Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

History - has it ever been 'acceptable' for a woman to be promiscuous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:10 PM
Original message
History - has it ever been 'acceptable' for a woman to be promiscuous
I have a strange question here. This came up in passing in another thread on another board (not DU) and I thought I would come here as we have a lot of people here that are a lot smarter and more knowledgeable than me, as it got me thinking. (If you are wondering, I had started a thread on an RPG board...)

But, has there ever been a time in history where it has been socially acceptable for a female to be sexually promiscuous? I am not talking about isolated cases like Madonna from the 80s or early 90s, but just in a society in general. I think there are examples in nature, including some where the female is promiscuous and the male is not.

I know in history it has often been acceptable for men to be sexually promiscuous, but I could not think of any examples of the reverse.

Are there any examples of it being socially acceptable for a woman to be sexually promiscuous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anthropologists would argue it is natural for men to be promiscuous
I am not an anthropologist so I have no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. it was acceptable during the day of early person
women screwed with anyone and everyone just to keep the species going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. There have been cultures - Eskimos where women had more
than one husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. good example
But, could men have more than 1 wife?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Ah yes, I remember now. Eskimos were scandalous.
They would go at it at the drop of a hat. Europeans were aghast, at the time of the first contacts. Went right to work christianizing them and put a stop to all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopTheMorans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. i find it socially acceptable now; can't be having double standards
is that good enough? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. in some circles it may be
But, I think even outside the fundamentalist churches, it is still generally not acceptable in America for a woman to 'sleep around'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know but I wish I could live in a place like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Try Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.
Sexual promiscuity wasn't merely acceptable, it was pretty much required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's the other extreme
How about we just let people be who they are and quit judging everyone based on what we think they should be doing with a willing partner? Is that so much to ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. not at all
It's not too much to ask at all, and that is how it should be. But, we're talking real life & history here.

It wasn't that long ago that women were expected to be purer than Ivory Soap on their wedding days, while it was acceptable for men to have had "experience"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. really
what do you say girl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. In film or the theater, and what would the bible be w/o Mary Magdalen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. always acceptable in the bed of the man she is with at the time......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL
So true, so true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebinTx Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually, I think women over the age of 25 SHOULD be promiscuous.
Treat those men as sex toys and throw their asses out the next a.m. while promising to call them and then don't.

By the age of 30, women will have gotten it out of their system and will be ready to marry and have kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. oh, if that were true
Actually, if women over 18 would be that way... I'm sure our society would be a lot less uptight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Ah, the 70's
Sorry you gals missed it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thank G-d...
i've been waiting for a thread like this to spill the beans on my longterm personal relationships with several generations of Bush women....

they make me get on my knees and howl.

aroooooo

whalerdier55
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red State Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Now - Amsterdam? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cleopatra? Mae West? Angie Dickinson? Bea Arthur?
Just to name a few
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. those are individuals
Like Madonna from the past 20 years, who gained notoriety from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh
Edited on Wed Dec-01-04 04:29 PM by underpants
Well Howard Zinn documents that in many maternal Native American societies the woman could kick their husband (yes they did divorce) out if they found someone else or were tired of his crap. I don't know if that is necessarily "promiscuous" though.

Now that I read the original post-Are you saying that you don't feel that anyone on DU is smarter than you?

:bounce: Just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. nope, too many here are smarter than me
that why I come here - to learn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. It did help Catherine the Great rise in power as the Tsar of Russia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yup.
There's a modern tribe(s?) of aboriginals where the woman are expected to be promiscuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. History says 20% of all humans via the wrong "pair" via women.
Seems those groups that try to have one male in control of many females and their kids - such as lions - end up with about 40% of the kids sired by someone other than the boss male.

Sort of explains the single males hanging around the boss male lion - and the boss male lion killing a kid now and then.

But in Humans the Twin study indicated only a 20% level - and my medical friends say that is a good rough guess as to the number of kids not related to their "father".

But you asked if it was ever socially acceptable for a woman to be sexually promiscuous - I would guess that as long as males made the rules and the game was to pass along your DNA to the next generation the answer would be NO!

peace

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ancient Greece.
It was expected for married women to take multiple lovers. I did my honors thesis on this in college. It wasn't until Christianity that the real severe patriarchy got into power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the Princess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. I would argue
It's natural for men and women to be promiscuous. It's unnatural to be married to one person forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Most of the Polynesian cultures
not only allowed but encouraged sexual experimentation for both genders until marriage. Advent of christianity ended that.

Ancient Rome had the temple prostitutes who were highly respected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. I would imagine that the problem is so
few cultures where women were the ones with the power. Men have controlled women by controlling their sexuality.

Can't think of one, but I would guess it would have to be a culture where the women were the rulers, where society was matriarchal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdx_prog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. It should be mandatory....
Nothing like a good cigar and a trashy woman...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. Did you miss the sixties?
It wasn't promiscuous when we did it.

It was sharing the wealth.

And it was glorious....................

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC