Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is only one live-action series worth shooting as a feature film...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:08 PM
Original message
There is only one live-action series worth shooting as a feature film...
"The Prisoner".

That movie would kick ass. Particularly if it was based on the DC comic "The Prisoner: Shattered Visage".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. But who plays John Drake?
To me it's like Carl Kolchak; I can't imagine anyone being Kolchak other than Darrin McGavin, just like I can't imagine anyone other than Patrick McGoohan as Drake..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's not Drake.
McGoohan says the Prisoner is not Drake's character.

As for who would play him... I think it sould be a Brit. I also think someone like Edward Norton could pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know
But I always saw him as Drake; can't get around it...

Norton would be a good choice; maybe Jeremy Northam, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanuckAmok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Who was that fellow from "The English Patient"... he might be good.
He's a little too "pretty" though. Number Six should be a little haggered looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly
Ralph Finnes, but he's too pretty. He should be a handsome guy, but one w/ a few miles on him, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He should also be about one second away from facial
transmission of acute paramoia and anger...Patrick McGoohan's character was pretty tightly-wound underneath that supremely cool facade. I can't think of anyone, offhand, who'd fit the bill. How about Hugh Jackman, if you scuffed him up and aged him a bit? Sam Neill? Harrison Ford? Sean Bean?

Oooohhh...Christopher Walken. :-)

Actually, that'd be interesting. The more I think about it, though, the more Sean Bean sounds good. If Hollywood's in typical form, though, it'd be Ben Affleck in the title role. Either that or they'd get their British Beans mixed up:



Maybe Dolly Parton could play Rover.

The Prisoner is still one of the best things ever made for television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sam Neill!!!
Oh, that's a great idea; I could see him doing it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. What about Hugh Laurie from "House?"
He's actually English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. That's not a bad choice, too
I know him from House; what else has he done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The only other thing I know is "Black Adder."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I think Laurie would be terrific. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I agree.
I can't think of anyone better, frankly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. You'll probably get your wish, the way things are nowadays
But chances are the movie will suck, as opposed to kicking, ass.

I'm actually "waiting" for the following feature treatments:

Sanford & Son (most likely Cedric the Entertainer and/or Chris Rock)
The Six Million Dollar Man (most likely Will Smith)
The Bionic Woman (most likely Cameron Diaz or Jada Pinkett Smith)
Nanny & The Professor (most likely Emily Watson & Luke Wilson)
Get Smart (most likely Adam Sandler or Ben Stiller)
M*A*S*H
Rhoda
The Simpsons (most likely with Vince Vaughn)
Roots (directed by maybe John Singleton or, I dunno, Betty Thomas)
The Rifleman
HR Puffenstuf
The Kids from CAPER
Petticoat Junction
CPO Sharkey

I promise you this is not a fun list, it's a heavy-sigh list based on what Hollywood continues to shovel out.

And does anyone seriously go to these remake/rehashes anymore expecting a great movie??? I was reading Terry Lawson of the Detroit Free Press panning "The Dukes of Hazzard," which apparently is a critical dud, though it is OF COURSE tops at this weekend's box office (the other Hollywood obsession which is killing creativity, IMHO).

I heard an interesting theory that, if true, completely clarifies what's going on here. What do you think?

Big screen treatment of old TV show=Hollywood marketing ploy to generate pre-buzz for the eventual DVD release of said TV show. Ergo, quality is well besides the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC