Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's a non-gender-specific synonym for "human"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:42 PM
Original message
What's a non-gender-specific synonym for "human"?
Hu=person? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. earthling
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 04:46 PM by Cush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Homo Sapiens (Latin) but I doubt the wisdom (pun).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. "Homo sap - the ape that walks like a chicken."
That's from something or other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. hominid
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogradda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. just person.
or people i would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. person is not gender specific.
son is male. How about huperchild?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Oh crap
I missed the "son" part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Mankind...
Oh wait...:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robroy Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Featherless Bi-Ped
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrainRants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does "Homo Sapiens" count?
or is homo a gender term?

(not meant as an insulting question, only seeking context)

My apologies in advance if it offends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I say don't worry about it
Butchering the English language isn't going to suddenly bring about gender equality. Human is a perfectly good word. Go ahead and use it.
The point is to be precise in one's use of language. When writing about deaths of American soldiers in Iraq, one should say men and women because it is accurate. There are cases, however, where that is not descriptive. In graduate school, I knew a Native American student who was asked to look over a high school textbook, because the publisher imagined they were making it more inclusive. They had simply substituted person for male nouns throughout the book: cowboy became cowperson, and other meaningless changes. They had not bothered to rewrite the book to incorporate developments in social history and women's history in particular.
The point I'm emphasizing here is that focusing on language alone is meaningless and can actually obfuscate social inequality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baba Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Language is important.
You have some good points. But I think that language is much more powerful than we might think. By using inclusive language we are having an effect on social inequality.

One thing that drives me nuts: when people use the word "girl" to refer to a woman over the age of 18. I think it is fine as long as you are using it in an informal way, and you are talking about adult men as "boys." But how many times have I heard people use "men" and "girls" to refer to adults of similar age in the same conversation? It infuriates me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Oh I'm with you there!
I despise it when people use the term "girl." Language is important, but it's not a substitute for changes in policy or analysis. I think we in this country have a tendency to concentrate on language to the exclusion of substance. My first recollection of this was as a teenager, when James Watt resigned as Interior secretary over his racist joke. His comments were horrible, but the Reagan administration was able to implement racist and environmentally rapacious policies without reproach. That was even worse than Watt's comments about the coal commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. DU should make up a good name
the wingnuts make up words and change them all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eyeball Kid Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ugly sacks of mostly water.
Hairless ape.

Meatbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. We need to reassert the original meaning of "man"
Man is from the old German word Mann, which simply meant "human".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. ummm Mann also means husband...
I don't think there's an easy way around this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No, not originally.
When Mann came into English, there were three words used to desribe people. Mann was the equivalent of Human, Wer was the equivalent of Male Human, and Wif was the equivalent of female human. Up until very recently, Man was the general reference word for all of humanity. We need to push that meaning back out, rather than rework the rest of the language to avoid it.

Wer is completly dead to the language, so it can't be brought back, but "male", "guy" or any number of other words could suffice. (Wif, the old english word for female, survives today in the word Wife).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. "Wer" not completely dead, but its use in "werewolf" not helpful, either
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 05:20 PM by Inland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Terran
Something we'll no doubt use a lot in the near future. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Humyn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Tellurian
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Tellurian, humanoid, critter, cretin, junk monkey, animals with money...
quite a few, and many of which need not be extracted from the 5th volume of "The Sci-Fi Encyclopedia". :D :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. I like Leary and RAW's term -- Domesticated Primates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. earth lice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC