HawkerHurricane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 02:24 PM
Original message |
Poll question: HawkerHurricane's NFL power ratings! |
|
Welcome once more to HawkerHurricane’s NFL power rating. However, I have a new system I am experimenting with in a effort to solve problems. So, first the old system: one point per win plus one point per win your opponents had…
Rank Team points record
32 Raiders 8 2-7
31 Bears 10 3-6
30 Jaguars 11 2-7
29 Chargers 11 2-7
28 Lions 11 3-6
27 Browns 12 3-6
26 Jets 12 3-6
25 Falcons 13 2-7
24 Steelers 15 3-6
23 Cardinals 15 3-6
22 Saints 16 4-5
21 Texans 17 3-6
20 Broncos 19 5-4
19 49rs 20 4-5
18 Ravens 20 5-4
17 Dolphins 20 5-4
16 Bills 21 4-5
15 Bengals 21 4-5
14 Redskins 22 4-5
13 Packers 22 4-5
12 Buccaneers 23 4-5
11 Giants 23 4-5
10 Eagles 27 6-3
9 Vikings 27 6-3
8 Rams 27 6-3
7 Colts 28 7-2
6 Seahawks 33 6-3
5 Panthers 33 7-2
4 Titans 33 7-2
3 Cowboys 34 7-2
2 Patriots 40 7-2
1 Chiefs 40 9-0
Now, the new system gives TWO points for every win...
Rank Team points record
32 Raiders 10 2-7
31 Jaguars 13 2-7
30 Chargers 13 2-7
29 Bears 13 3-6
28 Lions 14 3-6
27 Falcons 15 2-7
26 Browns 15 3-6
25 Jets 15 3-6
24 Steelers 18 3-6
23 Cardinals 18 3-6
22 Texans 20 3-6
21 Saints 20 4-5
20 49rs 24 4-5
19 Broncos 24 5-4
18 Bills 25 4-5
17 Bengals 25 4-5
16 Ravens 25 5-4
15 Dolphins 25 5-4
14 Redskins 26 4-5
13 Packers 26 4-5
12 Buccaneers 27 4-5
11 Giants 27 4-5
10 Eagles 33 6-3
9 Vikings 33 6-3
8 Rams 33 6-3
7 Colts 35 7-2
6 Seahawks 39 6-3
5 Panthers 40 7-2
4 Titans 40 7-2
3 Cowboys 41 7-2
2 Patriots 47 7-2
1 Chiefs 49 9-0
Well, what do you think:
|
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If you had problems needing solutions |
|
then empirical method says you must try something new. Either way I like the Patriots' high ranking. :)
|
VermontDem2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It was the best way to determine who was the best team in the league because it also looked at the quality opponents they beat.
|
Faygo Kid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
3. We're 28th! We're 28th! |
|
Either way, the Lions suck. But, we are used to it. A Super Bowl in my lifetime? No. My daughter's? No. Before the end of this Millenium? Go Lions!
|
VermontDem2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
The Lions are a very young team and they are building the foundation of their team, they have young recievers and a young QB who could be great in the future, they will possibly get a high draft pick and some real good running backs will be in the draft next year. They also have a young defense as well, the Lions are in good position to be great in 3 or 4 years.
|
Faygo Kid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I remember that claim from 1970 |
|
After 47 years with one playoff win, you get kinda jaded, to say the least. They are the Lions: Will they kill Mariucci's coaching career, as they have done to all their other head coaches (Forzano, Hudspeth, Clark, Fontes, Morningweg, et. al.). I say yes. They ARE the Lions!
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-03 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Which is why KC didn't trade Okoye to Detroit |
|
They didn't want to be accused of throwing Christian to the Lions!
Bwahahahaha!!!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |