Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's a sexy, juicy tidbit about the new film "A History of Violence" --

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:37 PM
Original message
Here's a sexy, juicy tidbit about the new film "A History of Violence" --
While I just love Viggo Mortensen, I found the film a little bit wanting in the exposition about the lead character he played, Tom Stall.

So far, this movie has been a big hit with both the audience and the critics. There are two extraordinary love scenes with Tom (Viggo) and his screen wife, played by Maria Bello. One is tender beyond belief, the other extraordinarily violent. As an added attraction, you do get to see Viggo's rear anatomy, to say it nicely.

But the biggest surprise of all tonight is how the director David Cronenberg allegedly prepared his actors for these scenes. Maybe you can put it in the category of "walking the walk and talking the talk!"

Read about it here:

http://contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/cronenbergs%20public%20sex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mwdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeeeeshh!
that would be a tad uncomfortable. What was that Monty Python sketch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Viggo was on with Jon Stewart a couple of nights ago and didn't
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 08:55 PM by Radio_Lady
mention the "instructional" he and Maria Bello were apparently obliged to watch. I wish this new film held together better than I think it does, but clearly, I am in the minority. This movie is getting a very high rating this early in the game.

David Cronenberg must be an exhibitionist, don't you think? Who else would do this? Me, I can't even pee with my husband watching. It's a woman thing. I did some crazy things in my life in performing, but this takes the cake!

William Hurt is terrific as a Chicago hoodlum. Maybe even a little buzz about the possibility of a supporting Oscar nomination, although the length of his scene is a little slim.

"A History of Violence" officially opens tomorrow, (Friday, September 30th). I must advise you that all the scenes which appear to be shot in Illinois and Indiana -- are really Canada. So what else is new?

In peace,

Radio Lady (and D/B/A the Movie Lady every Friday!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'll see it..
Anything with Viggo in it interests me, & it does sound interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good. Let me know what you think. I enjoy Viggo very much --
I can't think of him in sexual terms, because he was born in 1958, which makes him my stepson's age. I was born in 1939. I could have at least babysat for him. In another culture, with early maturation and marriage, he might have been my son.

But in this life or another life, what the hell? I can (wet) dream, can't I?

I think he's adorable and he turns me on. I didn't see "The Lord of the Rings" but did like him in "Hidalgo" although the story sucked...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The only reason I watched "Lord of the Rings"
was to watch him. The story is great, but he made a perfect king. I loved him in "A Walk on the Moon", also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Viggo has such a sweet look, and that chin dimple!
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 09:43 PM by Radio_Lady
I remember seeing him in the first episode of "The Lord of the Rings" but he was so heavily made up that I didn't really NOTICE him.

Recently, I saw the 1985 movie "Witness" which must have been one of his first appearances. He was adorable as an Amish guy!

I remember seeing "A Walk on the Moon" with my husband -- Viggo plays the blouse salesman, right?

Here's a link to the rest of Viggo's work:

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001557/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Cool!
I have to check these out. He's actually been around longer than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Original story picked up by UK media a few days ago.
http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/entertainment/95762004.htm

David Cronenberg's On Set Public Sex Scenes
September 27, 2005, 7:24:15

CRONENBERG'S PUBLIC SEX

Eccentric film-maker DAVID CRONENBERG shocked his cast and crew on the set of new movie A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE, by publicly performing sex scenes with his wife.

The director hoped his explicit displays of affection with his wife would help stars VIGGO MORTENSEN and MARIA BELLO, who play man and wife in the film, feel more comfortable during their sex scenes together.

But, instead, the Cronenbergs just left everyone on the set stunned.

(Link has the rest of the story...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. It was weird seeing William Hurt in that kind of role!
You usually see William Hurt playing these dour, buttoned up, uptight types. Alot of the roles were pretty much the same on after the other. I will give him a thumbs up for the movie "Altered States", that's an old one. But to see him play some ruthless mobster was really a stretch. He probably loved it, something different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. The "buzz" is that he might get a "supporting actor" nomination
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 08:10 PM by Radio_Lady
for an "Oscar" -- we'll see! I thought he was terrific -- and Ed Harris was also pretty menacing and WAY overdue for an "Oscar." See the list for yourself:

http://www.us.imdb.com/name/nm0000438/awards

Awards for Ed Harris (I)

Academy Awards, USA
Year Result Award Category/Recipient(s)
2003 NOMINATED Oscar Best Actor in a Supporting Role
for: The Hours (2002)

2001 NOMINATED Oscar Best Actor in a Leading Role
for: Pollock (2000)

1999 NOMINATED Oscar Best Actor in a Supporting Role
for: The Truman Show (1998)

1996 NOMINATED Oscar Best Actor in a Supporting Role
for: Apollo 13 (1995)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. William Hurt did win an Oscar in 1986, but Harris never has won.
Awards for
William Hurt (I)

Academy Awards, USA
Year Result Award Category/Recipient(s)
1988 NOMINATED Oscar Best Actor in a Leading Role
for: Broadcast News (1987)

1987 NOMINATED Oscar Best Actor in a Leading Role
for: Children of a Lesser God (1986)

1986 WON Oscar Best Actor in a Leading Role
for: Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Liked the movie but it didn't live up to my super high expectations.
Basically I'll summarize my problem with it by saying that to me, it's a film that's much more interesting when it's building up to something, to revelations about someone's past. Once the revelations are made I think it's a lot less interesting and good.

For me, "The Fly" and "Dead Ringers" are still Cronenberg's best.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Mine, either.
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 10:11 PM by Radio_Lady
I didn't see "Dead Ringers" but had large expectations because of Internet buzz and just hopin' that Viggo got a good part this time.
"Hidalgo" didn't make it; maybe this will.

PS. Don't miss the link in my initial post. It's a classic! It came from our top reviewer at the Portland Oregonian, Shawn Levy. He's blogging now! It's a new age!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. UPDATE: Has anyone see this picture this weekend?
I'd be interested in your reactions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cronenberg is an odd cat...
Doesn't surprise me at all, haha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I guess that's one way to put it.... to say the least, it's odd behavior!
But I can't imagine other directors actually performing sex acts with their wives in front of actors... in order to get them to understand how to do these scenes. This takes "method acting" to an extreme!

I think it would be pretty embarassing to most people, don't you think? What about the wife? Who is she? What's her excuse?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Cronenberg is most definitely not other directors, haha
I'm not saying one way or another if it was the best way to direct the scene. I don't know. It's probably not how I would have directed it. But why does his wife need to have an "excuse"? I'm sure she didn't mind, otherwise she probably woulnd't have done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Here's an interesting link about Cronenberg from Indiana --
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 08:19 PM by Radio_Lady
where "A History of Violence" was supposed to happen (but didn't).

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051002/ENTERTAINMENT03/510020350/1080

With "A History of Violence" -- his latest film, which is set in Indiana -- the Canadian director breaks out of his world of plants that strangle people ("From the Drain"), flesh-eating parasites ("Shivers"), exploding heads ("Scanners"), a man-into-bug metamorphosis ("The Fly"), and nightmarish, sexually suggestive fantasy creatures ("Naked Lunch").

In "A History of Violence," Viggo Mortensen plays a small-town diner operator who is accused of being a New Jersey mobster after he kills two men who try to rob his business.

A Toronto native born in 1943, Cronenberg had an early interest in writing and science. One of his most mainstream films, "The Dead Zone," teamed him with a soul mate, horror writer Stephen King.

The soft-spoken Cronenberg, who is married with three children and a grandchild, and who says he rides a bike and takes out the trash, spoke with reporter Bonnie Britton last week about "A History of Violence," set in fictional Millbrook, Ind., but shot in Canada.
(Link to the rest of the article.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. I saw the movie last night
I love Viggo--he is so hot. :) The movie was not so hot. They could have developed his character more, showing the dichotomy between his new life and old. The son's character left me confused a bit--that story line needed more. Too many broken noses and blood-spattered shirts. And the end was...predictable and left me wanting more.

I did like seeing Viggo's a**, however and that made it worth the $8.75!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Viggo's beautiful bottom -- Going... going... GONE!
Sold to the lady in the front row for $8.75!!!

(I got to see it for FREE -- one of the perks of being a movie reviewer!)

Yes, the picture could have used much more characterization. However, it was taken from a "graphic novel" (read: comic book). They gave them away at the screening.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh fer the love of mike.
Why does anyone think that you need character development or plot when the point of the film is jack off material? Most of these guys have a pen in one hand and a boner in the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, it's hard to do that BEFORE they release the film to DVD or VHS...
unless you're WAY up in the balcony...

Are you talking about the director?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Writer and director.
The only thing new anymore is when they have a script doctor put some funny lines in once in awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. hahaha--"jack off material"
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 07:36 AM by Evergreen Emerald
It was touted, however as a chick-flick. Had it been touted as jack-off material, I would not have expected so much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. I just saw this movie last night with the hubby
It was pretty intense and definitely waaay violent. I'll see anything with Viggo in it, but his character wasn't my fave. William Hurt was great, although too short of a role.

Must be interesting being married to a guy like Cronenberg. Maybe the public sex thing really spices up their relationship, who knows? :shrug:

To each their own, I guess. But how awkward for the actors and the others "forced" to watch!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yep, that's how I felt, too. This sort of stuff was predominating a lot
of talk radio -- way back in the 1970s.

I'm thinking of Nena & George O'Neill's book "Open Marriage" -- but maybe this is exhibitionism more than wife (and husband) swapping. Lots of people were writing their own marriage vows, or doing unique marital contracts, etc.

Hey, I've been married three times (including to my "current" husband for 33 years) and I still don't think I've missed anything by NOT "doing it" in front of a crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yeah; NOT a good movie to inadvertantly
take your 13 y/o daughter to. Yikes.

Then again, if she's gonna see the occasional R rated sex, why shouldn't it be realistic? Just not when I'm sitting next to her, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Difficult movie choice. Especially the almost-rape scene as well as
the closeups of people who have been mangled.

Did you know what you were getting into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. What a strange movie
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 11:54 PM by fujiyama
I now know why Stewart kept saying that Cronenberg is nuts (I had never seen any of his films before) - he is! I had heard about his previous film "Crash" where people get into car accidents and then have sex...so I shouldn't have been surprised.

It wasn't a bad movie necessarily. But I think it could have been better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. fujiyama, I totally agree. It could have been better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. However, 3,009 people have rated it a 7.9 out of 10 at the movie site --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. Cronenberg is a wack job
and I mean that in a good way

I love how his films are over the line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. It can't be a big winner opening wide in 4th place with only $8 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC