Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

i NEVER see this on DU:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:49 AM
Original message
i NEVER see this on DU:
the word "behoove."

why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does it really behoove you to post that?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Forsooth,
girth, lots of Anglo Saxon derivations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a perfectly valid word.
But it DOES sound a bit pretentious. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. without pretension
i'd be just one more dilletante.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thom1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. not so much pretentious, as condecending...
IMHO. When someone tells you that "it behooves you," it sounds like they are better than you because they know what is best. That to me sounds like morally superior repug, rather than an enlightened dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. that's a double edged sword though
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 12:57 PM by datasuspect
if someone feels inferior because someone else uses bigger words or better language, does that reflect more on the giver of the perceived condescension or the receiver thereof?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thom1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I think that both factor into the equation...
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 12:58 PM by thom1102
Often, people who come across as condescending don't mean to or even realize that they are. Their social interaction model is just different from the person they are interacting with. By the same token, people who percieve someone as being condescending are often projecting their own insecurities onto behavior that they don't completely comprehend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. behavior . . .
or even words.

oy vey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Or the word "viz"
that's, like, an absolutely faboo word that nobody ever uses anymore. Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. videlicet?
"namely"

i use it, but not here . . .

howsabout "to wit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. that's a good one
why don't you post a nice 'victorian' thread and we can all use our favorite old words and show off our mad language skillz? :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. i tried doing a proposalspeak thread
cf. "coalition building"

but no one bit.

your idea sounds intriguing.

what about faux-academic writing?

i love nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Some words just sound (for lack of a better word) silly in text
Sort of like "rue"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Or the word "demesne".
Why not? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. It would behoove us all to start using it more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, you just shush now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. People bristle when they hear it.
I prefer "you'd be well advised to..."

The one I really, really despise (unless it's said by an old lady) because it's the most pretentious affectation anybody under 70 years old can use: Shan't.

Argh.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. one of my favorites is "disabuse"
you'd be surprised how many times you have to disabuse someone on the correct use of that word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. I shan't say it doesn't behoove you to broach this topic
but it is uncouth. I find myself bewildered that a person of your ilk would say such a thing.

You are a blackguard of the first water, my friend.

Khash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Brigand!
your approach is redolent of the most infamous of highwaymen.

i am appalled that you seek to disabuse me without solicitation.

nonetheless, i imperil myself by lashing invective upon you, kindred spirit, so in that regard, i remain,

your humble and obedient servant,


Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khashka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Stand and deliver
thou strumpety hedgepig!

Would that I could disabuse you of your felonious word use! But I fear you are lacking in even the most common and basest of sensibilities.

The thought of bandying words (nay, even swords!) with you leaves me with a world weariness that my constitution can not uphold.

So I must sign myself,
Your most devoted and loving ward,

Khash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. It behooveth us not to use such words, for verily I say unto you,
whosoever shall use such verbiage shall be cast into outer darkness, where he may forever weep and gnash his teeth, pausing to cry aloud, "Ye varlets!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Words that Liberals rarely use, but cons use all the time:
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 01:00 PM by brainshrub
Shall.

to wit.

Behoove.

Retarded.

Shan't.

viz a vie.

###

Just a few that I've noticed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. hmmm . . .
Edited on Sat Mar-12-05 01:00 PM by datasuspect
i don't ever really deal with conservatives, so i wouldn't know.

i guess that makes about 95% of the UK freepers (except for retarded, that is pretty much universally used).

on edit, i suppose most academics are freepers too on the basis of your analysis . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. No kidding? They really say "shan't?"
Might as well wear a big sign that says "Pretentious asshole, right here."

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bees don't have hooves, they have teeny tiny little feet.
see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. i had it in a post this morning, i believe
or last nite. funny you should ask. but, i spelled with one "o" so my bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC