Reposted for my Lounge-mates: The one sentence reply to the RW red herring

[Richardo]

"Isn't the world better off without Saddam Hussein?"

Answer: "The costs outweigh the benefits."
.
.
.
.
.

Implied in the answer:

Coalition dead, wounded.
Iraqi dead, wounded.
$300 billion cost.
Increased terror attacks.
OBL still free.
Afghanistan unfinished.
$3/gallon gas.
Etc
Etc

[WoodrowFan]

1. sums it up nicely (NT)

[Hugin]

2. My reply...

"The effects of Saddam Hussein are still a part of the world."

For the dumber among us...

"What are you talking about... Saddam Hussein isn't gone."

[BOSSHOG]

3. No its not

The world is not better off without Saddamm Hussein. Only blind fucking religiously insane lemmings who see only good in a bastard like george bush would believe such a foolish fucking notion. Are you one of those ignorant fucksticks who think you are a conservative?

I like that reply too.

[Richardo]

4. Why do you hate America, BOSSHOG?

THat's one of my answers too, but I can never get past the second 'fucking' without the other person starting to crosstalk me.

:hi:

[lpbk2713]

5. Our country is now divided more than it ever has been ..... n/t

[Richardo]

6. Well, except for 1860-1865.

:)

[lpbk2713]

7. Touché

I stand corrected.

[Mojambo]

12. 1799 was pretty rocky as well

Hell, they passed laws to imprison people who dissented against the administration.

[Rabrrrrrr]

8. That requires that the asshole have an understanding of economics

[Richardo]

10. You can hear the mental gears grinding to a rusty halt....

Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee <jam>.

[elperromagico]

11. You can simplify economics by asking them how they like the gas prices.

Even RWers buy gas.

[AnarchoFreeThinker]

9. My reply: Is the world better off without 1800 US troops?

[meow2u3]

13. My reply: The world would be even better off without Bush!

eom