (minor gay character)

43 Dance to the Music of Time by Anthony Powell (minor lesbian and gay)

44 Point Counter Point by Aldous Huxley (latent lesbian character)

48 The Rainbow by D. H. Lawrence (minor lesbian and gay characters)

49 Women in Love by D. H. Lawrence (major gay character)

50 Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller (minor lesbian character)

51 The Naked and the Dead by Norman Mailer (minor gay character)

53 Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabokov (minor gay character)

62 From Here to Eternity by James Jones (minor gay character)

63 The Wapshot Chronicles by John Cheever (minor gay character)

64 The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger (minor gay character)

70 The Alexandria Quartet by Lawrence Durell (major lesbian and gay)

80 Brideshead Revisited by Evelyn Waugh (minor gay character)

81 The Adventures of Augie March by Saul Bellow (minor gay character)

Also worth mentioning (in my opinion) are I, Claudius by Robert Graves (# 14); On the Road by Jack Kerouac (# 55); and The Sheltering Sky by Paul Bowles (# 97).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Rep. Gerald Allen sez...
Plato? Ain't that Mickey Mouse's dog? Sure din't know he wez gay!!!

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. And?
You think the nutjobs would regard that as a bad thing? Take Lolita, for example: to you and me it may be an excellent book, possibly one of the top 100 in 20th century American literature, but to the book-burners it's just smut. Or (worse!) it makes you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Yeah, but what about Plato?
Of course, Plato was a godless heathen. Never mind. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. Throw out the Bible, then.
David and Jonathan? Gay.

Gay.

Guh-hay-hay!

*snap snap snap*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. and how bout that Sampson?
all here cared about was his hair, if that don't qualify him for a spot on Queer Eye, I don't know what does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. so "mandate" mags wiLL be puLLed?
noooooooooooooo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. Here's a good rebuttal
"Our constitution, as we know it today and it has been for more than 200 years, is under attack from every angle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HalfManHalfBiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. Good - No More Batman
That damn Robin was forcing me to have unclean thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. They're NOT FASCISTS I Tell You!
So stop saying that and comparing these fucking pigs to Nazi's!! They haven't murdered 6 million jews yet so Nazi comparisons are crazy!!! After they murder 6 million jews THEN we can call them Nazis!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. No, not six million Jews
only about 100,000 Iraqis. Well on their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. What were the Nazis before the Holocaust?
Fascism predates the Holocaust, you know. The Doctrine of Fascism was published in Italy in 1932, and the first volume of Mein Kampf was published in 1925. The Nazis were a force to be reckoned with in Germany from 1930. Do you think European fascists were all pussycats before WW2?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Head, Meet Sarcasm
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 01:54 PM by Beetwasher
Yes, I know, I was being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Sigh
Shoulda known that. The similarity to Bob Boudelang gives the game away.:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bye Bye Virginia Woolf and Gertrude Stein
Apparently, you're only welcome in France now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. Why stop there?
What about banning books that have non christian characters or communists? What about other "anti-family" issues like divorce, adultery, single parents and deliberate childlessness? What about working mothers - that can't be a good influence on the children right?

And why are we only banning fictional works? What about historical figures that were gay? If kids know that you can be gay AND accomplished, what kind of can of worms are we opening there?

And obviously, as stated above, the bible is unsuitable and even dangerous in the wrong hands. We must return to the days when access to religious texts were strictly controlled by an educated elite who can "interpret" them for the common people. Ban all English versions - Latin only from now on.

/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Well, so much for Lynne Cheney's novel being in that library system!
Hopefully, "Lady Chatterly's Lover" will still be available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsAnthropy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. I didn't know they HAD books in Alabama
will wonders never cease?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Of course they do!
And they have crayons for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. And yet they seem to believe
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 02:18 PM by Bouncy Ball
that liberals want to ban the Bible.

What exactly are these people so terrified of? Society is not under attack from the GLBT community, but it sure makes for good rhetoric, doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC