Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$4.69 for a Big Mac extra value meal? WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:08 PM
Original message
$4.69 for a Big Mac extra value meal? WTF?
Last time I went to McD's (about two years ago) I payed $2.99 for the same food. Some of their other meals were almost $6.00! Where do they get off pricing their food in line with non-fast food restaurants? Are people actually buying their crap food for that price? I ended up getting three items on the dollar menu instead. I can still get a full meal (with actual nutritional value) at Sonic for $4.00.. I will never go back to McD's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's an even bigger ripoff than that...
that's not even food. About as nutritious as cardboard, except with more fat and cholesterol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It still tastes good though
Extra value meals are now neither extra, nor a value, nor a meal.. Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. try not eating fast food for 3 months...THEN try mcdonalds...
i guarantee you, you will ever say "it still tastes good" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. We buy frozen turkey burgers when they are on sale
We get 12 patties for $4 and trust me when I say that they are much better than that junk at McDonalds. In about the time it would take to wait in line at a fast food joint, I have lunch made for four and at a fraction of the price. Sometimes I love being poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malmapus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Same here, I buy the bulk frozen patties from Costco
I forget the price, like $12 for 60 or something insane like that. But yeah I'm good for a while :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. have a great visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ??? Don't hold your breath.
I won't go to McDonalds again.

Or are you implying that making fun of people who sue for obesity is somehow taboo here? I'm not sure I understood your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kick-ass-bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. .
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Oooo!
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That multi-$billion ad campaign is pretty persuasive.
They have psychologists on the payroll to figure out the best ways for advertisers to get into people's heads. McD's is in no position to complain when people suffer health problems as a result of doing exactly what McD's wants them to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's a legal product.
Is it Budweiser's fault if I become an alcoholic drinking their beer? Their ads are pretty persuasive, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Irrelevent
The product does what it does regardless of it's legal status.

I don't see anything wrong with having companies pay for the foreseeable social costs of their very profitable products. It has nothing to do with negligence or wrong doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. So anything that
I abuse, I can stick the company with the costs by claiming that their advertising is effective and their products are profitable? Is there no requirement for willpower, responsibility and common sense? You'd have to be an absolute idiot not to know that eating three squares a day at McD's is a bad idea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. And what personal responsibility does the company have?
Yeah, people ought to know better. Those running McD's DO know better. All I am saying is that as a general proposition, those who make profits ought to bear the real cost of doing business and not fob off onto the public costs that are not obvious, like inventory or labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. To follow the law and whatever
oversight / regulations they're subject to. If they sell a legal product and people abuse it, I'm not going to blame the corporation.

I've got plenty of problems with corporate greed, but the stupidity of some of their customers is not one of those problems. Maybe I'm lacking in compassion, but I don't have an ounce of sympathy for people who eat junk constantly and then whine about being out of shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Hilarious.
Spoken like someone who hasn't a clue how advertising really works. But the "psychologists on the payroll" bit is easy to swallow, despite being fake. It's like a McNugget. You made a McStatement. Or would that be a McArgument?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I don't need to work on Madison Avenue to know that
eating junk food constantly is a bad idea. Is there no call for personal responsibility and good judgement these days? Am I really to believe that "Your Honor, I became a fat pig because I couldn't resist the call of "da-da-da-da-da, I'm lovin' it" is a worthwhile argument?

Why not enlighten me if you think I'm really missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Wasn't talkin' to you.
I actually agree with you to a point--people need to take some personal responsibility.

So...um...yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Sorry.
I'm getting hit pretty hard by some others for pushing the idea of personal responsibility, so it was a reflex response. Mea culpa. Glad to see at least someone agrees with me to some degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. What you are missing is how ...
... thoroughly corporate advertisers control our culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. So why are they not able to
make me buy products I hate? If they were so effective, I'd be buying Doritos, Pepsi, Coke, Oreos, a lot of that Chef Boyardee crap, etc. For that matter, I'd be eating at McDonalds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Why do you say it is false?
If you are running a multi-billion dollar global marketing campaign, don't you think you would check with those who know how the mind works to see if the ads will work? If so, you not go one step further and let them design the ads. You seem very niave about how corporate branding and the cultivation of loyalty works. Why do you think their mascot is a clown? Why do you think they invented happy meals? They want to imprint brand loyalty on children so they will grow up with a warm and fuzzy image of McD's. Based on the responses I am reading, it has worked.

By the way, McD's is the most litigious company on earth. They will sue anyone with a clown or a Mc in it's name no matter how long that little company has been in business. So don't give me any crap about the cost of litigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Even funnier.
You seem very niave about how corporate branding and the cultivation of loyalty works.

It's what I do for a living. And you seem to have the same naive everything-I-know-about-advertising-I-learned-from-watching-Bewitched-and-Bosom-Buddies knowledge that perpetuates nekkid-lady-in-the-icecube silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Hogwash...
A million or two in legal fees is NOTHING to a corp like McD's, and would only represent the smallest fraction of a penny of the cost of their "food."

Probably has more to do with declining sales, higher advertising costs, and increased greed on the part of the management/shareholders. Probably other factors, too... for instance, I bet people who DO eat at McD's regularly are NOT particularly price sensitive when compared to the perceived benefits of convenience, placating the kids, lack of other options, etc.

Plus, they are trying to offer some higher quality items to lure adults back for lunch and dinner, and they charge a pretty high premium for those items.

So, Ron, do you also believe that US medical costs are so high because of malpractice settlements? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Do you deny
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 04:26 PM by Ron Mexico
that it has something to do with it? I know doctors who quit because malpractice insurance was too high for them.

For that matter, where do you get a figure like "a million or two?" How many times do they have to shell out a million or two per year?

Whatever part litigation plays in the price increase, you can bet that the cost of litigation has been completely passed on to consumers. Maybe it isn't as high as I think it is, but I seriously doubt it's as low as you think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmoney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. But the insurance rates are not high because of settlements...
...it's because the insurance companies are criminals, essentially, jacking the prices on insurance that people MUST have in order to do their jobs, drive a car, stay healthy.

Notice how term life insurance is CHEAPER than it's ever been? Partly due to competition, but also because few people are REQUIRED to have term life insurance.

In states where settlements were capped, the malpractice insurance rates were NO LOWER than in other states where settlements were not capped. Also, doctors who have been sued for malpractice tend to be bad doctors who have been sued MULTIPLE times. Of course, these bad apples are used as a justification to raise EVERYONE'S rates.

The insurance companies got creamed when the stock market tanked last time, so they're making it up on the backs of policy holders. Insurance companies have a license to steal and are among the worst, most predatory types of businesses in the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. To be perfectly straightforward,
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 04:49 PM by Ron Mexico
I haven't noticed a decrease in the price life insurance. I'm not denying that there is one.

You may be right in terms of malpractice and its effect on the cost of health care; I confess up front that I am woefully uninformed on this issue. However, there's no doubt in my mind that whatever additional cost malpractice adds, it's pssed on to us.

Oh, and for the record, I am NOT for capping settlements. I am for a screening process that will filter out truly frivolous suits. No matter what anyone says to me, if you (not you personally) eat three Big Mac meals per day over the course of a year, you've got nobody but yourself to blame. At the same time, the Repugs' idea of $250,000 for the medical suits is absolutely fucking ridiculous. Even my dittohead father laughed at it.

When I first moved to Arlington, the nearest McDonalds had Big Mac meals for $2.79. Over the next 8-10 months I saw it go up to $4.49, and this is when lawsuit after lawsuit was in the paper.

I will never vote for capping settlements when settlements are warranted. But fat fucks who use McDonalds to follow the food pyramid will never get my sympathy, no matter if their suits added 80% or 8% to the price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. You're paying for the ad budget
Watch cartoons for a whild and you'll see where your money got spent. McDonalds has ads on just about every kids show including the ones on PBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. McDonalds? Blech, I'd rather lick the food off the floor.
Probably has more nutritional value, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miss_kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. gas prices. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Gas prices, marketing costs, and the fact that less people go there
All contribute to this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. Less demand should = lower prices
I don't think that's it.. But you're probably right about the gas prices and marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. In NYC, it's at least $1 more than that, even
closer to $6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC