LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 03:57 PM
Original message |
| This dude called National Geographic the poor man's Playboy. |
| Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4_Legs_Good
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It probably actually costs more than Playboy!
:)
Actually I guess they both have the same amount of ads.
david
|
| LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. I think the implication might be... |
|
...you go to the library to read it, or read your parents'.
|
| One_Life_To_Give
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. But Ma never complained about reading Nat. Geographic. |
|
However reading the other would have earned my a swat up side the head.
|
| sui generis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. gollee - that joke is about 50 years old |
|
time for some new material whaddya think? :shrug:
|
| LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
It was like 1988 when this dude said it too.
|
| pnorman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-10-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. TITTY is the operative word here. |
|
Way back before Playboy, that was the only "legit" mag where a young lad could feast his eyes on bare bosoms. Of course, they were all suitably dark-skinned native lasses, to keep within the bounds of propriety.
pnorman
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
