|
year's Xindi arc. I thought the whole thought, in the light of TOS's backstory, was horrendous and repulsive. Yeah, I knew they had to create some exciting stories, but they could still have worked with some of the backstory of TOS and the spin-offs by concentrating on "first contact" stories, and on known races in the known series.
I too hated Voyager. And, like you, I place Enterprise second worst. But the potential could have been there. I agree with someone else's comments a short while ago on whether Scott Bakula should have played Archer, because he's so well known in his own right that it detracted from the "unknown" quality of the Enterprise's history. If they had given the role to one of the show's other leads--Keating or Trinneer, for example (I think Trinneer would have been perfect), it would have had a different presence.
I'll tape tonight's 2 hour finale for historic purposes, but I don't have any feelings about it being the last episode of a Trek franchise for awhile. It hasn't been on my calendar for quite a while as it is.
On the other hand, I must admit to being an addict to Stargate. Perhaps it's the premise, with unending possibilities, with so many different ideas in one, but the show is priceless. And to make it even better, they've dealt with actors gone missing, and actors leaving and getting killed off, and it still holds up. For that alone, entering its 9th season, that is spectacular. I even like Atlantis, the spin-off. Sometimes it's more light, which means the actors don't take themselves as seriously, and that's perfect. The two male leads (Flanigan and Hewlett) play off each other so well that the buddy chemistry is superb. And Torri Higginson is a thousand times better a female authority figure than Kate Mulgrew as the Captain could ever be.
As for B5, I enjoyed it for awhile. Being in Hollywood for its run, and working with the studios, I knew stories that could curl your toes, and as a result, I wasn't as impressed as some people were. That's what happens when you have a megalomaniac as a creator. His creation was intriguing, but the archtypes and mythos were so cliched that it was pedantic at best. What is intriguing is that DS9 and B5 were created around a similar idea, and while some people think DS9 was inferior to B5, I think DS9 withstands the test of time far better, because it ended up concentrating on the character driven plots, and that made it more humane in the end. Let's face it: people will remember Quark and Odo twenty years from now, not Garibaldi, Jeffrey Sinclair, Delenn or John Sheridan (even though I named two of my cats after Delenn and Garibaldi!).
|