datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:49 AM
Original message |
|
the word "behoove."
why is that?
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Does it really behoove you to post that? |
achtung_circus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
|
girth, lots of Anglo Saxon derivations.
|
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
3. It's a perfectly valid word. |
|
But it DOES sound a bit pretentious. :-)
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
i'd be just one more dilletante.
|
thom1102
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. not so much pretentious, as condecending... |
|
IMHO. When someone tells you that "it behooves you," it sounds like they are better than you because they know what is best. That to me sounds like morally superior repug, rather than an enlightened dem.
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. that's a double edged sword though |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 12:57 PM by datasuspect
if someone feels inferior because someone else uses bigger words or better language, does that reflect more on the giver of the perceived condescension or the receiver thereof?
|
thom1102
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. I think that both factor into the equation... |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 12:58 PM by thom1102
Often, people who come across as condescending don't mean to or even realize that they are. Their social interaction model is just different from the person they are interacting with. By the same token, people who percieve someone as being condescending are often projecting their own insecurities onto behavior that they don't completely comprehend.
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
crispini
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
that's, like, an absolutely faboo word that nobody ever uses anymore. Shame.
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
"namely"
i use it, but not here . . .
howsabout "to wit"
|
crispini
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
why don't you post a nice 'victorian' thread and we can all use our favorite old words and show off our mad language skillz? :7
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. i tried doing a proposalspeak thread |
|
cf. "coalition building"
but no one bit.
your idea sounds intriguing.
what about faux-academic writing?
i love nonsense
|
Bok_Tukalo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Some words just sound (for lack of a better word) silly in text |
Aristus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Or the word "demesne". |
Misunderestimator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It would behoove us all to start using it more. |
qnr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Oh, you just shush now. n/t |
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
13. People bristle when they hear it. |
|
I prefer "you'd be well advised to..."
The one I really, really despise (unless it's said by an old lady) because it's the most pretentious affectation anybody under 70 years old can use: Shan't.
Argh.
Redstone
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. one of my favorites is "disabuse" |
|
you'd be surprised how many times you have to disabuse someone on the correct use of that word.
|
khashka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I shan't say it doesn't behoove you to broach this topic |
|
but it is uncouth. I find myself bewildered that a person of your ilk would say such a thing.
You are a blackguard of the first water, my friend.
Khash.
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
your approach is redolent of the most infamous of highwaymen.
i am appalled that you seek to disabuse me without solicitation.
nonetheless, i imperil myself by lashing invective upon you, kindred spirit, so in that regard, i remain,
your humble and obedient servant,
Joe
|
khashka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
thou strumpety hedgepig!
Would that I could disabuse you of your felonious word use! But I fear you are lacking in even the most common and basest of sensibilities.
The thought of bandying words (nay, even swords!) with you leaves me with a world weariness that my constitution can not uphold.
So I must sign myself, Your most devoted and loving ward,
Khash.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
21. It behooveth us not to use such words, for verily I say unto you, |
|
whosoever shall use such verbiage shall be cast into outer darkness, where he may forever weep and gnash his teeth, pausing to cry aloud, "Ye varlets!"
|
brainshrub
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Words that Liberals rarely use, but cons use all the time: |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 01:00 PM by brainshrub
Shall.
to wit.
Behoove.
Retarded.
Shan't.
viz a vie.
###
Just a few that I've noticed.
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 01:00 PM by datasuspect
i don't ever really deal with conservatives, so i wouldn't know.
i guess that makes about 95% of the UK freepers (except for retarded, that is pretty much universally used).
on edit, i suppose most academics are freepers too on the basis of your analysis . . .
|
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
25. No kidding? They really say "shan't?" |
|
Might as well wear a big sign that says "Pretentious asshole, right here."
Redstone
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Bees don't have hooves, they have teeny tiny little feet. |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-12-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
27. i had it in a post this morning, i believe |
|
or last nite. funny you should ask. but, i spelled with one "o" so my bad
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message |