Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: US children still traumatized by Janet Jackson's breast exposure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:02 PM
Original message
Report: US children still traumatized by Janet Jackson's breast exposure
<snip>
According to the 500-page report filed by the FCC, more than 90 percent of the children who saw the exposed breast said they were "confused and afraid."

"Mommy has dirty chest bumps," said a 5-year-old boy quoted in one of the thousands of case studies compiled by the FCC. "She's like the bad lady on TV. I'm afraid Mommy will take off her shirt and scare everyone. I hate Mommy."
<snip>

Snort.

From The Onion, of course...
http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4104
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. RIGHT!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's THE ONION...a satire. Have a nice day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've been needing to diet and exercise more
So I have dirty chest bumps now. Am I going to scare children and those with heart conditions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goddess Nephthis Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Hey!
I BOUGHT my "dirty chest bumps!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Do you want mine?
I swear I'm not using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. LMAO
"Bhomik is one of millions of people facing every parent's worst nightmare: that their child will see a partially exposed breast."

and

"Wasserbaum added that children who saw the televised breast in Europe, Australia, and various other nations throughout the world were somehow unaffected by the sight."


On a more serious note, there are a lot of people in this country who I really have a hard time understanding. The mock rape, etc., onstage was fine, but 1.5 seconds of actual breast is SO offensive? Geez....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. EXACTLY! Thank-you!!
an exposed breast was not nearly as offensive as the mannerin which it was exposed... the guy's mock aggro attitude, and Janet's fake shock and horror, sent a far worse signal, IMO, than the actual exposure of flesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. The only children traumatized are the ones who
now realize "what those things were REALLY for, " and understand that they have been ripped off and bottlefed.

eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. what about mass starvation?
of infants? no one is talking about the fact that infants are, en masse, rejecting their mother's teat after the trauma. this could, in fact, be the one incident that leads to the downfall of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I will step up and give attention to...
...all those rejected teats, free of any charge!!! It's the least I can do as a patriot!

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swimmernsecretsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. OK. Go ahead and get it over with.
My computer's down and MIS has been called, so I've got a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darknyte7 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I love "the onion"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hell, I'm confused and afraid too about her chest bump (sarcasm)
and I wish she would have kept it where it belonged that day. Don't tell me about wardrobe malfunctions. Brain malfunction and bad taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. I still haven't seen her "dirty bumps"
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 01:15 PM by Pirate looks at 50
My TV blacked out for a couple of seconds there.

On edit, I wonder if this year we will get to see Paul MacCartneys fifth Beatle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. the pictures are too much!!!
I love the giant breast coming out of the sky amd the one with a breast surrounded by cries of "NO!!!"
all hail the Onion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Look at the pictures!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. ROFL!
Only the Onion could put it into perspective. Did anyone send a copy to the AFA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarlett1 Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Budweiser has an ad that they won't show at Super Bowl
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 01:56 PM by scarlett1
telling what caused the wardrobe malfunction. Apparently in Ms J's dressing room just before the half time show he used the outfit to open his beer.

They really should show it VERY FUNNY

edit - forgot to add - go to Budweiser.com to see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. check the last paragraph - it's very telling
and, oh so true.

How many other countries laughed at the big ruckus we made over Janet Jackson's boob?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThorsHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. I am traumatized (well, slight exaggeration) in a different way
Thanks to Ms. Jackson's debacle and the ensuing FCC crackdown, the Victoria's Secret show with my girl Adriana was cancelled. Thanks for nothing Janet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. For more on Teatgate 2004
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 02:01 PM by IanDB1
Helms - Teatgate 2004: The Aftermath --
Ed Helms and Stephen Colbert go tit for teat in their explosive coverage of Janet Jackson's breasts.
http://www.comedycentral.com/mp/play.jhtml?reposid=/multimedia/tds/helms/helms_8095.html

See also:
The Teat Offensive --
America has suffered an areole-born attack! Red Alert! Buy duct tape now!
http://www.comedycentral.com/mp/play.jhtml?reposid=/multimedia/tds/stewart/jon_8095.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spacemom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. I thought it was entirely appropriate
to show a breast during the half time show.

Breasts are only useful for promoting football games and selling pick up trucks.

:bounce: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
23.  99.8 percent of the complaints were email-bombs from ONE FUNDIE GROUP!


http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000731656


Activists Dominate Content Complaints
December 06, 2004
By Todd Shields

In an appearance before Congress in February, when the controversy over Janet Jackson’s Super Bowl moment was at its height, Federal Communications Commission chairman Michael Powell laid some startling statistics on U.S. senators.

The number of indecency complaints had soared dramatically to more than 240,000 in the previous year, Powell said. The figure was up from roughly 14,000 in 2002, and from fewer than 350 in each of the two previous years. There was, Powell said, “a dramatic rise in public concern and outrage about what is being broadcast into their homes.”

Through early October, 99.9 percent of indecency complaints—aside from those concerning the Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” during the Super Bowl halftime show broadcast on CBS— were brought by the PTC, according to the FCC analysis dated Oct. 1. (The agency last week estimated it had received 1,068,767 complaints about broadcast indecency so far this year; the Super Bowl broadcast accounted for over 540,000, according to commissioners’ statements.)

<snip>

The document listed tools developed by the PTC, including continual monitoring and archiving of broadcast network programs and “cutting-edge technology to make it easier for members to contact program sponsors, the FCC, or the networks directly with a simple click of the button.”

The result, the group said, was “a more than 2,400 percent increase in online activism.”

More:
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000731656

See also:

Think Again: Watching the Directives

The Unhappy Legacy of Michael Powell

by Eric Alterman with Paul McLeary
January 27, 2005

When Michael Powell was appointed to head the FCC in 2001, he vowed to do away with a bevy of regulations, everything from the restrictions placed on the size of media companies to those governing wholesale phone rates. He also said that he wanted to peel back the far-reaching indecency rules that had long ruled television and radio broadcasts. Like many Bush appointees, however, his track record was at odds with his stated intentions, giving rise to a schizophrenic system of management that vacillated between the repressive and the permissive, the only constant being the temporary demands of whoever appears to be calling the shots in the Republican Party and its concentric circles of political contributors.
<snip>
But an enterprising reporter for Mediaweek noted that according to the FCC's own records, 99.8 percent of the complaints in 2003 were filed by a single right-wing pressure group, the Parents Television Council (PTC), a conservative activist group founded by L. Brent Bozell III, who also serves as president of the far-right Media Research Center. Despite its tiny numbers and ideological extremism, Powell's willingness to play patsy for the PTC has significantly reduced the degree of free expression enjoyed on America's airwaves and exercised an enormous influence on what Americans are permitted to see and hear. This past Veterans Day, for instance, a group of ABC stations refused to air "Saving Private Ryan" for fear of inspiring such complaints; this despite the fact that the film had been shown – unedited – in 2001 and 2002. (What did they air instead? "Return," I kid you not, "to Mayberry.")
<snip>
For these reasons, among many others, Powell will be remembered, if at all, as a plaything for his party's far right. Hours after announcing his resignation last Friday, FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein told radio talk show host Ed Schultz that Powell's chairmanship of the commission represented the "broadest, most destructive rollback" of media ownership limits ever, terming these decisions to be a "disaster." Progressive media concentration scholar Robert W. McChesney added that Powell's "tenure was marked by some of the lowest moments in the history of the FCC... Powell's record has been one of avoiding the public he was meant to serve. He had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the few public hearings he attended, yet he made countless appearances before industry groups and trade associations."

Now that Powell is about to step down, one would hope that some of his big media friendly policies and ad hoc fining procedures would follow him out the door. But that won't happen without the same kind of public outcry that shut down the new merger rules. Republicans on the FCC remain committed to a relaxation of consolidation rules and the PTC is committed to its jihad against free expression. Whether they ultimately succeed will be up to the rest of us.
Eric Alterman is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and the author of six books, including the just-published When Presidents Lie: A History of Official Deception and Its Consequences. Paul McLeary is a New York writer.

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=307452


http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=307452
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. That is a good sign actually
It shows that not nearly as many people took this seriously as we originally thought.
This group is probably a few fundies, or even more likely, one guy sending out mass e-mails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. I can see your dirty pillows...
Everyone will...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. They're called Breasts, Mama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC